Skip to content

Cost-utility Analysis Treatment of Bartholin's Abscess : Word Catheter Versus Incision-drainage.

Cost-utility Analysis Treatment of Bartholin's Abscess : Word Catheter Versus Incision-drainage.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04093310
Acronym
BARTHO-KT
Enrollment
302
Registered
2019-09-18
Start date
2020-01-17
Completion date
2024-05-31
Last updated
2023-06-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bartholin's Gland Abscess Treatment

Keywords

incision-drainage, Bartholin's abscess, Word catheter, Marsupialization, Cost-utility analysis

Brief summary

Bartholin's gland abscess is a condition requiring emergency consultation. Placement of a Word catheter, which is a minor technique used in France as a treatment of bartholin's Abscess, can be done in an emergency room without hospitalization. Actually, incision-drainage, which is the most widespread treatment in France, is performed on day surgery with or without overnight hospitalization. Our hypothesis is that the use of Word catheter compared to incision-drainage would not modify the quality of life of the patients but would allow a saving of up to 3 M€ per year in France.

Interventions

DEVICEWord Catheter

Use of the Word catheter to remove the Bartholin's abscess

PROCEDUREIncision-drainage

Incision-drainage to remove the Bartholin's abscess

Sponsors

Nantes University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Abscess of Bartholin's gland Patient able to understand the protocol Patient who signed informed consent Patient with social insurance

Exclusion criteria

Spontaneous fistulization of the abscess before surgical treatment Abscess volume under 3 ml Medical treatment which avoid incision or word catheter placement patients under guardianship Unable to complete questionnaires Patients not affiliated to social protection regimen Pregnant or post-partum women (until 4 weeks after delivery)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
cost-utility ratio, according to the societal perspective of the of the management of Bartholin's gland abscess by the Word catheter compared to the incision-drainage12 monthsThe utility will be measured by: Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALYs) as estimated from responses to the Euroqol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D 5L) health-related quality of life questionnaire. The questionnaire focuses on 5 dimensions: mobility, personal autonomy, current activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. For each of these dimensions, 5 answers are possible. The costs will be measured by the addition of the following costs: Outpatient resource consumption collected in a declarative patient questionnaire. Hospital care resources using the the database of the Medicalised Information System Program of each recruiting site

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Non inferiority evaluation of Word catheter vs. Incision drainage in terms of painat baseline and day 1Pain numeric scale from 0 to 10
Non inferiority evaluation of Word catheter versus incision-drainage in terms of recurrence rate12 monthsNumber of homolateral recurrences of Bartholin's abscess, declared by the patient
Comparison of Word catheter versus incision-drainage concerning pain12 monthsPain numeric scale from 0 to 10
Comparison of Word catheter versus incision-drainage concerning management timeDay 0 (procedure day), Day 1Date and time of patient initial management (randomization) Date and time of the beginning of the procedure date and time of the end of the procedure date and time of the hospital departure
Comparison of Word catheter versus incision-drainage in terms of complications12 monthsnumber of complications related to the procedure (healing complications, infection, lost of the Word catheter), contro-lateral Bartholin's abscess occurrence
Budget impact analysis for the health insurance point of view in case of diffusion of the Word catheter5 yearsComparison of intervention costs on the study sample and projection of these costs over 5 years, from the health insurance and hospital perspectives
Comparison of Word catheter versus incision-drainage in terms of impact on sexual activityBaseline, one month, 6 months and 12 monthsScore of the Female Sexual Function Index: self-questionnaire including 19 questions assessing different parameters of the sexual activity
Comparison of Word catheter versus incision-drainage in terms of quality of life using the SF-12-HSBaseline, one month, 6 months and 12 monthsShort-Form-12-Health-Survey questionnaire score: self-questionnaire including 12 questions measuring different aspects of quality of life
Comparison of Word catheter versus incision-drainage in terms of quality of life using the EQ-5DBaseline, one day, one month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 monthsEQ-5D 5L score (described in primary outcome)
Comparison of Word catheter versus incision-drainage in terms global patient impression and improvementOne day, one month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 monthsPatient Global Impression and Improvement (PGI-I) global index used to rate the response of a condition to a therapy (transition scale). It is a single question asking the patient to rate their global condition now, as compared with how it was prior to before beginning treatment on a scale from 1 - very much better to 7 - very much worse
Comparison of Word catheter versus incision-drainage in terms of surgical failureImmediate post-operative (D0) and one monthWord catheter: insertion failure, loss, removal decision (from the patient or the surgeon) Incision-drainage: incomplete drainage

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026