Skip to content

A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety on Moderate to Severe Dry Eye

A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of HBM9036 Ophthalmic Solution Versus Placebo in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Dry Eye

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04092907
Enrollment
100
Registered
2019-09-17
Start date
2019-03-22
Completion date
2019-07-10
Last updated
2021-08-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of HBM9036 Ophthalmic Solution versus placebo in the treatment of dry eye

Detailed description

HBM9036 is a molecularly engineered tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (TNFR1) fragment. A total of 100 subjects are expected to be randomized. Subjects will be randomized 1:1 at Visit 2 to HBM9036 Ophthalmic Solution or placebo group, bilaterally BID for eight weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint is sign changes from baseline in change from pre- to post-CAE inferior corneal staining score (ICSS) of the study eye evaluated at week 8 .

Interventions

Ophthalmic Solution

DRUGplacebo

Ophthalmic Solution

Sponsors

Harbour BioMed (Guangzhou) Co. Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Have a history of use eye drops for dry eye symptoms within 6 months of Visit 1 or desire to use eye drops; 2. Have in the study eye a Schirmer's Test score of ≤ 10 mm and ≥ 1 mm at Visits 1 and 2; 3. Be willing and can adjust current treatment for dry eye according to the protocol, judged by the Investigator; 4. Must be willing to complete all study assessments required by the protocol.

Exclusion criteria

1. Be diagnosed with an ongoing ocular infection (bacterial, viral, or fungal), or active ocular inflammation at Visit 1; 2. Have previously had laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery within the last 12 months, or had femtosecond small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) within the last 12 months, or had phacoemulsification within the last 3 months, or had dry eye or aggravation of dry eye caused by other ocular operations has not been stable; 3. Have used ophthalmic cyclosporine A, tacrolimus or Xiidra® within 60 days prior to Visit 1;

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Inferior Corneal Staining (ICS) Score8 weeksInferior corneal staining score, assessed by Ora Calibra® Corneal and Conjunctival Fluorescein Staining Scale (0-4 point, higher is worse) Change from baseline in change from pre- to post- CAE at Visit 6 (higher is worse)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ocular Discomfort Score8 weeksOcular Discomfort Score, assessed by Ora Calibra® Ocular Discomfort Scale (0-4 point, higher is worse) Change from baseline in pre-CAE Ocular Discomfort Score at Visit 6 (higher is worse)

Countries

China

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
HBM9036 0.25% Ophthalmic Solution
HBM9036, Ophthalmic Solution, twice a day, in the morning and evening HBM9036 0.25% Ophthalmic Solution: Ophthalmic Solution
50
Placebo Ophthalmic Solution
placebo, Ophthalmic Solution, twice a day, in the morning and evening placebo: Ophthalmic Solution
50
Total100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHBM9036 0.25% Ophthalmic SolutionPlacebo Ophthalmic SolutionTotal
Age, Continuous41.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.19
43.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.15
42.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.25
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants32 Participants57 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
25 Participants18 Participants43 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 500 / 50
other
Total, other adverse events
14 / 5014 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Inferior Corneal Staining (ICS) Score

Inferior corneal staining score, assessed by Ora Calibra® Corneal and Conjunctival Fluorescein Staining Scale (0-4 point, higher is worse) Change from baseline in change from pre- to post- CAE at Visit 6 (higher is worse)

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: The analysis population is per-protocol population, which excluded a few patients.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HBM9036 0.25% Ophthalmic SolutionInferior Corneal Staining (ICS) Score1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.44
Placebo Ophthalmic SolutionInferior Corneal Staining (ICS) Score1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.46
Secondary

Ocular Discomfort Score

Ocular Discomfort Score, assessed by Ora Calibra® Ocular Discomfort Scale (0-4 point, higher is worse) Change from baseline in pre-CAE Ocular Discomfort Score at Visit 6 (higher is worse)

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HBM9036 0.25% Ophthalmic SolutionOcular Discomfort Score2.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.791
Placebo Ophthalmic SolutionOcular Discomfort Score3.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.692

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026