Skip to content

Genotypic Resistance-guided Versus Empirical Therapy for H. Pylori Eradication.

Genotypic Resistance-guided Triple Therapy Versus Empirical Concomitant Therapy for First-line H. Pylori Eradication.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04090021
Enrollment
304
Registered
2019-09-16
Start date
2019-09-01
Completion date
2020-02-28
Last updated
2019-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Helicobacter Pylori Infection

Keywords

H. pylori, genotypic resistance, tailored therapy, concomitant therapy

Brief summary

This study aims to investigate the efficacy of a 7-day genotypic resistance-guided triple therapy, compared with empirical concomitant therapy, for first-line eradication of H. pylori.

Detailed description

Empiric eradication of H. pylori becomes steadily more challenging because of increasing antibiotic resistance. In high-resistance countries where bismuth and/or tetracycline are unavailable (eg; Greece), non-bismuth quadruple therapies are currently recommended as first-line therapeutic options; however, eradication rates \>95% are infrequently achieved and even \>90% are disputed. Antimicrobial susceptibility-guided therapy is a promising alternative in order to maintain high therapeutic efficacy. However, traditional culture-based susceptibility testing methods have several shortcomings, including they are time-consuming and they do not 100% reflect in vivo eradication. Recent guidelines also recommend the use of molecular testing for evaluation of H. pylori antibiotic susceptibility. Nevertheless, the efficacy of genotypic resistance-guided treatment of H. pylori has been seldom appraised. Therefore, the investigators conducted this prospective randomized controlled trial aiming to investigate the efficacy of a 7-day genotypic resistance-guided triple therapy, compared with empirical concomitant therapy, for first-line eradication of H. pylori.

Interventions

DRUGEsomeprazole 40mg

Use in a drug combination for H. pylori eradication

Use in a drug combination for H. pylori eradication

Use in a drug combination for H. pylori eradication

Use in a drug combination for H. pylori eradication

Use in a drug combination for H. pylori eradication

Use in a drug combination for H. pylori eradication

Sponsors

Konstantopoulio-Patission General Hospital of Nea Ionia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Consecutive outpatients aged ≥18 years with documented H. pylori infection. Mental and legal ability to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* previous history of H. pylori eradication therapy * history of allergies to the medications used * previous esophageal or gastric surgery * serious systemic disease * pregnancy or lactation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of H. pylori eradicationAt least 6 weeks after treatment completionRate of H. pylori eradication by intention to treat/per protocol in each group at least 6 weeks after treatment completion using the urea breath test.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of adverse effectsAt least 6 weeks after treatment completionAdverse events were investigated by means of a structured clinical interview immediately after the completion of therapy. The subjects were asked to grade the severity of adverse events according to their influence on daily activities, experienced as mild (transient and well tolerated), moderate (causing discomfort and partially interfering with daily activities), or severe (causing considerable interference with daily activities).
Compliance ratesAt least 6 weeks after treatment completionDrug compliance was determined by counting unused medication. For this purpose, any tablet that was not consumed was brought back to the clinic for pill count. Poor compliance was defined as taking less than 80% of the total medication prescribed.

Countries

Greece

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026