Skip to content

Acupuncture Combined With Mindfulness: ACUMIND

Acupuncture Combined With Mindfulness in the Context of Chronic Pain

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04089319
Acronym
ACUMIND
Enrollment
30
Registered
2019-09-13
Start date
2019-09-01
Completion date
2021-05-03
Last updated
2021-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain

Keywords

Chronic Pain, Acupuncture, Mindfulness, Interoceptive Awareness

Brief summary

This study aims to gather preliminary data regarding acupuncture and mindfulness in the treatment of chronic pain.

Detailed description

Neither acupuncture nor mindfulness have been studied with respect to chronic pain in an outpatient integrative health (IH) oncology clinic in the USA. Likewise, the combination of acupuncture and mindfulness combined as not been studied. Given that both acupuncture and mindfulness have demonstrated some analgesic relief in an acute pain setting, each merit study for pain relief in an outpatient setting. The investigators are evaluating the impact of two different acupuncture approaches for patients reporting chronic pain. Acupuncture will be provided by a Licensed Acupuncturist for patients reporting chronic pain. Participants will be randomized to one of two treatments - acupuncture as usual or acupuncture plus mindfulness. The investigators will collect data regarding chronic pain, interoceptive awareness, emotion regulation, and acceptability. The study is open to participants with any etiology and any location of chronic pain.

Interventions

OTHERMusic recording

Participants will listen to music for 45 minutes while they rest with acupuncture needles in place.

OTHERMindfulness recording

Participants will listen to a recording of mindfulness for 15 minutes and then listen to music for 30 minutes while they rest with acupuncture needles in place.

Sponsors

Huntsman Cancer Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Utah
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
TRIPLE (Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient is age 18 or older. * Patient is experiencing pain (rated ≥3 on a 0-10 scale) lasting for three or more months. * Able to provide informed consent and willing to sign an approved consent form that conforms to federal and institutional guidelines. * ONLY FOR THOSE WITH A DIAGNOSIS OF CANCER: ECOG status of 0 (asymptomatic), 1 (symptomatic but completely ambulatory) or 2 (symptomatic, \<50% in bed during the day).

Exclusion criteria

* Patient has received 5 or more acupuncture treatments in the last 2 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Questions Regarding Pain and Other Symptoms2 monthsA questionnaire regarding pain as well as physical and mental awareness. A Likert scale 0-10 is used, where 0 is classified as not at all and 10 is classified very much. Higher values are a worse outcome with questions 7-9 reverse scored.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Nondual Awareness Dimensional Assessment2 monthsA questionnaire regarding nondual awareness. Scored on a 10-point Likert scale (1=Not at all, 10=Very Much), higher values are a better outcome.
State Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale2 monthsA questionnaire regarding emotional awareness. Scored on a 5 point Likert scale (1=not at all, 5=completely), higher values are a better outcome.
Sensation Manikin2 monthsA map of the body used to identify and measure areas of pleasant and unpleasant sensations.
State Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness-22 monthsA questionnaire regarding interoceptive awareness. Scored on a 6-point Likert scale (0=never, 5=always), higher values are a better outcome.
Retrospective Chart Review3 monthTo discover pain medications taken by participant in the last 90 days, including opioid dose (to be converted into morphine milligram equivalent, MME).
Acceptability Questions1 dayA questionnaire regarding the acceptability of the AT. This is scored on a 5 point Likert scale (1=completely disagree, 5=completely agree), higher values are a better outcome.
Qualitative Inquiry1 dayA questionnaire regarding experiences during the AT. This consists of free response questions.
Qualitative Interoceptive Awareness and Emotional Regulation1 dayA questionnaire regarding changes experienced since AT. This consists of open ended text questions.
Quantitative questions1 dayA questionnaire regarding overall health since AT. Questions 1-3 are scored on a Likert scale 0-10 is used where 0 is classified as not at all and 10 is classified very much with higher values indicating a better score and question 1 is reverse scored. Questions 4-8 are measured on a 5 point Likert scale (1=not at all, 5=completely) with higher values indicating a better outcome. Question 9 is scored on a 1-5 Likert scale with lower values indicating a better outcome. Questions 10-19 are scored on a 3 point Likert scale with higher values indicating a better outcome.
Acupuncture Questions2 monthsA questionnaire regarding changes in sensations experienced during the AT. This is scored on a 6-point Likert scale (0=not at all, 5=to all the time/every location), higher values are a better outcome.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026