Skip to content

Different Anesthetic Technique For ERCP

Deep Sedation and General Anesthesia for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04087668
Enrollment
405
Registered
2019-09-12
Start date
2019-09-01
Completion date
2019-12-30
Last updated
2023-05-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia; Adverse Effect

Keywords

ERCP, General anesthesia, Endoscopy, MAC

Brief summary

Providing the appropriate anesthetic technique for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in remote locations can be challenging. The aim of this study was therefore to prospectively assess and compare the feasibility of monitored anesthesia care (MAC) with propofol based deep sedation, standard general anesthesia and general anesthesia without neuromuscular blockade in patients undergoing ERCP.

Detailed description

ERCP is identified as one of the most invasive endoscopic procedures, during which patients may experience anxiety, discomfort and suffer different degree of pain. So, anesthesia and analgesia are essential for this invasive procedure, especially therapeutic ERCPs. Thus, we compared the efficacy of using monitored anesthesia care (MAC) with deep sedation versus general anesthesia (GA) to perform this procedure and the incidence of complications associated with these methods of anesthesia. Previous studies have concluded that intubation is possible without the use of neuromuscular blockade. We assume that the use of propofol and adjuvants short-acting opioids may provide adequate conditions for tracheal intubation. It was also hypothesized that it may also be useful in facilitating ERCP under general anesthesia without neuromuscular blockade.

Interventions

PROCEDUREMonitored Anesthesia Care

MAC was induced and maintained via the continuous infusion of propofol AND remifentanil using a target-controlled infusion (TCI) pump. The appropriate level of sedation was 65 to 80 points on BIS. The adjunctive sedatives (eg, fentanyl, midazolam) was at the discretion of the anesthesia team.

PROCEDUREGeneral Anesthesia

Induction was done with propofol (2 mg/kg) , cis-atracurium (0.15 mg/kg) , and fentanyl (5μg/kg). After orotracheal intubation, general anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane (1-1.3MAC) , propofol (3mg/kg/h), remifentanil (0.05-0.2 ug/kg/min) and repetitive doses of 0.1mg atracurium per kilogram were administered. After the procedure was completed, neostigmine mixed with atropine was used as a reversal agent for the neuromuscular blockade, and the patient was extubated when the recovery from anesthesia was confirmed.The BIS was 45 to 60 points .

PROCEDUREInduction Without Neuromuscular Blockade

Anaesthesia was induced with propofol (2 mg/kg), remifentanil(3 ug/kg) and 2% lidocaine (1 mg/kg). Nasotracheal intubation was performed 60 s after the administration. After intubation, general anesthesia was sevoflurane (1-1.3MAC) , propofol (3mg/kg/h), remifentanil (0.05-0.2 ug/kg/min). After the procedure was completed, the patient was extubated when the recovery from anesthesia was confirmed.The BIS was 45 to 60 points .

Sponsors

The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 18-70 years old * Grade Ⅰ and Ⅲ according to physical status classification system of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) * Coagulation function tests in normal range

Exclusion criteria

* Potentially difficult airways * Administration of sedative or narcotic drugs in the previous 24 hours * Severe renal or hepatic impairment * Severe cardiopulmonary comorbidities (defined as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status IV or greater) * Contraindications to a nasotracheal intubation * Coagulopathy * History of frequent episodes of epistaxis * Emergent ERCP * At risk for reflux and aspiration

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The overall complication ratewithin 72 hours of ERCPThe primary outcome was the overall pulmonary and cardiac complication rate.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedural failure rate of ERCPDuring the procedure
Conversion to GADuring the procedureConversion to general anesthesia
Temporary interruption rate of ERCPDuring the procedure
Procedure timeDuring the procedure
Premature termination rate of ERCPDuring the procedure
Room timeDuring the procedurePatient room-in to room-out time in the ERCP suite (room time).
Immediate Adverse Eventswithin 24 hours of ERCP
Delayed Adverse Eventswithin 72 hours of ERCP
Anesthesia timeDuring the procedure

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026