Skip to content

Effects of Motor Imagery in Pain Modulation and Median Nerve Mechanosensitive in Healthy Patients

Effects of Motor Imagery in Pain Modulation and Median Nerve Mechanosensitive in Healthy Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04086563
Enrollment
100
Registered
2019-09-11
Start date
2019-09-08
Completion date
2020-02-25
Last updated
2021-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Median Nerve Injury

Brief summary

The aim of this study are 1) to determinate the effectiveness of motor imagery or strength training in differens aspects of pain modulation. 2) evaluate the functional improvement of the hand by a motor imagery protocol.

Interventions

OTHERAction observation

look at a clip of a hand doing neurodynamic exercises.

OTHERMirror therapy

With a mirror glasses on, do the neurodynamic exercises with the non-dominant hand while the patient is looking at the dominant hand

active movement of the dominant hand. Do neurodynamic exercises.

OTHERStrength

Execute a short strength training for the dominant hand

Sponsors

Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy

Exclusion criteria

* be under 18 * any pathology which provoke pain.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neural mechanosensitiveChange from baseline at 2 weeksUpper Limb Neurodynamic test 1 (ULNT1)
Conditioned pain modulationChange from baseline at 2 weeksDiffused noxious inhibitory control system will be measure with tourniquet test
Pressure pain thresholdChange from baseline at 2 weeksThree consecutive trials of pressure pain threshold on the active trigger point at a rate of 1 kg/sec at intervals of 30 seconds were conducted.
Cold hyperalgesiaChange from baseline at 2 weeks10 seconds of a cold pack and after that, rating the pain from 0 to 10

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Strength_gripChange from baseline at 2 weeksgrip strength without pain
Psychological factors_KinesiophobiaChange from baseline at 2 weeksTampa Scale for Kinesiophobia. Total scores goes from 11 to 44.The higher values indicate worst outcomes.
Imagine movement capacityChange from baseline at 2 weekstesting the capacity of imagine that their own body is movement. Movement Imagery Questionnaire-Revised (MIQ-R questionaire). top score 56 and bottom score 8. The higher values indicates a better outcome.
Psychological factors_AnxietyChange from baseline at 2 weeksState Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T). Top score 60 and bottom score 0. The higher values indicate worst outcomes.
Psychological factors_DepressionChange from baseline at 2 weeksBeck Depression Inventory (BDI-II). the scores goes from 0 to 63. The higher values indicate worst outcomes. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II)

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026