Skip to content

Effects of a Ketogenic Diet on Psychological Outcomes

Effects of Ketonemia and Glycemia Variations During Ketogenic and Mediterranean Weight Loss Diets on Appetite Levels, Executive Functions and Mood

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04086498
Enrollment
50
Registered
2019-09-11
Start date
2015-04-01
Completion date
2016-06-15
Last updated
2019-09-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Appetitive Behavior, Mood, Overweight

Keywords

ketogenic diet, Mediterranean diet, ketones, glycaemia, executive functions

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to investigate how glycemia and ketonemia variations during three different diet protocols: a ketogenic diet without any restriction on calories intake (KD), a calorie-restricted ketogenic-mediterranean diet (KEMEPHY) and a calorie-restricted mediterranean diet (MD) affect appetite, executive functions and mood in overweight young women.

Detailed description

Fifty overweight young women with a body mass index (BMI) greater than 25 will be randomly assigned to a ten days of ketogenic diet (KD), calorie-restricted ketogenic-mediterranean diet (KEMEPHY) or Mediterranean diet (MD). All subjects will begin the prescribed diet at the beginning of their follicular phase. Body composition, fasting blood glucose and β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB), visual analogue scale (VAS) to test appetite as well as psychological tests (one mood test and two cognitive tasks) will be obtained 5 days before the beginning and on the last day of the diet-period.

Interventions

OTHERMediterranean diet

The group received a plan for a isocaloric Mediterranean Diet

OTHERKEMEPHY

The group received a plan for a ketogenic mediterranean with herbal extracts diet

OTHERKD

The group received a plan for a low carbohydrate ketogenic diet

Sponsors

University of Padova
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Raw data are encoded with 3 letters assigned to each treatment (A, B and C). Investigators and outcomes assessor do not have access to the waiting (letter-treatment)

Intervention model description

It is single blind, parallel arms study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* female sex age between 20 and 35 years, * 25\<BMI\>39.9 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

* smokers, * subjects under diet-treatment, * subjects treated for diseases such as diabetes, * cardiovascular diseases, * depression, * subjects doing sport more than 2 hours per week.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Motivation to eat and appetiteafter 8 weeksMotivation to eat and appetite were investigated by Visual Analog Scale (Hill & Blundell, 1982) , a test formed by 6 scales. Each scale was 10 cm long and was labelled with vertical lines and numbers (from 0 to10) every cm. Participants had to choose which part of the scale better described how they felt. The scale investigated appetite, fullness, desire to eat, how much would participant eat, urgency of eating and worries about food through 6 questions. Moreover, also the unfullness index (10 - fullness) was taken into account (R. J. Stubbs et al., 2000).
cognitive task1after 8 weeksThe working memory test was an adapted version of the visuo-spatial N-back (Cui, Bray, Bryant, Glover, & Reiss, 2011; Haberecht et al., 2001). It consisted in remembering the position of the letter o that, in each trial, could appear in different positions, since a 9-part grid divides the screen. Number of correct or incorrect answers will be counted
Cognitive task2after 8 weeksThe executive function test was an adapted version of the inhibitory control task (Amodio et al., 2010; Cona, Arcara, Amodio, Schiff, & Bisiacchi, 2013) . The stimulus were letters that appear in the centre of the screen. The task was formed by two main parts. In the first one the participant had to respond when the letter x or y appeared on the screen; in the second part the participant had to answer only when x preceded y and then vice versa. Number of correct or incorrect answers will be counted

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Moodafter 8 weeksThe mood test was the Italian Version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21. It was a self report measure formed by 21 items that reliably measure depression (lack of incentive, dysphoria and low self-esteem) as well as anxiety (somatic and subjective symptoms), stress (irritability, impatience, tension and arousal) and general distress (related to anxiety and depression) (Bottesi et al., 2015). The responses are given on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from zero if I strongly disagree to 3 if I totally agree.
body water contentafter 8 weeksBody composition will be assessed by body electrical impedance analysis (BIA) that measures Total body water and intra and extracellular water in liters
blood ketonesafter 8 weeksto assess diets' effects on ketonemia, capillary blood will be analyzed. We measure ketone in mol/L
blood glucoseafter 8 weeksto assess diets' effects on glycaemia, capillary blood will be analyzed. We measure glucose in mg/100ml
lean body massafter 8 weeksBody composition will be assessed by body electrical impedance analysis (BIA) that measures lean body mass in kg
fat body massafter 8 weeksBody composition will be assessed by body electrical impedance analysis (BIA) that measures fat body mass in kg

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026