Skip to content

A Study to Test the Long-term Safety of BI 655130 in Patients With Atopic Eczema Who Took Part in Study 1368-0032

An Open Label Extension Study to Assess the Long Term Safety of Treatment With BI 655130 Administered Subcutaneously in Adult Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04086121
Enrollment
14
Registered
2019-09-11
Start date
2019-09-24
Completion date
2022-02-23
Last updated
2025-02-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dermatitis, Atopic

Brief summary

To assess the long term safety and efficacy of treatment with BI 655130 in patients with AD who have completed and have responded to treatment in the parent study 1368-0032

Interventions

DRUGSpesolimab

Solution for SC injection

Sponsors

Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Signed and dated written informed consent in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and local legislation prior to the start of any screening procedures * Patients who completed the 1368-0032 trial and did not prematurely discontinue treatment prior to week 16, and; In the 1368-0032 re-allocation period (V7 to V11): * If an original non-responder from week 16 (V7), attained at least EASI 50 by last infusion (week 28) or by the EOS. * If an original responder from week 16 (V7) completed the last visit Week 28 (EOS) or dropped to a EASI 50 score prior to Week 28. * Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP)1 must be ready and able to use highly effective methods of birth control per ICH M3 (R2) that result in a low failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly for the duration of the trial and 16 weeks after last study drug administration. A list of contraception methods meeting these criteria is provided in the patient information.

Exclusion criteria

* Women who are pregnant, nursing, or who plan to become pregnant while in the trial. * Any new documented active or suspected malignancy except appropriately treated basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of uterine cervix. * Use of any restricted medication: or any drug considered likely to interfere with the safe conduct of the study, as assessed by the investigator. * Active systemic infections during the last two weeks prior to first drug administration. * Currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug trial, except for 1368-0032. * Any condition which would prevent the patient continuing on treatment in this trial 1368-0037 * Evidence of a current or previous disease, medical condition (including chronic alcohol or drug abuse or any condition) other than AD, surgical procedure, psychiatric or social problems, medical examination finding (including vital signs and ECG), or laboratory value at the screening outside the reference range that in the opinion of the investigator is clinically significant and would make the study participant unreliable to adhere to the protocol, comply with all study visits/procedures or to complete the trial, compromise the safety of the patient or compromise the quality of the data. * History of allergy/hypersensitivity to the systemically administered trial medication agent or its excipients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) at Week 48From first dose until Week 48, up to 48 weeks.Number of patients with treatment emergent adverse events (AEs) at week 48. The treatment emergent adverse event refer to the adverse event with an onset between start of treatment and end of the 16-week residual effect period after the last dose of trial medication.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage Change From Baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 48At baseline and at Week 48.The EASI scoring system is used routinely in patients with psoriasis to describe signs and severity of the disease. It assesses the extent of disease at four body sites and measures four clinical signs: erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification (each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe)). The EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores, resulting in the EASI score ranges from 0 (clear) to 72 (very severe), with higher score indicating more severe disease extent and clinical signs. The percent change from baseline in EASI is calculated as: (EASI at week 48 - EASI at baseline) / EASI at baseline \* 100%.
Percentage of Patients With a 50% Improvement From Baseline in EASI (EASI50) at Week 48At baseline and at Week 48.The EASI scoring system is used routinely in patients with psoriasis to describe signs and severity of the disease. It assesses the extent of disease at four body sites and measures four clinical signs: erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification (each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe)). The EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores, resulting in the EASI score ranges from 0 (clear) to 72 (very severe), with higher score indicating more severe disease extent and clinical signs. \[(EASI at week 48 - EASI at baseline) / EASI at baseline \* 100%\] ≥ 50%, then EASI50 = 1.
Percentage of Patients With a 75% Improvement From Baseline in EASI (EASI75) at Week 48At baseline and at Week 48.The EASI scoring system is used routinely in patients with psoriasis to describe signs and severity of the disease. It assesses the extent of disease at four body sites and measures four clinical signs: erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification (each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe)). The EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores, resulting in the EASI score ranges from 0 (clear) to 72 (very severe), with higher score indicating more severe disease extent and clinical signs. \[(EASI at week 48 - EASI at baseline) / EASI at baseline \* 100%\] ≥ 75%, then EASI75 = 1.
Change From Baseline in SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Week 48At baseline and at Week 48.The SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) index assesses elements: extent of disease, disease severity and subjective symptoms. The SCORAD consists of three elements: extent of disease, intensity of disease, and subjective symptoms (Pruritus and Sleep Loss). These 3 aspects: extent of disease (A: score range 0-1-2), disease severity (B: score range 0-18), and subjective symptoms (C: score range 0-20) combine using A/5 + 7\*B/2+ C to give a maximum possible score of 103 for SCORAD score. The SCORAD range from 0 (no disease) to 103 (severe disease). The higher the SCORAD score, the more severe the Atopic Dermatitis is.
Percentage of Patients Achieving at Least a 2-grade Reduction From Baseline to Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) in Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) at Week 48At baseline and at Week 48.The IGA scale allows investigators to assess overall disease severity at one given time point, and it consists of a five-point severity scale from clear to very severe disease (0= clear,1 =almost clear, 2 = mild disease, 3 = moderate disease, 4= severe disease). The IGA scale uses clinical characteristics of erythema, infiltration, papulation, oozing and crusting as guidelines for the overall severity assessment.

Countries

Canada, Japan, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This open label extension clinical trial was planned to offer all patients who completed the clinical trial 1368-0032 (NCT03822832) as planned, the option to continue to receive BI 655130 treatment if they have responded to treatment and meet all criteria for study entry.

Pre-assignment details

All subjects were screened for eligibility prior to participation in the trial. Subjects attended a specialist site which ensured that they (the subjects) strictly met all inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria. Subjects were not to be allocated to a treatment group if any of the entry criteria were violated.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Spesolimab 600 mg
600 milligrams (mg) solution for subcutaneous (SC) injection of BI 655130 (Spesolimab) were to administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks. All patients will return 16 weeks post the last treatment for an End of Study (EOS) visit.
14
Total14

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2
Overall StudyOther than listed8
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSpesolimab 600 mg
Age, Continuous48.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.8
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 14
other
Total, other adverse events
11 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) at Week 48

Number of patients with treatment emergent adverse events (AEs) at week 48. The treatment emergent adverse event refer to the adverse event with an onset between start of treatment and end of the 16-week residual effect period after the last dose of trial medication.

Time frame: From first dose until Week 48, up to 48 weeks.

Population: Safety analysis set (SAF): This patient set includes all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Spesolimab 600 mgNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) at Week 489 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Week 48

The SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) index assesses elements: extent of disease, disease severity and subjective symptoms. The SCORAD consists of three elements: extent of disease, intensity of disease, and subjective symptoms (Pruritus and Sleep Loss). These 3 aspects: extent of disease (A: score range 0-1-2), disease severity (B: score range 0-18), and subjective symptoms (C: score range 0-20) combine using A/5 + 7\*B/2+ C to give a maximum possible score of 103 for SCORAD score. The SCORAD range from 0 (no disease) to 103 (severe disease). The higher the SCORAD score, the more severe the Atopic Dermatitis is.

Time frame: At baseline and at Week 48.

Population: Full analysis set (FAS): This patient set includes all patients in the SAF who had a baseline measurement and at least one post-baseline measurement for the secondary endpoint, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Total Score.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Spesolimab 600 mgChange From Baseline in SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Week 48-10.07 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 66.04
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 48

The EASI scoring system is used routinely in patients with psoriasis to describe signs and severity of the disease. It assesses the extent of disease at four body sites and measures four clinical signs: erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification (each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe)). The EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores, resulting in the EASI score ranges from 0 (clear) to 72 (very severe), with higher score indicating more severe disease extent and clinical signs. The percent change from baseline in EASI is calculated as: (EASI at week 48 - EASI at baseline) / EASI at baseline \* 100%.

Time frame: At baseline and at Week 48.

Population: Full analysis set (FAS): This patient set includes all patients in the SAF who had a baseline measurement and at least one post-baseline measurement for the secondary endpoint, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Total Score.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Spesolimab 600 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 48-3.74 Percent changeStandard Deviation 81.99
Secondary

Percentage of Patients Achieving at Least a 2-grade Reduction From Baseline to Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) in Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) at Week 48

The IGA scale allows investigators to assess overall disease severity at one given time point, and it consists of a five-point severity scale from clear to very severe disease (0= clear,1 =almost clear, 2 = mild disease, 3 = moderate disease, 4= severe disease). The IGA scale uses clinical characteristics of erythema, infiltration, papulation, oozing and crusting as guidelines for the overall severity assessment.

Time frame: At baseline and at Week 48.

Population: Full analysis set (FAS): This patient set includes all patients in the SAF who had a baseline measurement and at least one post-baseline measurement for the secondary endpoint, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Total Score.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Spesolimab 600 mgPercentage of Patients Achieving at Least a 2-grade Reduction From Baseline to Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) in Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) at Week 4822.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With a 50% Improvement From Baseline in EASI (EASI50) at Week 48

The EASI scoring system is used routinely in patients with psoriasis to describe signs and severity of the disease. It assesses the extent of disease at four body sites and measures four clinical signs: erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification (each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe)). The EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores, resulting in the EASI score ranges from 0 (clear) to 72 (very severe), with higher score indicating more severe disease extent and clinical signs. \[(EASI at week 48 - EASI at baseline) / EASI at baseline \* 100%\] ≥ 50%, then EASI50 = 1.

Time frame: At baseline and at Week 48.

Population: Full analysis set (FAS): This patient set includes all patients in the SAF who had a baseline measurement and at least one post-baseline measurement for the secondary endpoint, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Total Score.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Spesolimab 600 mgPercentage of Patients With a 50% Improvement From Baseline in EASI (EASI50) at Week 4833.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With a 75% Improvement From Baseline in EASI (EASI75) at Week 48

The EASI scoring system is used routinely in patients with psoriasis to describe signs and severity of the disease. It assesses the extent of disease at four body sites and measures four clinical signs: erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification (each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe)). The EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores, resulting in the EASI score ranges from 0 (clear) to 72 (very severe), with higher score indicating more severe disease extent and clinical signs. \[(EASI at week 48 - EASI at baseline) / EASI at baseline \* 100%\] ≥ 75%, then EASI75 = 1.

Time frame: At baseline and at Week 48.

Population: Full analysis set (FAS): This patient set includes all patients in the SAF who had a baseline measurement and at least one post-baseline measurement for the secondary endpoint, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Total Score.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Spesolimab 600 mgPercentage of Patients With a 75% Improvement From Baseline in EASI (EASI75) at Week 4822.2 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026