Skip to content

Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Methyl Aminolevulinate Hydrochloride (MAL) 16.8% Cream (CD06809-41) Versus Vehicle Cream for Actinic Keratosis of the Face

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Methyl Aminolevulinate Hydrochloride (MAL) 16.8% Cream (CD06809-41) Versus Vehicle Cream in the Treatment of Thin and Moderately Thick, Non-hyperkeratotic, Non-pigmented Actinic Keratosis (AK) of the Face and Scalp When Using Daylight Photodynamic Therapy (DL-PDT)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04085367
Enrollment
557
Registered
2019-09-11
Start date
2019-09-30
Completion date
2021-04-07
Last updated
2022-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Actinic Keratoses

Brief summary

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Methyl aminolevulinate hydrochloride (MAL) 16.8% cream (CD06809-41) versus vehicle cream in the treatment of thin and moderately thick, non-hyperkeratotic, non-pigmented actinic keratosis of the face and scalp when using daylight photodynamic therapy (DL-PDT).

Detailed description

This was a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, multicenter, parallel-group study in adult participants with clinically-confirmed mild to moderate AKs on the face and the balding scalp, to be conducted at approximately 60 clinical sites in the United States. Sites were selected to ensure that diverse daylight conditions represented in the study to understand the effects of latitude, elevation, and climate.

Interventions

DRUGMAL 16.8% cream

Day light photodynamic therapy with MAL 16.8% cream

DRUGMAL Vehicle Cream

Day light photodynamic therapy with MAL vehicle cream

Sponsors

Galderma R&D
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants aged ≥ 18 years at the Screening visit. * Participants had at least 4, but no more than 12, clinically-confirmed thin or moderately thick, non-hyperkeratotic, non-pigmented AKs located on the face (e.g., forehead, cheek, chin), and balding scalp. * Female Participants of non-childbearing potential. * Participants fully understood and signed an ICF before any investigational procedure(s) are performed.

Exclusion criteria

* Participants with pigmented AK in the treatment areas. * Female participants who were pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy during the study. * Participants with a clinical diagnosis of a skin disease other than AK. * Immunocompromised participants. * Participants with any condition that may be associated with a risk of poor protocol compliance.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response at Week 12Week 12Complete response was defined as clearance of all AK lesion treated, at week 12 after the last Daylight photodynamic therapy (DL-PDT).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in Lesion Complete Response at Week 12Baseline, Week 12Lesion complete response was defined as percent reduction from baseline in the number of cleared treated lesions, at 12 weeks after the last DL-PDT treatment. This outcome measure was analyzed as an intra-individual comparison between MAL cream and Vehicle cream.
Percentage of Participants With Partial Response at Week 12Week 12Participants achieving partial response was defined as participants with 75% or greater reduction from baseline in the number of cleared treated lesions, at 12 weeks after the last DL-PDT treatment, comparing MAL cream with vehicle cream.

Countries

Puerto Rico, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 557 participants were randomized in 2:1 ratio in two treatment group, MAL 16.8% cream and vehicle cream in study centers in the United States with diverse latitude, altitude, and climate characteristics.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
MAL 16.8% Cream
Participants received two treatment session at least 2 weeks apart. Investigator applied a thin layer of methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) hydrochloride 16.8% cream to each lesion during treatment. At 30 minutes after cream application, participants went outside in daylight for 2 hours (Daylight photodynamic therapy \[DL-PDT\]). After this time, the cream was removed by investigative site personnel by washing the skin with gentle skin cleanser.
364
MAL Vehicle Cream
Participants received two treatment session at least 2 weeks apart. Investigator applied a thin layer of vehicle cream to each lesion during treatment. At 30 minutes after cream application, participants went outside in daylight for 2 hours (DL-PDT). After this time, the cream was removed by investigative site personnel by washing the skin with gentle skin cleanser.
193
Total557

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event11
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up31
Overall StudyOther unspecified21
Overall StudyStatus Unknown11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject134

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMAL Vehicle CreamTotalMAL 16.8% Cream
Age, Continuous68.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
69.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.83
69.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.75
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
15 Participants48 Participants33 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
177 Participants504 Participants327 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants5 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
192 Participants551 Participants359 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
61 Participants159 Participants98 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
132 Participants398 Participants266 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 3640 / 193
other
Total, other adverse events
89 / 36441 / 193
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 3641 / 193

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response at Week 12

Complete response was defined as clearance of all AK lesion treated, at week 12 after the last Daylight photodynamic therapy (DL-PDT).

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT analysis population included all participants randomized in the study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MAL 16.8% CreamPercentage of Participants With Complete Response at Week 1225.3 percentage of participants
MAL Vehicle CreamPercentage of Participants With Complete Response at Week 1223.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Partial Response at Week 12

Participants achieving partial response was defined as participants with 75% or greater reduction from baseline in the number of cleared treated lesions, at 12 weeks after the last DL-PDT treatment, comparing MAL cream with vehicle cream.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT analysis population included all participants randomized in the study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MAL 16.8% CreamPercentage of Participants With Partial Response at Week 1248.2 percentage of participants
MAL Vehicle CreamPercentage of Participants With Partial Response at Week 1235.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Lesion Complete Response at Week 12

Lesion complete response was defined as percent reduction from baseline in the number of cleared treated lesions, at 12 weeks after the last DL-PDT treatment. This outcome measure was analyzed as an intra-individual comparison between MAL cream and Vehicle cream.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: ITT analysis population included all participants randomized in the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MAL 16.8% CreamPercent Change From Baseline in Lesion Complete Response at Week 12-61.1 percent changeStandard Error 1.79
MAL Vehicle CreamPercent Change From Baseline in Lesion Complete Response at Week 12-49.4 percent changeStandard Error 2.45

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026