Skip to content

Ropivacaine/Dexamethasone and 10% Lignocaine Injection in GPN Block for Intractable Cancer Pain

Comparison Between Ropivacaine/Dexamethasone and 10% Lignocaine Injection in Distal Glossopharyngeal Nerve Block for Intractable Cancer Pain- A Randomized Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04085120
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-09-11
Start date
2019-08-23
Completion date
2020-02-28
Last updated
2019-09-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer, Oropharynx, Cancer Pain, Pain, Intractable

Brief summary

The study will compare the efficacy and safety of Ropivacaine/dexamethasone vs 10% lignocaine injection in distal glossopharyngeal nerve block for intractable cancer pain

Interventions

PROCEDURE0.75 % Ropivacaine/ 4mg/mL dexamethasone injection

Distal glossopharyngeal nerve in the neck will be blocked by using 0.75 % Ropivacaine/ 4mg/mL dexamethasone injection

PROCEDURE10% lignocaine injection

Distal glossopharyngeal nerve in the neck will be blocked by using 10% lignocaine injection

Sponsors

All India Institute of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with proven carcinoma of the oropharynx and supraglottic larynx with estimated survival of 3 months or more. * Pain lasting for at least 2 weeks with an average intensity of 5 or more on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) refractory to a combination strong opioids and NSAIDS

Exclusion criteria

1. Local infection or skin ulceration at the puncture site 2. Local anaesthetic allergy 3. Psychiatric illness that affected cooperation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain reduction on the basis of the Numeric rating scale (NRS).4 weeksPain reduction on the basis of the Numeric rating scale (NRS). From 0 to 10 (No pain to highest pain)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)- short form4 weeksBPI scores will be used to assess the change in pain before and after treatment. (Likert scale of 0 to 10, where 0 is none to 10 is maximum)
WHO Quality of Life-BREF4 weeksWHO Quality of Life-BREF scores will be used to assess change in quality of life before and after treatment. (Likert scale of 0 to 5, where 0 is no interference to quality of life and 5 is maximum).
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)4 weeeksNumber of Participants With Treatment Success at the End of Therapy as Measured by the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). A treatment success is defined as Much or Very Much Improved at the Week 4. The PGIC is a 7-point Likert Scale, ranging from very much worse to very much improved
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC)4 weeksNumber of Participants With Treatment Success at the End of Therapy Based on Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) . A treatment success is defined as Much or Very Much Improved at the Week 4. The PGIC is a 7-point Likert Scale, ranging from very much worse to very much improve.
Analgesic requirement and rescue analgesic requirement4 weeksThe number and dose of drugs before and after treatment will be assessed.

Countries

India

Contacts

Primary ContactDinesh Manoharan, MD
dineshkimi@gmail.com918447857079

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026