Osteoarthritis, Hip, Osteoarthritis, Knee
Conditions
Keywords
Exercise
Brief summary
In this project, a web-based exercise program is developed in co-creation between specialized health care, the Norwegian Association for Rheumatic diseases (NRF) and a group of experienced patient representatives. The project emerges from the evidence that exercise is recommended as first-line treatment for patients with chronic diseases like hip- and knee-osteoarthritis (OA). However, the number of patients in need of targeted exercise will increase considerably the next decades, and their treatment needs cannot be fully handled within the health care system. Development of innovative and effective treatment trajectories and follow-up strategies is urgently required. Peer-support is recognized as an effective way to increase patients' long-term adherence to exercise. Thus, patient-organizations may be an unutilized resource in support and follow-up of patients who need long-term exercise as part of their treatment plan. After discharge from examination in hospital, patients with hip/knee OA will be recruited to follow-up in a novel web-based, peer-supported exercise program, and the feasibility of the intervention will be evaluated.
Detailed description
The study will be conducted as a pre-post single-arm feasibility study comprising 50 participants. The main objective of the study will be to evaluate the feasibility of the web-based, peer-supported exercise intervention in patients with hip and/or knee OA. Specific research objectives are: * to assess feasibility of intervention delivery, data collection, eligibility and inclusion/exclusion criteria and intervention fidelity * to assess the responsiveness of relevant primary and secondary outcome measures In the feasibility study, all participants will be allocated to an intervention group, receiving a 12-week web-based, peer-supported aerobic exercise program including weekly motivational messages. Patients between 40 and 80 years of age that are not candidates for surgery will be recruited from Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway. To assess and evaluate feasibility, we will report on descriptive statistics. Responsiveness will be assessed using Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) analyses.
Interventions
OTHERExercise
Participants will be offered to take part in a 5-hour Learning and Mastery-course at Diakonhjemmet Hospital, receiving information about the osteoarthritis disease, symptoms and the importance of exercise and physical activity. Participants will then be given a weekly web-based exercise program (12 weeks) consisting of three aerobic exercise sessions per week. The exercise program consists of five levels, and the participants will each week be guided to the most appropriate level based on their measured physical fitness level and the weekly exercise diary. The participants will at initial assessment at Diakonhjemmet Hospital be instructed to use Borgs scale to adjust exercise level. Based on the weekly exercise diary the participants will also get motivational messages by email.
Sponsors
The Norwegian Rheumatism Association
University of Melbourne
Extrastiftelsen
Diakonhjemmet Hospital
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
A pre-post single arm feasibility study
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
• patients with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis being referred to Diakonhjemmet Hospital
Exclusion criteria
* candidate for surgery * unable to understand or write Norwegian * unable to walk unaided and continuously for 15 minutes * absolute or relative contradictions to maximal exercise testing * have relatives with sudden death before 40 years of age * have first-degree relatives with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility: time resources used by peer-supporters | baseline to 12 weeks | Time (hours/minutes) per participant-peer-support contact (frequency of contacts divided by total time used by peer-supporters). |
| Feasibility: time resources used on the exercise program delivery | baseline to 12 weeks | Time (hours/minutes) per week per participant used on web-based exercise program delivery. |
| Feasibility: time resources used on motivational messages delivery | baseline to 12 weeks | Time (hours/minutes) per week per participant used on motivational message delivery. |
| Feasibility: proportion of received exercise diaries | baseline to 12 weeks | Proportion of received exercise diaries (0-12 per participant). |
| Feasibility: proportion wearing the activity monitor | baseline | Proportion of participants providing activity monitor data (at least 4 days, including one weekend day, with minimum 10 hours recording per day) at baseline. |
| Feasibility: proportion completing treadmill test | baseline | Proportion of participants completing the indirect maximal cardiorespiratory exercise test according to test-protocol at baseline. |
| Eligible: proportion eligible | baseline | Proportion of potentially eligible participants approached that are invited. |
| Recruitment: proportion enrolled | baseline | Proportion of eligible patients enrolled. |
| Retention: proportion of enrolled participants | baseline and 12 weeks | Proportion of enrolled participants providing data at 12 week post-test. |
| Adverse events: number of adverse events | 12 weeks | Total number of adverse events (by cause if possible) evaluated by answers at post-test: The four questions addressing possible adverse events: 1) Have you carried out any type of treatment during the last 3 months? (With treatment we mean medication, physical exercise, self-management course or any alternative treatments) (yes/no), 2) If yes, have you experienced any adverse event as a result of the treatment? (yes/no). 3) If yes, which adverse events as a result of treatment? 4) In your opinion, which treatment(s) do you think the adverse event was/were caused by? (medication, physical exercise, self-management course, alternative treatments, other) (Elaborate). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) | baseline and 12 weeks | EQ-5D-5L will be used for measuring health-related quality of life (www.euroqol.org): comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels of answers (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems). The average score on each dimension will be reported, and the total score can be calculated into an index value ranging from -0.59 to 1, where -0.59 represents worst possible state and 1 represents perfect health. |
| Change in Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES) | baseline and 12 weeks | Measured by Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES): comprises 11 items addressing pain and symptoms (scored on a 5-point scale ranging from not confident at all to very confident). The scores are summed up to a 0-100 score where higher score indicate better self-efficacy. |
| Change in exercise self-efficacy | baseline and 12 weeks | Measured by Exercise Beliefs and Exercise Habits questionnaire: comprises 20 items addressing exercise self-efficacy (4 items), barriers to exercise (3 items), benefits of exercise (5 items), and impact of exercise on arthritis (8 items), scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. The scores on each subscale is summed up where higher scores indicate better self-efficacy. |
| Changes in objectively measured physical activity | baseline and 12 weeks | Assessed by accelerometer (ActiGraph GT3X+): Change in physical activity level measured as counts per minute (CPM), which is the total number of registered counts for all valid days divided by wear time. Thresholds for CPM will be used in calculation of time (minutes per week/day) spent on sitting (\<100 CPM), and on light (100-2019 CPM), moderate-(\>2019-5998 CPM) and vigorous (\>5998) intensity physical activity. |
| Change in physical fitness (VO2 peak) | baseline and 12 weeks | Change in VO2 peak measured by indirect maximal cardiorespiratory exercise test (modified Balke-protocol). The indirect estimation of VO2 peak by prediction equations is based on incline, grade and speed at end stage, weight and age. |
| Change in Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) | baseline and 12 weeks | Change in the last week disability on five subscales; pain (10 items, scale 0-40), symptoms (5 items, scale 0-20), function in daily living (17 items, scale 0-68), function in sport and recreation (4 items, scale 0-16) and quality of life (4 items, scale 0-16). Items are scored by a five-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (least severe) to 4 (most severe). Total sum-score and subscale sum-scores will be converted to normalized scores ranging from 0 (extreme disability) to 100 (no disability). |
| Change in Knee disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) | baseline and 12 weeks | Change in the last week disability on five subscales; pain (9 items, scale 0-36), symptoms (7 items, scale 0-28), function in daily living (17 items, scale 0-68), function in sport and recreation (5 items, scale 0-20) and quality of life (4 items, scale 0-16). Items are scored by a five-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (least severe) to 4 (most severe). Total sum-score and subscale sum-scores will be converted to normalized scores ranging from 0 (extreme disability) to 100 (no disability). |
| Change in Patient-specific functional scale (PSFS) | baseline and 12 weeks | Patients will address one to three activities they have problems performing due to osteoarthritis. The degree of difficulty with performing these activities is rated from 0 (cannot perform the activity) to 10 (no problems). |
| Change in self-reported physical activity (International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form) | baseline and 12 weeks | Measured by The International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form: Change in time (minutes per week/day) and Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET-minutes per week/day) spent on sitting, walking, and moderate- and vigorous intensity physical activity the last week (0-7 days). METs are calculated by using the corresponding MET-values for walking (3.3 MET), and moderate-(4.0 MET) and vigorous (8.0 MET) intensity physical activity. |
| Change in self-reported physical activity (HUNT) | baseline and 12 weeks | Measured by the three questions from the Nord-Trøndelag Health study (HUNT): change in average frequency (never/\<1 per week/1 per week/2-3 per week/almost every day), intensity (easy without losing my breath or breaking into a sweat/so hard that I lose my breath and break into a sweat/I push myself to near-exhaustion) and duration (less than 15 minutes/15-29 minutes/30 minutes to 1 hour/more than 1 hour) of physical activity. |
| Change in self-reported pain intensity the last week | baseline and 12 weeks | Measured by numeric rating scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). |
| Change in self-reported fatigue the last week | baseline and 12 weeks | Measured by numeric rating scale ranging from 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (worst fatigue). |
| Change in self-reported disease activity the last week | baseline and 12 weeks | Measured by numeric rating scale ranging from 0 (good, no symptoms) to 10 (very bad, much symptoms). |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Participant fidelity (adherence): frequency of exercise weeks | baseline to 12 weeks | Total number of weeks with minimum one exercise session. |
| Participant fidelity: proportion attending learning and mastery-course | baseline to 12 weeks | Proportion of enrolled participants attending a 5-hour osteoarthritis learning and mastery-course (attendance registered by yes/no). |
| Participant fidelity (adherence): frequency of exercise | baseline to 12 weeks | Total number of exercise sessions. |
| Participant fidelity (adherence): frequency of exercise per week | baseline to 12 weeks | Average number of exercise sessions per week. |
| Participant fidelity (adherence): duration of exercise sessions | baseline to 12 weeks | Total number of exercise sessions completed according to prescribed duration. Measured by a question about completion of the prescribed exercise-session (yes/no). |
| Participant fidelity (adherence): intensity of exercise sessions | baseline to 12 weeks | Total number of exercise sessions completed according to prescribed intensity. Measured by self-reported Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale (Borg RPE) ranging from 6 (resting) to 20 (maximal intensity). |
| Use of health care resources due to musculoskeletal pain | baseline | Registered by self-report: 1) frequency (number of consultations the last 6 months) with a general practitioner and specialist health care (rheumatologist, orthopedist, neurologist, other), 2) referred (yes/no, the last 6 months) to x-ray, magnetic resonance imaging, physiotherapist, healthy life center, occupational therapist, 3) frequency (number of consultations during the last 6 months) with a physiotherapist, manual therapist, chiropractor, alternative treatment, other due, 4) had a stay at a rehabilitation institution during the last 6 months (yes/no and number of days). Descriptive data will be reported. |
| Use of medication due to musculoskeletal pain | baseline | Registered by self-report: Frequency (never/\<1 per month/monthly/weekly/daily/several times per day) of medication use (addressing pain, sleeping, depression, anxiety) the last 3 months will be self-reported through type, name and dosage (mg) of medication, in addition to use of other medication (yes/no) and type. Descriptive data will be reported. |
| Osteoarthritis pain on a Global Rating of Change scale | 12 weeks | Change in osteoarthritis pain (from baseline to post-test) measured by a 7-point Global Rating of Change scale ranging from -3 (much worse) to +3 (much better). |
Countries
Norway
Outcome results
None listed