Skip to content

A Study Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Optimum Dosage of K-161 in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Dry Eye Disease

A Study Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Optimum Dosage of K-161 in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Dry Eye Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04084483
Enrollment
238
Registered
2019-09-10
Start date
2019-08-04
Completion date
2020-01-09
Last updated
2023-03-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye Disease

Brief summary

The objective of the study is to assess the safety, efficacy, optimum dosage, and dosing regimen of K-161 in adult subjects with moderate to severe dry eye disease.

Interventions

DRUGK-161

K-161 alternate dosage

Placebo solution

Sponsors

Kowa Research Institute, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Be at least 18 years of age at the time of informed consent visit. * Have a reported history of dry eye disease in both eyes and a history of eye drop use for dry eye symptoms. * Meet all inclusion criteria outlined in the clinical study protocol.

Exclusion criteria

* Have any clinically significant ocular condition. * Have a history of corneal refractive surgery and/or any other ocular surgical procedure within 12 months. * Must not meet any other

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Inferior Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score Post Controlled Adverse Environment (Post-Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE))Baseline to Day 29Fluorescein Staining is measured with the Ora Calibra® Corneal and Conjunctival Staining Scale which is a 0 to 4 scale with increasing half-units and where higher numbers indicating more severe staining. K-161 compared to Vehicle. When study patients are exposed to Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE) in terms of relative humidity, temperature, airflow, and visual tasking, the ocular surface is stressed to react. This controlled environmental stress creates a consistent response that's reproducible over time.
Change in Ocular Discomfort Scale Post-CAEBaseline to Day 29Ocular discomfort scores were subjectively graded by the subjects using the Ora Calibra® Ocular Discomfort Scale from 0 to 4 where 0 = No Discomfort and 4 = Constant Discomfort.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Fluorescein Staining Scores (Pre-CAE®)Baseline to Day 29Fluorescein Staining is measured with the Ora Calibra® Corneal and Conjunctival Staining Scale which is a 0 to 4 scale with increasing half-units and where higher numbers indicating more severe staining.
Change in Lissamine Green Staining (Pre-CAE) Using the Ora Calibra® Scale (Conjunctival Sum)Baseline to Day 29Ora Calibra Scale which is 0 to 4 scale with increasing half-units and where higher numbers indicating more severe staining.
Change in Conjunctival Redness (Pre-CAE)Baseline to Day 29Conjunctival Redness Scale ranges from 0 to 4, where 0 = normal, without vasodilation and 4 = Broad Ciliary and Prominent, Horizontal Conjunctival Vasodilation. Higher scores indicate worsening conjunctival redness.
Change in Tear Film Break-Up Time (Pre CAE)Baseline to Day 29
Change in Tear Osmolarity (Pre CAE)Baseline to Day 29
Change in Schirmer's Test Value (Unanesthetized) Pre-CAEBaseline to Day 29Measured with Schirmer's test strip with the length of the moistened area recorded in mm. Lower values indicate less tears produced in the eye.
Change in Blink Rate (Pre CAE)Baseline to Day 29Blinks per 60 seconds.
Change in Ocular Discomfort Scale (Pre CAE)Baseline to Day 29Ora Calibra® Ocular Discomfort Scale ranging from 0 to 4
Change in Ocular Discomfort and 4-Symptom Questionnaire (Pre CAE)Baseline to Day 29Scores ranging from 0 to 5. A score of 0 indicates no discomfort/symptoms and a score of 5 indicates worst discomfort/symptoms.
Change in Visual Analog Scale (Pre CAE)Baseline to Day 29The length of the assessment line was 100 mm; a measure of 0 mm corresponded to no discomfort and 100 mm corresponds to maximal discomfort.
Change in Ocular Surface Disease Index Score (Pre-CAE) - Total OSDIBaseline to Day 29The OSDI© is comprised of 12 questions, with each question assessed on a scale ranging from 0 to 4 where 0 = none of the time, 1 = some of the time, 2 = half of the time, 3 = most of the time, and 4 = all of the time. The range of total score is 0 to 100. Subscale scores are not reported. Higher score represents a worsen outcome. The total score is the sum of subscales.
Change in Unanesthetized Schirmer's Test (Pre CAE)Baseline to Day 29Measured with Schirmer's test strip with the length of the moistened area recorded in mm. Lower values indicate less tears produced in the eye.
Change in Tear Film Break-up Time (TFBUT) Post-CAEBaseline to Day 29

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

During the screening period, two 90-minute exposures to the CAE® were conducted to ascertain eligibility to enter the study. Participants who qualified after the initial screening visit entered the run-in phase, where they self-administered Vehicle for approximately 14 days. Those who qualified at Visit 2 (Day 1) were randomized to receive study drug in a double-masked fashion for 28 days.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo (BID) (Vehicle)
1 drop Ophthalmic Solution
59
0.025% K-161 (BID)
1 drop Ophthalmic Solution
59
0.1% K-161 (BID)
1 drop Ophthalmic Solution
61
0.1% K-161 (QID)
1 drop Ophthalmic Solution
59
Total238

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo (BID) (Vehicle)0.025% K-161 (BID)0.1% K-161 (BID)0.1% K-161 (QID)Total
Age, Customized
< 65 years
34 Participants37 Participants38 Participants38 Participants147 Participants
Age, Customized
≥ 65 years
25 Participants22 Participants23 Participants21 Participants91 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
58 Participants58 Participants60 Participants58 Participants234 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Inferior Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score Post Controlled Adverse Environment (Post-CAE)3.30 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.361
3.36 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.405
3.35 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.412
3.33 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.378
3.33 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.388
Ocular Discomfort Scale Post-CAE3.8 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.49
3.7 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.48
3.7 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.61
3.6 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.72
3.7 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.58
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
13 Participants16 Participants12 Participants15 Participants56 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
15 Participants11 Participants10 Participants9 Participants45 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
29 Participants32 Participants37 Participants35 Participants133 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
41 Participants43 Participants44 Participants43 Participants171 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants16 Participants17 Participants16 Participants67 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 590 / 590 / 610 / 59
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 597 / 5925 / 6124 / 59
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 590 / 590 / 610 / 59

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Inferior Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score Post Controlled Adverse Environment (Post-Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE))

Fluorescein Staining is measured with the Ora Calibra® Corneal and Conjunctival Staining Scale which is a 0 to 4 scale with increasing half-units and where higher numbers indicating more severe staining. K-161 compared to Vehicle. When study patients are exposed to Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE) in terms of relative humidity, temperature, airflow, and visual tasking, the ocular surface is stressed to react. This controlled environmental stress creates a consistent response that's reproducible over time.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 29

Population: Endpoints analysis was determined by comparing 0.1% K-161 BID to its Vehicle BID

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (BID) (Vehicle)Change in Inferior Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score Post Controlled Adverse Environment (Post-Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE))-0.57 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.075
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Inferior Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score Post Controlled Adverse Environment (Post-Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE))-0.44 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.073
p-value: 0.2175ANCOVA
Primary

Change in Ocular Discomfort Scale Post-CAE

Ocular discomfort scores were subjectively graded by the subjects using the Ora Calibra® Ocular Discomfort Scale from 0 to 4 where 0 = No Discomfort and 4 = Constant Discomfort.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 29

Population: Endpoints analysis was determined by comparing 0.1% K-161 BID to its Vehicle BID

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (BID) (Vehicle)Change in Ocular Discomfort Scale Post-CAE0.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Ocular Discomfort Scale Post-CAE0.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
p-value: 0.3852ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Blink Rate (Pre CAE)

Blinks per 60 seconds.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 29

Population: Endpoints analysis was determined by comparing Vehicle BID to 0.1% K-161 BID and 0.025% K-161 BID

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (BID) (Vehicle)Change in Blink Rate (Pre CAE)0.1 Blinks per 60 secondsStandard Error 1.41
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Blink Rate (Pre CAE)0.1 Blinks per 60 secondsStandard Error 1.39
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Blink Rate (Pre CAE)-0.2 Blinks per 60 secondsStandard Error 1.36
p-value: 0.9829ANCOVA
p-value: 0.8675ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Conjunctival Redness (Pre-CAE)

Conjunctival Redness Scale ranges from 0 to 4, where 0 = normal, without vasodilation and 4 = Broad Ciliary and Prominent, Horizontal Conjunctival Vasodilation. Higher scores indicate worsening conjunctival redness.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 29

Population: Endpoints analysis was determined by comparing Vehicle BID to 0.1% K-161 BID and 0.025% K-161 BID

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (BID) (Vehicle)Change in Conjunctival Redness (Pre-CAE)-0.21 PointStandard Error 0.061
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Conjunctival Redness (Pre-CAE)-0.20 PointStandard Error 0.06
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Conjunctival Redness (Pre-CAE)-0.22 PointStandard Error 0.059
p-value: 0.9146ANCOVA
p-value: 0.8494ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Fluorescein Staining Scores (Pre-CAE®)

Fluorescein Staining is measured with the Ora Calibra® Corneal and Conjunctival Staining Scale which is a 0 to 4 scale with increasing half-units and where higher numbers indicating more severe staining.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 29

Population: Endpoints analysis was determined by comparing Vehicle BID to 0.1% K-161 BID and 0.025% K-161 BID

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (BID) (Vehicle)Change in Fluorescein Staining Scores (Pre-CAE®)Conjunctival Sum-0.03 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.138
Placebo (BID) (Vehicle)Change in Fluorescein Staining Scores (Pre-CAE®)Corneal Sum-0.28 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.184
Placebo (BID) (Vehicle)Change in Fluorescein Staining Scores (Pre-CAE®)Total Eye Sum-0.30 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.292
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Fluorescein Staining Scores (Pre-CAE®)Conjunctival Sum-0.22 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.136
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Fluorescein Staining Scores (Pre-CAE®)Corneal Sum-0.36 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.182
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Fluorescein Staining Scores (Pre-CAE®)Total Eye Sum-0.59 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Fluorescein Staining Scores (Pre-CAE®)Corneal Sum-0.50 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.178
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Fluorescein Staining Scores (Pre-CAE®)Total Eye Sum-0.80 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.283
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Fluorescein Staining Scores (Pre-CAE®)Conjunctival Sum-0.28 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.133
Comparison: Corneal Sump-value: 0.7388ANCOVA
Comparison: Corneal Sump-value: 0.3717ANCOVA
Comparison: Conjunctival Sump-value: 0.3164ANCOVA
Comparison: Conjunctival Sump-value: 0.1953ANCOVA
Comparison: Total Eye Sump-value: 0.4645ANCOVA
Comparison: Total Eye Sump-value: 0.2135ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Lissamine Green Staining (Pre-CAE) Using the Ora Calibra® Scale (Conjunctival Sum)

Ora Calibra Scale which is 0 to 4 scale with increasing half-units and where higher numbers indicating more severe staining.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 29

Population: Endpoints analysis was determined by comparing Vehicle BID to 0.1% K-161 BID and 0.025% K-161 BID

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (BID) (Vehicle)Change in Lissamine Green Staining (Pre-CAE) Using the Ora Calibra® Scale (Conjunctival Sum)-0.16 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.132
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Lissamine Green Staining (Pre-CAE) Using the Ora Calibra® Scale (Conjunctival Sum)-0.25 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.131
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Lissamine Green Staining (Pre-CAE) Using the Ora Calibra® Scale (Conjunctival Sum)-0.39 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.127
p-value: 0.599ANCOVA
p-value: 0.2122ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Ocular Discomfort and 4-Symptom Questionnaire (Pre CAE)

Scores ranging from 0 to 5. A score of 0 indicates no discomfort/symptoms and a score of 5 indicates worst discomfort/symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 29

Population: Endpoints analysis was determined by comparing Vehicle BID to 0.1% K-161 BID and 0.025% K-161 BID

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (BID) (Vehicle)Change in Ocular Discomfort and 4-Symptom Questionnaire (Pre CAE)Grittiness-0.1 PointStandard Error 0.15
Placebo (BID) (Vehicle)Change in Ocular Discomfort and 4-Symptom Questionnaire (Pre CAE)Dryness-0.1 PointStandard Error 0.14
Placebo (BID) (Vehicle)Change in Ocular Discomfort and 4-Symptom Questionnaire (Pre CAE)Ocular Discomfort-0.2 PointStandard Error 0.13
Placebo (BID) (Vehicle)Change in Ocular Discomfort and 4-Symptom Questionnaire (Pre CAE)Burning0.1 PointStandard Error 0.13
Placebo (BID) (Vehicle)Change in Ocular Discomfort and 4-Symptom Questionnaire (Pre CAE)Stinging-0.1 PointStandard Error 0.15
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Ocular Discomfort and 4-Symptom Questionnaire (Pre CAE)Dryness-0.2 PointStandard Error 0.14
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Ocular Discomfort and 4-Symptom Questionnaire (Pre CAE)Ocular Discomfort-0.2 PointStandard Error 0.13
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Ocular Discomfort and 4-Symptom Questionnaire (Pre CAE)Burning0.0 PointStandard Error 0.13
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Ocular Discomfort and 4-Symptom Questionnaire (Pre CAE)Grittiness-0.3 PointStandard Error 0.15
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Ocular Discomfort and 4-Symptom Questionnaire (Pre CAE)Stinging-0.1 PointStandard Error 0.15
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Ocular Discomfort and 4-Symptom Questionnaire (Pre CAE)Stinging-0.2 PointStandard Error 0.14
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Ocular Discomfort and 4-Symptom Questionnaire (Pre CAE)Grittiness-0.1 PointStandard Error 0.15
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Ocular Discomfort and 4-Symptom Questionnaire (Pre CAE)Ocular Discomfort-0.4 PointStandard Error 0.13
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Ocular Discomfort and 4-Symptom Questionnaire (Pre CAE)Dryness-0.3 PointStandard Error 0.13
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Ocular Discomfort and 4-Symptom Questionnaire (Pre CAE)Burning-0.1 PointStandard Error 0.13
Comparison: Ocular Discomfortp-value: 0.7367ANCOVA
Comparison: Ocular Discomfortp-value: 0.3865ANCOVA
Comparison: Burningp-value: 0.8796ANCOVA
Comparison: Burningp-value: 0.3515ANCOVA
Comparison: Drynessp-value: 0.6338ANCOVA
Comparison: Drynessp-value: 0.4685ANCOVA
Comparison: Grittinessp-value: 0.4757ANCOVA
Comparison: Grittinessp-value: 0.8803ANCOVA
Comparison: Stingingp-value: 0.8529ANCOVA
Comparison: Stingingp-value: 0.7713ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Ocular Discomfort Scale (Pre CAE)

Ora Calibra® Ocular Discomfort Scale ranging from 0 to 4

Time frame: Baseline to Day 29

Population: Endpoints analysis was determined by comparing Vehicle BID to 0.1% K-161 BID and 0.025% K-161 BID

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (BID) (Vehicle)Change in Ocular Discomfort Scale (Pre CAE)-0.3 ScoreStandard Error 0.13
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Ocular Discomfort Scale (Pre CAE)-0.2 ScoreStandard Error 0.13
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Ocular Discomfort Scale (Pre CAE)-0.5 ScoreStandard Error 0.12
p-value: 0.2352ANCOVA
p-value: 0.5836ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Ocular Surface Disease Index Score (Pre-CAE) - Total OSDI

The OSDI© is comprised of 12 questions, with each question assessed on a scale ranging from 0 to 4 where 0 = none of the time, 1 = some of the time, 2 = half of the time, 3 = most of the time, and 4 = all of the time. The range of total score is 0 to 100. Subscale scores are not reported. Higher score represents a worsen outcome. The total score is the sum of subscales.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 29

Population: Endpoints analysis was determined by comparing Vehicle BID to 0.1% K-161 BID and 0.025% K-161 BID

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (BID) (Vehicle)Change in Ocular Surface Disease Index Score (Pre-CAE) - Total OSDI-3.2 scores on a scaleStandard Error 2.03
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Ocular Surface Disease Index Score (Pre-CAE) - Total OSDI-2.9 scores on a scaleStandard Error 2
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Ocular Surface Disease Index Score (Pre-CAE) - Total OSDI-7.8 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.95
p-value: 0.9274ANCOVA
p-value: 0.0888ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Schirmer's Test Value (Unanesthetized) Pre-CAE

Measured with Schirmer's test strip with the length of the moistened area recorded in mm. Lower values indicate less tears produced in the eye.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 29

Population: Endpoints analysis was determined by comparing 0.1% K-161 BID to its Vehicle BID

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (BID) (Vehicle)Change in Schirmer's Test Value (Unanesthetized) Pre-CAE3.4 mmStandard Error 0.85
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Schirmer's Test Value (Unanesthetized) Pre-CAE2.2 mmStandard Error 0.8
p-value: 0.298ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Tear Film Break-Up Time (Pre CAE)

Time frame: Baseline to Day 29

Population: Endpoints analysis was determined by comparing Vehicle BID to 0.1% K-161 BID and 0.025% K-161 BID

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (BID) (Vehicle)Change in Tear Film Break-Up Time (Pre CAE)0.312 SecondsStandard Error 0.088
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Tear Film Break-Up Time (Pre CAE)0.398 SecondsStandard Error 0.0863
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Tear Film Break-Up Time (Pre CAE)0.242 SecondsStandard Error 0.0848
p-value: 0.4747ANCOVA
p-value: 0.5619ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Tear Film Break-up Time (TFBUT) Post-CAE

Time frame: Baseline to Day 29

Population: Endpoints analysis was determined by comparing 0.1% K-161 BID to its Vehicle BID

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (BID) (Vehicle)Change in Tear Film Break-up Time (TFBUT) Post-CAE0.402 SecondsStandard Error 0.109
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Tear Film Break-up Time (TFBUT) Post-CAE0.132 SecondsStandard Error 0.1049
p-value: 0.0634ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Tear Osmolarity (Pre CAE)

Time frame: Baseline to Day 29

Population: Endpoints analysis was determined by comparing Vehicle BID to 0.1% K-161 BID and 0.025% K-161 BID

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (BID) (Vehicle)Change in Tear Osmolarity (Pre CAE)-0.5 mOsm/LStandard Error 2.17
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Tear Osmolarity (Pre CAE)1.0 mOsm/LStandard Error 2.09
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Tear Osmolarity (Pre CAE)0.4 mOsm/LStandard Error 2.03
p-value: 0.5985ANCOVA
p-value: 0.7626ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Unanesthetized Schirmer's Test (Pre CAE)

Measured with Schirmer's test strip with the length of the moistened area recorded in mm. Lower values indicate less tears produced in the eye.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 29

Population: Endpoints analysis was determined by comparing Vehicle BID to 0.1% K-161 BID and 0.025% K-161 BID

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (BID) (Vehicle)Change in Unanesthetized Schirmer's Test (Pre CAE)3.3 mmStandard Error 0.82
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Unanesthetized Schirmer's Test (Pre CAE)3.1 mmStandard Error 0.8
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Unanesthetized Schirmer's Test (Pre CAE)2.1 mmStandard Error 0.78
p-value: 0.833ANCOVA
p-value: 0.2777ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Visual Analog Scale (Pre CAE)

The length of the assessment line was 100 mm; a measure of 0 mm corresponded to no discomfort and 100 mm corresponds to maximal discomfort.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 29

Population: Endpoints analysis was determined by comparing Vehicle BID to 0.1% K-161 BID and 0.025% K-161 BID

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (BID) (Vehicle)Change in Visual Analog Scale (Pre CAE)Itching-3.1 mmStandard Error 2.92
Placebo (BID) (Vehicle)Change in Visual Analog Scale (Pre CAE)Eye Dryness-4.1 mmStandard Error 2.71
Placebo (BID) (Vehicle)Change in Visual Analog Scale (Pre CAE)Blurry Vision-0.2 mmStandard Error 2.69
Placebo (BID) (Vehicle)Change in Visual Analog Scale (Pre CAE)Burning/Stinging-1.9 mmStandard Error 2.78
Placebo (BID) (Vehicle)Change in Visual Analog Scale (Pre CAE)Pain0.0 mmStandard Error 2.37
Placebo (BID) (Vehicle)Change in Visual Analog Scale (Pre CAE)Photophobia-2.8 mmStandard Error 2.78
Placebo (BID) (Vehicle)Change in Visual Analog Scale (Pre CAE)Foreign Body Sensation-1.1 mmStandard Error 2.96
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Visual Analog Scale (Pre CAE)Blurry Vision-5.5 mmStandard Error 2.67
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Visual Analog Scale (Pre CAE)Burning/Stinging-7.6 mmStandard Error 2.76
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Visual Analog Scale (Pre CAE)Itching-9.7 mmStandard Error 2.92
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Visual Analog Scale (Pre CAE)Foreign Body Sensation-6.9 mmStandard Error 2.94
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Visual Analog Scale (Pre CAE)Eye Dryness-6.1 mmStandard Error 2.68
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Visual Analog Scale (Pre CAE)Photophobia-6.2 mmStandard Error 2.75
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Visual Analog Scale (Pre CAE)Pain-6.0 mmStandard Error 2.37
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Visual Analog Scale (Pre CAE)Eye Dryness-10.7 mmStandard Error 2.6
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Visual Analog Scale (Pre CAE)Itching-6.1 mmStandard Error 2.84
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Visual Analog Scale (Pre CAE)Pain-4.2 mmStandard Error 2.28
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Visual Analog Scale (Pre CAE)Photophobia-10.7 mmStandard Error 2.67
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Visual Analog Scale (Pre CAE)Blurry Vision-7.5 mmStandard Error 2.6
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Visual Analog Scale (Pre CAE)Foreign Body Sensation-5.6 mmStandard Error 2.82
0.1% K-161 (BID)Change in Visual Analog Scale (Pre CAE)Burning/Stinging-5.6 mmStandard Error 2.68
Comparison: Burning/Stingingp-value: 0.138ANCOVA
Comparison: Burning/Stingingp-value: 0.3334ANCOVA
Comparison: Itchingp-value: 0.1008ANCOVA
Comparison: Itchingp-value: 0.4582ANCOVA
Comparison: Foreign Body Sensationp-value: 0.1511ANCOVA
Comparison: Foreign Body Sensationp-value: 0.2555ANCOVA
Comparison: Blurry Visionp-value: 0.1546ANCOVA
Comparison: Blurry Visionp-value: 0.0495ANCOVA
Comparison: Eye Drynessp-value: 0.5791ANCOVA
Comparison: Eye Drynessp-value: 0.0736ANCOVA
Comparison: Photophobiap-value: 0.3666ANCOVA
Comparison: Photophobiap-value: 0.039ANCOVA
Comparison: Painp-value: 0.0655ANCOVA
Comparison: Painp-value: 0.1947ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026