Skip to content

Effects of Different Bread Types in NCWS

The Effects of the Different Bread Types of Fully Known Composition on Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Individuals With Non-coeliac Wheat Sensitivity.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04084470
Acronym
BREAD
Enrollment
40
Registered
2019-09-10
Start date
2019-09-17
Completion date
2022-12-20
Last updated
2023-03-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-Coeliac Wheat Sensitivity (NCWS)

Keywords

Non-Coeliac Wheat Sensitivity, Wheat Sensitivity, Bread, Wheat, Gastrointestinal symptoms

Brief summary

Although wheat and gluten containing food products are generally considered to be healthy, a large number of individuals in the general population reduces or limits their intake and/or replaces wheat by other grains because of possible symptoms. This non-coeliac wheat sensitivity (NCWS) is accompanied by a range of (extra-)intestinal complaints soon after consuming wheat, which improve after wheat withdrawal. Evidence for a biological mechanism and for the exact contributing compound is limited. Furthermore, the impact of grain type, bread processing and the resulting compositional changes in bread on gastrointestinal tolerability in NCWS is unclear, especially as consumed part of a typical daily human diet. The objective of this study is to investigate the effects of well-characterised breads on (extra-)intestinal symptoms in individuals with NWGS using two double-blind randomized cross-over design (study A and B). Subjects are required to avoid any products that cause GI symptoms (e.g. wheat products) during the trial. The investigators hypothesize that grain type and processing will have a different effect on the primary outcomes. In addition, we want to explore the in vitro effect of each bread type on gut microbiota composition and activity.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTDifferent types of bread

Two studies comprising a double-blind randomized cross-over study. All subjects start with a run-in period of 3 days, thereafter they will receive three different types of bread in a randomized order for 1 day each, with a wash-out period of at least 7 days in between. Before test days 2 and 3, there is also a run-in period of three days.

Sponsors

Wageningen University
CollaboratorOTHER
Maastricht University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Intervention model description

Double-blind randomized cross-over study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Develops of self-reported GI symptoms within 12 hours after a single intake of bread; * Age between 18-70 years; * Asymptomatic or only mildly symptomatic (overall) GI symptoms score with VAS \< 30mm) while on the gluten-free/gluten-restricted diet; * Must have a freezer (-18ºC) to store the study breads during the study; * Willing and able to give written informed consent and to understand, participate and comply with the research project requirements.

Exclusion criteria

* Medical history of coeliac disease, wheat allergy, inflammatory bowel disease, presence of an organic gastrointestinal (GI) disease (such as inflammatory bowel disease) or other disease which may interfere with NCWS symptoms (upon judgment of the physician-clinical investigator (Dr. Keszthelyi, Gastroenterologist MUMC+)); * Previous major abdominal surgery or radiotherapy interfering with gastrointestinal function: * Uncomplicated appendectomy, cholecystectomy and hysterectomy allowed unless within the past 6 months; * Other surgery may be allowed based upon judgment of the physician-clinical investigator (Dr. Keszthelyi, Gastroenterologist MUMC+), who will decide on inor exclusion based upon the surgery applied; * Use of medication potentially influencing gastrointestinal function and/or NCWS symptoms is allowed, provided that dosing has been stable for ≥ 1 month before enrolment; * Administration of probiotic, prebiotic supplements, investigational drugs or participation in any scientific intervention study, which may interfere with this study (to be decided by the principle investigator), in the 14 days prior to the study; * Excessive use of alcohol (\>15 alcoholic units per week), or other drugs; * Plan to lose weight or follow a specific weight loss diet within the study period; * Current malignancy; * Pregnancy or breastfeeding; * Participation in any scientific intervention study, which may interfere with this study; * Insufficient fluency of the Dutch language. Follow-up measurement - inclusion criteria * (1) NCWS subject: develops GI symptoms within 12 hours after consumption of at least one of the study breads of study A or B (+15 mm on VAS); OR (2) Healthy control (sex matched to NCWS subjects): eats bread regularly (min. 5 days per week) * Age between 18-70 years; * Must have a fridge (4-7ºC) to shortly store the collected faecal sample. Follow-up measurement -

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall GI symptom scoreAt the end of day 1, 2 and 3 of the run-in period, at the end of test day 1, 2 and 3, and at the end of the last three days of each wash-out period (so the three days prior to testday 2 and 3).Change from baseline, measured on the Visual Analogue Scale ranged from 0 - 100, in which 0 is absence of symptoms and 100 is severe symptoms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Individual Intestinal symptom scoresAt the end of day 1, 2 and 3 of the run-in period, at the end of test day 1, 2 and 3, and at the end of the last three days of each wash-out period (so the three days prior to testday 2 and 3).Change from baseline, measured on the Visual Analogue Scale ranged from 0 - 100, in which 0 is absence of symptoms and 100 is severe symptoms. Parameters: abdominal pain, abdominal discomfort, belching, bloating, flatulence, diarrhoea, constipation, urge to empty bowel, fullness, nausea.
Individual Extra-intestinal symptom scoresAt the end of day 1, 2 and 3 of the run-in period, at the end of test day 1, 2 and 3, and at the end of the last three days of each wash-out period (so the three days prior to testday 2 and 3).Change from baseline, measured on the Visual Analogue Scale ranged from 0 - 100, in which 0 is absence of symptoms and 100 is severe symptoms. Parameters: tiredness, headache, joint pains, confusion, loss of coordination, skin rash.
Average stool frequency and consistencyAfter every stool production during day 1, 2 and 3 of the run-in period, during test day 1, 2 and 3, and during the last three days of each wash-out period (so the three days prior to testday 2 and 3).Bristol Stool Scale, a validated scale for faecal frequency and consistency, by classifying faeces into seven groups. Type 1: separate hard lumps, like nuts (hard to pass); Type 2: sausage-shaped but lumpy; Type 3: Like a sausage but with cracks on its surface; Type 4: Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft; Type 5: Soft blobs with clear-cut edges (passed easily); Type 6: fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool; Type 7: watery, no solid pieces / entirely liquid. Type 1-2 indicate constipation, type 3-4 are ideal stools as they are easier to pass, and type 5-7 may indicate diarrhoea and urgency.
Follow-up: microbiota compositionFollow-up measurement, within 1 year after completion of test day 3.After completion of the primary study, 5 responders (see in- and exclusion criteria) will be included for a follow-up measurement. For comparison, 5 healthy controls will be included. The participants will collect one fecal sample at home. These samples will be used to study the effect of the six different bread types on microbiota composition in an in vitro fermentation model.
Follow-up: microbiota activityFollow-up measurement, within 1 year after completion of test day 3.After completion of the primary study, 5 responders (see in- and exclusion criteria) will be included for a follow-up measurement. For comparison, 5 healthy controls will be included. The participants will collect one fecal sample at home. These samples will be used to study the effect of the six different bread types on microbiota activity, measured by the release of microbial VOCs, in an in vitro fermentation model.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Food intake by three-day food recordsFor 24 hours during day 1, 2 and 3 of the run-in period, during test day 1, 2 and 3, and during the last three days of each wash-out period (so the three days prior to test day 2 and 3).A three-day food record (on paper) to check for the adherence to the gluten-free diet.
Participant characteristics in relation to NCWSData on medical history and demographic factors will be collected during the screening visit as part of the screening process. Data on psychological factors will be collected after inclusion of subjects, before the start of the run-in period.To characterise NCWS subjects, data will be collected on medical history (e.g. surgery, GI diseases, medication use, allergies), demographic (e.g. age, gender, educational background, BMI, smoking, alcohol use) and psychosocial factors (relating to e.g. anxiety, depression, somatisation) using screening questionnaires.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026