Skip to content

Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Alternative Radiation Oncology Strategies

Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Alternative Radiation Oncology Strategies

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04083937
Acronym
PAROS
Enrollment
897
Registered
2019-09-10
Start date
2018-09-12
Completion date
2029-01-01
Last updated
2026-03-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Brief summary

As the most common male carcinoma, prostate cancer is a major tumor entity in oncology. In addition to definitive radiotherapy, surgical procedure is considered to be an oncologically equivalent therapeutic alternative for non-metastatic malignancies in the primary setting. However, a subsequent radiotherapy of the prostate bed is often necessary, which takes place as an "adjuvant" treatment immediately after surgery or in the course of a repeated increase in PSA and usually extends over several weeks. For the primary situation (without previous surgery), several randomized phase III clinical trials have shown that it is possible to shorten radiotherapy by increasing the single dose (called hypofractionation). In the context of two prospective Phase II studies, which were carried out in Heidelberg, it has since been shown that hypofractionation with both photons and protons is safe and feasible even in the postoperative situation. The current, prospective and randomized PAROS study is now intended to demonstrate a multicentric phase III study as an improvement in the quality of life caused by rectum toxicity (primary endpoint) by the use of protons. The oncological non-inferiority of hypofractionated radiotherapy after surgery is a secondary endpoint.

Interventions

RADIATIONHypofractionated radiotherapy with photons

hypofractionated radiotherapy with photons (total dose 57.0 Gray in 19 fractions)

RADIATIONHypofractionated radiotherapy with protons

hypofractionated radiotherapy with protons (total dose 57.0 Gray relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in 19 fractions)

RADIATIONNormofractionated radiotherapy with photons

normofractionated radiotherapy with photons (total dose 70.0 Gray in 35 fractions)

Sponsors

University Hospital Heidelberg
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* histology-proven prostate cancer with Gleason Score and PSA-value; * indication for prostate bed irradiation (adjuvant/ salvage) after prostatectomy; * Karnofsky-Index ≥ 70% * age ≥ 18 years

Exclusion criteria

* androgen deprivation therapy * lymphatic spread * macroscopic tumor/ R2 * stage IV (M1) * previous irradiation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of life (prostate-associated, 12 weeks vs baseline)12 weeksThe primary objective of the present trial is to show a Change in the bowel symptoms according to scores on the EORTC QLQ-PR25 questionaire after proton therapy compared to photon irradiation (week 12 vs. baseline).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS)5 years after baselinenon-inferiority of hypofractionated radiotherapy compared to normofractionated radiotherapy with regard to biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS)
overall survival (OS)5 years after baselinenon-inferiority of hypofractionated radiotherapy compared to normofractionated radiotherapy with regard to overall survival (OS)
Toxicity acc. to NCI CTCAE V 5.0 after 2 and 5 years2 and 5 years after baselinenon-inferiority of hypofractionated radiotherapy compared to normofractionated radiotherapy with regard to toxicity
Quality of life (general and prostate-associated, 2 years and 5 years vs. baseline)2 and 5 years after baselinenon-inferiority of hypofractionated radiotherapy compared to normofractionated radiotherapy with regard to changes in the scores of quality of life based on the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionaire

Countries

Germany

Contacts

CONTACTJuergen Debus
juergen.debus@med.uni-heidelberg.de06221 56 8201
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJuergen Debus

University Hospital Heidelberg

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026