Skip to content

Exploration of Blood Flow Regulation to Bone in Humans

Exploration of Blood Flow Regulation to Bone in Humans

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04083794
Enrollment
90
Registered
2019-09-10
Start date
2018-05-31
Completion date
2023-04-13
Last updated
2024-06-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bone Blood Flow Regulation

Keywords

bone perfusion, bone blood flow regulation, vascular sympathetic activity, skeletal loading, spinal cord injury

Brief summary

Without blood flow, bone cannot maintain its integrity. Bone blood flow responds to various local and systemic factors, however, bone perfusion in humans remains relatively unstudied. The investigators will study key mechanisms that regulate bone perfusion in able-bodied and contrast responses to those with spinal cord injury (SCI). SCI is a model of chronic reduced loading with loss of sympathetic regulation. In tibial cortical bone, the investigators will: 1) determine the impact of compressive loading with and without muscle contractions; 2) determine the impact of vascular sympathetic activity and systemic perfusion pressure; 3) compare the response between able-bodied and those with SCI. Acute metabolic needs of bone due to loading increase flow substantially. In addition, the bone vasculature is innervated by a rich network of sympathetic nerves that serve a functional purpose in the control of blood flow. A critical limitation to the study of bone blood flow in humans has been the lack of non-invasive assessments. Previously, the investigators developed a near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) device to non-invasively assess blood content in bone and assessed tibial perfusion in response to exercise. Here, the investigators will test the hypothesis that bone blood flow increases proportional to loading conditions in both able-bodied individuals and those with SCI. The investigators will also test the hypothesis that there are decreases in blood bone flow that are proportional to increases in leg vascular sympathetic outflow in the able-bodied, but that changes in bone blood flow are proportional to changes in blood pressure in those with SCI. The proposed research will be some of the first to determine the control of bone flow in humans.

Detailed description

All tissues of the human body require adequate perfusion to provide oxygen and nutrients to meet metabolic demands. It has long been known that the arterial system in bone is of overwhelming importance and that without blood flow, bone cannot maintain its integrity. Indeed, there is an extensive network of arteries, arterioles, and capillaries that supply human bone. Moreover, blood flow to bone is responsive to various local and systemic factors that can determine the overall health of bone. However, bone perfusion in humans remains relatively unstudied and so the underlying mechanisms that regulate bone blood flow are not well understood. The investigators propose to study key mechanisms that regulate bone perfusion in able-bodied individuals and to contrast them with spinal cord injured (SCI) individuals. SCI represents a human 'model' of chronic reduced loading with loss of sympathetic regulation below the level of injury that likely alters control of bone perfusion. Accordingly, our aims are to: 1) Determine the impact of compressive loading with and without associated muscle contractions on tibial perfusion; 2) Determine the impact of vascular sympathetic activity and systemic perfusion pressure on tibial perfusion; 3) Compare the changes in tibial perfusion in response to local and systemic factors between able-bodied and those with SCI. The majority of work in bone blood flow has been in animals and/or has focused on the association between adequate or inadequate perfusion and bone health. For example, inadequate flow has been associated with bone loss, impaired growth, and delayed fracture healing. However, the acute metabolic needs of bone due to loading either with or without associated muscle contractions increase flow substantially. Indeed, within two minutes of isolated muscle contractions alone, tibial perfusion has been shown to increase significantly. Furthermore, when there is compressive loading with associated muscle contractions, flow to bone can double. Similarly, skeletal unloading for as short as ten minutes cuts femoral perfusion by half. Although it is unclear what specific local factors (e.g., metabolic by-products) with loading might be responsible for regulation of blood flow, these data strongly suggest that perfusion to bone is highly responsive to skeletal loading. Indeed, it appears that similar regulatory mechanisms may be at play in control of flow to bone and skeletal muscle during exercise. In addition, the bone vasculature is richly innervated by sympathetic nerves. Application of norepinephrine decreases blood flow to both intact bone and isolated bone. Likewise, sympathetic stimulation decreases flow to bone via alpha-adrenergic receptor activation. Moreover, smooth muscle of arterioles in bone respond as expected to vasodilators and vasoconstrictors. Hence, sympathetic innervation of the bone vasculature serves a functional purpose in control of flow. If this were not the case, independent of the link between bone metabolism and bone flow, the arterial network in bone would act as a simple pressure passive system. A critical limitation to the study of bone flow in humans has been the lack of noninvasive assessments. Thus, it has been difficult to elucidate the mechanisms that control perfusion to bone. The dense nature of bone makes it difficult to investigate perfusion and the techniques used to quantify circulation in other tissues are either difficult or impossible to apply to bone in vivo. the investigators recently demonstrated the efficacy of a near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) system to non-invasively detect changes in hemoglobin content in the tibia. Although our preliminary work showed the utility of NIRS, it was not designed to provide insight to blood flow regulation and disentangle the various possible contributors to bone perfusion. Here the investigators propose to study different mechanisms that control blood flow to bone in both able-bodied and spinal cord injured (SCI). The SCI population will offer valuable insights to the mechanisms of perfusion as several contributors (i.e. loading and vascular sympathetic control) are either reduced or disrupted. Study completion update: Given the exploratory nature of this study, the scope has been adjusted to address the challenges and limitations that have occurred during the duration of this research. Nonetheless the work completed has provided unprecedented findings on key mechanisms of vascular regulation in bone in vivo in humans. We were not able to assess the impact of compressive loading with or without associated muscle contractions on tibial perfusion due to marked impact of motion artefacts on the near infrared spectroscopy technology used to assess tibial perfusion. In young healthy adults, we have assessed the impact of vascular sympathetic activity (in response to two stimuli: isometric handgrip exercise and cold pressor test) and increased perfusion pressure (in response to two stimuli: leg dependency and reactive hyperemia). In those with spinal cord injury, given the inherent limitations of working with this population (i.e., increased spasticity, autonomic dysreflexia), we have assessed the impact of lack of vascular sympathetic activity on tibial blood flow regulation. Furthermore, we have extended the initial work and in young healthy adults we have investigated an additional key regulation mechanism of the tibial vasculature, namely nitric oxide mediated vasodilation. Even though we have obtained data during compressive loading in both able-bodied and adults with spinal cord injury, the data were not usable due to motion artefacts. In addition, the data obtained in those with SCI during leg dependency and reactive hyperemia were insufficient or unusable (due to increased spasticity and autonomic dysreflexia) to draw any meaningful conclusions.

Interventions

OTHERLaboratory based assessments

physical maneuvers to assess physiological responses in bone blood flow

Sponsors

National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
CollaboratorNIH
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This is a Basic Experimental study with Humans with able-bodied individuals and individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). This study is a cross sectional assessment and will have 1 or 2 visits consisting of 2 protocols where individuals will undergo several physical maneuvers during which bone perfusion response will be assessed. Protocol #1 will investigate tibial perfusion response to tibial loading. Protocol #2 will investigate tibial perfusion response to isometric handgrip exercise and tilt. Volunteers can choose to do one or both protocols during 1 or 2 laboratory visits. Study completion update: In able bodied adults, we have investigated tibial perfusion in response to isometric handgrip exercise, cold pressor test, leg dependency, reactive hyperemia, and sublingual nitroglycerin. In adults with spinal cord injury, we have investigated tibial perfusion in response to isometric handgrip exercise.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* healthy males and females * individuals with spinal cord injuries, between 3 and 24 months post injury, with complete injuries according to the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale A and B, with injuries at T6 and below

Exclusion criteria

* clinical signs or symptoms of heart disease * hypertension * coronary disease * diabetes * other neurological disease * cancer * recent weight change \>15 pounds * abnormal resting ECG * pregnant and/or breastfeeding women * underweight and obese individuals (body mass index between 18.5 and 29.9) * use of amphetamines (Ritalin, Adderall, Concerta) in the past 48 hours * tibial fracture or tibial stress fracture in the past year * those with SCI will have no extreme spasticity to avoid spontaneous contractions * use of baclofen for those with SCI

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tibial Blood Perfusion1 dayConcentration of hemoglobin content assessed in response to several physical maneuvers (isometric handgrip exercise, cold pressor test, nitroglycerin, reactive hyperemia, leg dependency). Results are reported in tibial total hemoglobin content (μM). To date there are no absolute established values of tibial bone hemoglobin content and thus an absolute range (minimum and maximum) cannot be provided.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

The current study does not assign participants to arms; it is a cross-sectional assessment where all participants will undergo the same procedures. Upon enrollment, all participants underwent laboratory based assessments.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Laboratory Based Assessments
The current study has no arms; it is a cross-sectional assessment where all participants will undergo the same procedures. Laboratory based assessments: this is a cross-sectional study including physical maneuvers to assess physiological responses in bone blood flow in young healthy adults and adults with spinal cord injury.
81
Total81

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up9

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLaboratory Based Assessments
Age, Categorical
Spinal cord injury individuals
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Spinal cord injury individuals
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Spinal cord injury individuals
Between 18 and 65 years
14 Participants
Age, Categorical
Uninjured controls
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Uninjured controls
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Uninjured controls
Between 18 and 65 years
67 Participants
Body Mass Index
Spinal cord injury individuals
23.6 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
Body Mass Index
Uninjured controls
23.1 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Spinal cord injured individuals
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Spinal cord injured individuals
Not Hispanic or Latino
11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Spinal cord injured individuals
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Uninjured controls
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Uninjured controls
Not Hispanic or Latino
60 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Uninjured controls
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
Population
Spinal cord injury individuals
14 Participants
Population
Uninjured controls
67 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Spinal cord injured individuals
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Spinal cord injured individuals
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Spinal cord injured individuals
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Spinal cord injured individuals
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Spinal cord injured individuals
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Spinal cord injured individuals
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Spinal cord injured individuals
White
11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Uninjured controls
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Uninjured controls
Asian
7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Uninjured controls
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Uninjured controls
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Uninjured controls
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Uninjured controls
Unknown or Not Reported
7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Uninjured controls
White
50 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
Spinal cord injury individuals
14 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
Uninjured controls
67 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Spinal cord injury individuals
Female
1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Spinal cord injury individuals
Male
13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Uninjured controls
Female
30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Uninjured controls
Male
37 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 81
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 81
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 81

Outcome results

Primary

Tibial Blood Perfusion

Concentration of hemoglobin content assessed in response to several physical maneuvers (isometric handgrip exercise, cold pressor test, nitroglycerin, reactive hyperemia, leg dependency). Results are reported in tibial total hemoglobin content (μM). To date there are no absolute established values of tibial bone hemoglobin content and thus an absolute range (minimum and maximum) cannot be provided.

Time frame: 1 day

Population: 81 participants include 67 controls and 14 SCI across 2 protocols. Thus, most individuals completed only a subset of the total physiological maneuvers.~After quality control, unusable data was discarded and outcome measures are reported only in the subgroup of individuals (# of participants analyzed for each group included for each test below) analyzed with appropriate data. Reasons for unusable data: spasticity (SCI), unable to complete certain physiological stimuli, motion artifacts.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Laboratory Based AssessmentsTibial Blood PerfusionSpinal Cord Injury: Isometric handgrip exercise - maximum tibial total hemoglobin (N=14 analyzed)0.54 μM (concentration)Standard Deviation 1.66
Laboratory Based AssessmentsTibial Blood PerfusionUninjured controls: Isometric handgrip exercise - maximum tibial total hemoglobin (N=13 analyzed)-1.47 μM (concentration)Standard Deviation 3.86
Laboratory Based AssessmentsTibial Blood PerfusionUninjured controls: Cold pressor test - maximum tibial total hemoglobin (N=13 analyzed)0.43 μM (concentration)Standard Deviation 2.18
Laboratory Based AssessmentsTibial Blood PerfusionUninjured controls: Nitroglycerin response - maximum tibial total hemoglobin(N=16 analyzed)2.08 μM (concentration)Standard Deviation 0.88
Laboratory Based AssessmentsTibial Blood PerfusionUninjured controls: Reactive hyperemia - maximum tibial total hemoglobin (N=11 analyzed)3.42 μM (concentration)Standard Deviation 2.06
Laboratory Based AssessmentsTibial Blood PerfusionUninjured controls: Leg dependency - tibial total hemoglobin (N=14 analyzed)1.55 μM (concentration)Standard Deviation 8.55

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026