Psychiatric Disorder
Conditions
Keywords
Complex mental health, employment, Enhanced Individual Placement & Support, Model of Human Occupation, Worker Role Interview
Brief summary
The purpose of this cohort study, using an existing database, is to seek to describe the relationship between psychosocial factors (independent variables) and employment outcomes (dependent variables) in a population of people with complex mental health problems receiving evidence-based supported employment (EBSE) augmented with theory-driven occupational therapy interventions. The intention is to understand the predictive nature of psychosocial factors on the positive outcome of success in achieving paid employment. The Worker role interview (WRI) is routinely used in the research site; an National health Service (NHS) occupational therapy led vocational rehabilitation delivering EBSE service for people with complex mental health problems. An existing database of initial assessments and employment outcomes is available for investigation.
Detailed description
The cohort study will be undertaken utilising a secondary dataset from an established vocational rehabilitation service (VRS). This service is experienced in providing intervention based on individual placement and support (IPS) with established high fidelity to the model. The team's interventions are also guided by the model of human occupation, (MOHO) and the Worker Role Interview is routinely completed with all patients accessing the service. The Worker Role Interview is a valid reliable measure of psychosocial items measuring of readiness for employment. The consistency of intervention will be ensured as the service is routinely appraised for fidelity to the IPS by two experts, using a standardised assessment tool the IPS fidelity scale and the team has received ongoing training and regular caseload supervision to integrate evidence-based occupational therapy into practice. The experts appraising the service are independent of both the clinical service and the proposed research. The established VRS provides an assessment and intervention for people with complex mental health problems. A dataset has been routinely collected over several years which is currently used to evaluate the service. To address potential limitations of secondary data analysis the researcher has an established relationship with clinicians in the VRS and was involved in the selection of routine measures now used to evaluate the service. It is, therefore, possible to be confident that a consistent and standard dataset is available for analysis. Ongoing training and consultation have been provided by the researcher to the clinical service to ensure the data quality. Data Collection The data will be managed and transferred by a trained researcher on site at both services.Data will be robustly anonymised prior to transfer. Data will be transferred from NHS secure network to secure network within Queen Margaret University using a secure email service approved by the Department of Health. The dataset comprises; Research identification (ID) code Gender Age on Admission Ethnicity Marital Status Living situation (alone/shared/supported accommodation) Quintile range of Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation Educational attainment Previous employment ICD10 Worker role interview items Date of assessment WRI Assesses Abilities & Limitations WRI Expectation of Success in Work WRI Takes Responsibility WRI Commitment to Work WRI Work-Related Goals WRI Enjoys Work WRI Pursues Interests WRI Appraises Work Expectations WRI Influence of Other Roles WRI Work Habits WRI Daily Routines WRI Adapts Routine to Minimize Difficulties WRI Perception of Physical Work Setting WRI Perception of Family and Peers WRI Perception of Boss and/or Company WRI Perception of Co-workers Employment goal Date of final goal review Outcome of goal (successful/ unsuccessful in attaining employment) Sample; Based on the guideline of a minimum of 10 events per predictor variable, a sample size of 200 would allow for the robust estimation of 8 variables in the model. Analysis Plan The collected data will be subject to analysis with the use of multiple logistic regression using the R data analysis software. Multiple logistic regression will allow the construction of models which examine the effects of psychosocial predictors on the probability of a person with complex mental health problems attaining paid employment. Possible confounds which may influence outcomes will be controlled for (e.g. age, gender, educational achievement, history of employment). Interpretation of the analysis will be shared and discussed with clinicians who are expert in their field to ensure that findings are considered from both a statistical significance and clinical significance position.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* self-referred to vocational rehabilitation service * goal of open paid employment or education * supported by community mental health teams * capacity to consent
Exclusion criteria
* Lack capacity for informed consent. * Refusal or withdrawal of informed consent * Incomplete initial assessment data * Withdrawal from participation in service prior to intervention
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Attainment of Employment or Education | 1day | successful attainment of open employment or educational opportunity / unsuccessful |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Attainment of Employment or Education | 1day-69months | Time to outcome for those successfully attaining employment or education |
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Enhanced IPS Programme An enhanced individual placement and support (IPS) intervention based on the Model of Human Occupation | 202 |
| Total | 202 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Enhanced IPS Programme |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 37.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8 |
| Educational Attainment Did Not Attain School Quals | 18 Participants |
| Educational Attainment Exams from School | 61 Participants |
| Educational Attainment Further Education | 121 Participants |
| Educational Attainment missing data | 2 Participants |
| ICD10 ICD10 F2 | 105 Participants |
| ICD10 ICD10 F3 | 67 Participants |
| ICD10 ICD10 other | 30 Participants |
| Marital Status Married / de facto relationship | 33 Participants |
| Marital Status missing data | 6 Participants |
| Marital Status Single | 163 Participants |
| Previous Employment No previous employment | 20 Participants |
| Previous Employment Previous employment | 182 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Ethnicity Other ethnic group | 17 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Ethnicity White | 185 Participants |
| Scottish Indices of Multiple Deprivation least deprived quintile 5 | 64 Participants |
| Scottish Indices of Multiple Deprivation most deprived quintile 1 | 38 Participants |
| Scottish Indices of Multiple Deprivation quintile 2 | 35 Participants |
| Scottish Indices of Multiple Deprivation quintile 3 | 33 Participants |
| Scottish Indices of Multiple Deprivation quintile 4 | 32 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 78 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 124 Participants |
| Social Situation living alone | 101 Participants |
| Social Situation living with others | 97 Participants |
| Social Situation missing data | 4 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Adapts routines to minimize difficulties Interferes | 85 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Adapts routines to minimize difficulties Missing data | 1 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Adapts routines to minimize difficulties Strongly interferes | 16 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Adapts routines to minimize difficulties Strongly supports | 13 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Adapts routines to minimize difficulties Supports | 87 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Appraises work expectations Interferes | 34 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Appraises work expectations Missing data | 4 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Appraises work expectations Strongly interferes | 6 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Appraises work expectations Strongly supports | 50 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Appraises work expectations Supports | 108 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Assesses Abilities and Limitations Interferes | 59 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Assesses Abilities and Limitations Missing data | 1 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Assesses Abilities and Limitations Strongly interferes | 5 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Assesses Abilities and Limitations Strongly supports | 35 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Assesses Abilities and Limitations Supports | 102 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Commitment to work Interferes | 27 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Commitment to work Missing data | 0 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Commitment to work Strongly interferes | 0 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Commitment to work Strongly supports | 69 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Commitment to work Supports | 106 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Daily Routine Interferes | 106 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Daily Routine Missing data | 1 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Daily Routine Strongly interferes | 20 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Daily Routine Strongly supports | 13 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Daily Routine Supports | 62 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Enjoys work Interferes | 42 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Enjoys work Missing data | 5 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Enjoys work Strongly interferes | 5 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Enjoys work Strongly supports | 36 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Enjoys work Supports | 114 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Expectation of job success Interferes | 88 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Expectation of job success Missing data | 0 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Expectation of job success Strongly interferes | 5 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Expectation of job success Strongly supports | 17 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Expectation of job success Supports | 92 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Influence of other roles Interferes | 54 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Influence of other roles Missing data | 0 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Influence of other roles Strongly interferes | 2 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Influence of other roles Strongly supports | 50 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Influence of other roles Supports | 96 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Perception of boss and/or company Interferes | 57 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Perception of boss and/or company Missing data | 58 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Perception of boss and/or company Strongly interferes | 9 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Perception of boss and/or company Strongly supports | 26 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Perception of boss and/or company Supports | 52 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Perception of co-workers Interferes | 40 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Perception of co-workers Missing data | 65 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Perception of co-workers Strongly interferes | 8 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Perception of co-workers Strongly supports | 26 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Perception of co-workers Supports | 63 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Perception of family and peers Interferes | 33 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Perception of family and peers Missing data | 16 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Perception of family and peers Strongly interferes | 11 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Perception of family and peers Strongly supports | 50 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Perception of family and peers Supports | 92 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Perception of physical work setting Interferes | 46 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Perception of physical work setting Missing data | 20 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Perception of physical work setting Strongly interferes | 2 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Perception of physical work setting Strongly supports | 27 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Perception of physical work setting Supports | 107 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Pursues interests Interferes | 81 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Pursues interests Missing data | 2 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Pursues interests Strongly interferes | 10 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Pursues interests Strongly supports | 32 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Pursues interests Supports | 77 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Takes Responsibility Interferes | 82 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Takes Responsibility Missing data | 0 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Takes Responsibility Strongly interferes | 9 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Takes Responsibility Strongly supports | 30 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Takes Responsibility Supports | 81 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Work Habits Interferes | 52 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Work Habits Missing data | 5 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Work Habits Strongly interferes | 16 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Work Habits Strongly supports | 33 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Work Habits Supports | 96 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Work-related goals Interferes | 74 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Work-related goals Missing data | 1 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Work-related goals Strongly interferes | 9 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Work-related goals Strongly supports | 29 Participants |
| Worker Role Interview Item Work-related goals Supports | 89 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 202 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 202 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 202 |
Outcome results
Attainment of Employment or Education
successful attainment of open employment or educational opportunity / unsuccessful
Time frame: 1day
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enhanced IPS Programme | Attainment of Employment or Education | Did not attain employment or education | 74 Participants |
| Enhanced IPS Programme | Attainment of Employment or Education | Attained employment or education | 128 Participants |
Time to Attainment of Employment or Education
Time to outcome for those successfully attaining employment or education
Time frame: 1day-69months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Enhanced IPS Programme | Time to Attainment of Employment or Education | 8.435 months |