Skip to content

Investigating Psychosocial Predictors & Employment Outcomes of Enhanced IPS Intervention

Investigating Psychosocial Predictors & Employment Outcomes of Enhanced IPS Intervention A Prospective Cohort Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04083404
Enrollment
202
Registered
2019-09-10
Start date
2015-01-01
Completion date
2018-09-05
Last updated
2020-01-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Psychiatric Disorder

Keywords

Complex mental health, employment, Enhanced Individual Placement & Support, Model of Human Occupation, Worker Role Interview

Brief summary

The purpose of this cohort study, using an existing database, is to seek to describe the relationship between psychosocial factors (independent variables) and employment outcomes (dependent variables) in a population of people with complex mental health problems receiving evidence-based supported employment (EBSE) augmented with theory-driven occupational therapy interventions. The intention is to understand the predictive nature of psychosocial factors on the positive outcome of success in achieving paid employment. The Worker role interview (WRI) is routinely used in the research site; an National health Service (NHS) occupational therapy led vocational rehabilitation delivering EBSE service for people with complex mental health problems. An existing database of initial assessments and employment outcomes is available for investigation.

Detailed description

The cohort study will be undertaken utilising a secondary dataset from an established vocational rehabilitation service (VRS). This service is experienced in providing intervention based on individual placement and support (IPS) with established high fidelity to the model. The team's interventions are also guided by the model of human occupation, (MOHO) and the Worker Role Interview is routinely completed with all patients accessing the service. The Worker Role Interview is a valid reliable measure of psychosocial items measuring of readiness for employment. The consistency of intervention will be ensured as the service is routinely appraised for fidelity to the IPS by two experts, using a standardised assessment tool the IPS fidelity scale and the team has received ongoing training and regular caseload supervision to integrate evidence-based occupational therapy into practice. The experts appraising the service are independent of both the clinical service and the proposed research. The established VRS provides an assessment and intervention for people with complex mental health problems. A dataset has been routinely collected over several years which is currently used to evaluate the service. To address potential limitations of secondary data analysis the researcher has an established relationship with clinicians in the VRS and was involved in the selection of routine measures now used to evaluate the service. It is, therefore, possible to be confident that a consistent and standard dataset is available for analysis. Ongoing training and consultation have been provided by the researcher to the clinical service to ensure the data quality. Data Collection The data will be managed and transferred by a trained researcher on site at both services.Data will be robustly anonymised prior to transfer. Data will be transferred from NHS secure network to secure network within Queen Margaret University using a secure email service approved by the Department of Health. The dataset comprises; Research identification (ID) code Gender Age on Admission Ethnicity Marital Status Living situation (alone/shared/supported accommodation) Quintile range of Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation Educational attainment Previous employment ICD10 Worker role interview items Date of assessment WRI Assesses Abilities & Limitations WRI Expectation of Success in Work WRI Takes Responsibility WRI Commitment to Work WRI Work-Related Goals WRI Enjoys Work WRI Pursues Interests WRI Appraises Work Expectations WRI Influence of Other Roles WRI Work Habits WRI Daily Routines WRI Adapts Routine to Minimize Difficulties WRI Perception of Physical Work Setting WRI Perception of Family and Peers WRI Perception of Boss and/or Company WRI Perception of Co-workers Employment goal Date of final goal review Outcome of goal (successful/ unsuccessful in attaining employment) Sample; Based on the guideline of a minimum of 10 events per predictor variable, a sample size of 200 would allow for the robust estimation of 8 variables in the model. Analysis Plan The collected data will be subject to analysis with the use of multiple logistic regression using the R data analysis software. Multiple logistic regression will allow the construction of models which examine the effects of psychosocial predictors on the probability of a person with complex mental health problems attaining paid employment. Possible confounds which may influence outcomes will be controlled for (e.g. age, gender, educational achievement, history of employment). Interpretation of the analysis will be shared and discussed with clinicians who are expert in their field to ensure that findings are considered from both a statistical significance and clinical significance position.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

NHS Lothian
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Queen Margaret University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* self-referred to vocational rehabilitation service * goal of open paid employment or education * supported by community mental health teams * capacity to consent

Exclusion criteria

* Lack capacity for informed consent. * Refusal or withdrawal of informed consent * Incomplete initial assessment data * Withdrawal from participation in service prior to intervention

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Attainment of Employment or Education1daysuccessful attainment of open employment or educational opportunity / unsuccessful

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Attainment of Employment or Education1day-69monthsTime to outcome for those successfully attaining employment or education

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Enhanced IPS Programme
An enhanced individual placement and support (IPS) intervention based on the Model of Human Occupation
202
Total202

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEnhanced IPS Programme
Age, Continuous37.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
Educational Attainment
Did Not Attain School Quals
18 Participants
Educational Attainment
Exams from School
61 Participants
Educational Attainment
Further Education
121 Participants
Educational Attainment
missing data
2 Participants
ICD10
ICD10 F2
105 Participants
ICD10
ICD10 F3
67 Participants
ICD10
ICD10 other
30 Participants
Marital Status
Married / de facto relationship
33 Participants
Marital Status
missing data
6 Participants
Marital Status
Single
163 Participants
Previous Employment
No previous employment
20 Participants
Previous Employment
Previous employment
182 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Other ethnic group
17 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
White
185 Participants
Scottish Indices of Multiple Deprivation
least deprived quintile 5
64 Participants
Scottish Indices of Multiple Deprivation
most deprived quintile 1
38 Participants
Scottish Indices of Multiple Deprivation
quintile 2
35 Participants
Scottish Indices of Multiple Deprivation
quintile 3
33 Participants
Scottish Indices of Multiple Deprivation
quintile 4
32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
78 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
124 Participants
Social Situation
living alone
101 Participants
Social Situation
living with others
97 Participants
Social Situation
missing data
4 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Adapts routines to minimize difficulties
Interferes
85 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Adapts routines to minimize difficulties
Missing data
1 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Adapts routines to minimize difficulties
Strongly interferes
16 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Adapts routines to minimize difficulties
Strongly supports
13 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Adapts routines to minimize difficulties
Supports
87 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Appraises work expectations
Interferes
34 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Appraises work expectations
Missing data
4 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Appraises work expectations
Strongly interferes
6 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Appraises work expectations
Strongly supports
50 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Appraises work expectations
Supports
108 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Assesses Abilities and Limitations
Interferes
59 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Assesses Abilities and Limitations
Missing data
1 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Assesses Abilities and Limitations
Strongly interferes
5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Assesses Abilities and Limitations
Strongly supports
35 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Assesses Abilities and Limitations
Supports
102 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Commitment to work
Interferes
27 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Commitment to work
Missing data
0 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Commitment to work
Strongly interferes
0 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Commitment to work
Strongly supports
69 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Commitment to work
Supports
106 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Daily Routine
Interferes
106 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Daily Routine
Missing data
1 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Daily Routine
Strongly interferes
20 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Daily Routine
Strongly supports
13 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Daily Routine
Supports
62 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Enjoys work
Interferes
42 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Enjoys work
Missing data
5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Enjoys work
Strongly interferes
5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Enjoys work
Strongly supports
36 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Enjoys work
Supports
114 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Expectation of job success
Interferes
88 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Expectation of job success
Missing data
0 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Expectation of job success
Strongly interferes
5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Expectation of job success
Strongly supports
17 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Expectation of job success
Supports
92 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Influence of other roles
Interferes
54 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Influence of other roles
Missing data
0 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Influence of other roles
Strongly interferes
2 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Influence of other roles
Strongly supports
50 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Influence of other roles
Supports
96 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of boss and/or company
Interferes
57 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of boss and/or company
Missing data
58 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of boss and/or company
Strongly interferes
9 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of boss and/or company
Strongly supports
26 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of boss and/or company
Supports
52 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of co-workers
Interferes
40 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of co-workers
Missing data
65 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of co-workers
Strongly interferes
8 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of co-workers
Strongly supports
26 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of co-workers
Supports
63 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of family and peers
Interferes
33 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of family and peers
Missing data
16 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of family and peers
Strongly interferes
11 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of family and peers
Strongly supports
50 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of family and peers
Supports
92 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of physical work setting
Interferes
46 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of physical work setting
Missing data
20 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of physical work setting
Strongly interferes
2 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of physical work setting
Strongly supports
27 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of physical work setting
Supports
107 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Pursues interests
Interferes
81 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Pursues interests
Missing data
2 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Pursues interests
Strongly interferes
10 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Pursues interests
Strongly supports
32 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Pursues interests
Supports
77 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Takes Responsibility
Interferes
82 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Takes Responsibility
Missing data
0 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Takes Responsibility
Strongly interferes
9 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Takes Responsibility
Strongly supports
30 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Takes Responsibility
Supports
81 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Work Habits
Interferes
52 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Work Habits
Missing data
5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Work Habits
Strongly interferes
16 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Work Habits
Strongly supports
33 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Work Habits
Supports
96 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Work-related goals
Interferes
74 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Work-related goals
Missing data
1 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Work-related goals
Strongly interferes
9 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Work-related goals
Strongly supports
29 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Work-related goals
Supports
89 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 202
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 202
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 202

Outcome results

Primary

Attainment of Employment or Education

successful attainment of open employment or educational opportunity / unsuccessful

Time frame: 1day

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Enhanced IPS ProgrammeAttainment of Employment or EducationDid not attain employment or education74 Participants
Enhanced IPS ProgrammeAttainment of Employment or EducationAttained employment or education128 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Time to Attainment of Employment or Education

Time to outcome for those successfully attaining employment or education

Time frame: 1day-69months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Enhanced IPS ProgrammeTime to Attainment of Employment or Education8.435 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026