Skip to content

Regional Block for Postoperative Free Flap Care

Regional Block for Postoperative Free Flap Care

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04080739
Enrollment
100
Registered
2019-09-06
Start date
2020-01-13
Completion date
2022-03-01
Last updated
2023-12-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain Management

Brief summary

The purpose of this protocol is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of regional anesthesia for head and neck patients undergoing microvascular free flap reconstruction.

Detailed description

The increasing rate of opioid related overdose mortality is well documented in the literature and approached 15 per 100,000 in 2017. Because of a growing epidemic in the US, the medical community is under scrutiny to curtail opioid prescription. However, this is weighed against surgical outcomes; importantly, postoperative pain has adverse effects on function, recovery and quality of life. Regional anesthesia provides a non opioid based, pain control strategy. First, regional anesthesia decreases systemic adverse events including respiratory failure in abdominal surgery, decreases length of stay and improves rehabilitation in common orthopedic procedures such as total knee arthroplasty and shoulder arthroplasty. Second, the physiologic benefits of regional anesthesia are compelling including augmented micro and macrocirculation, maintenance of body temperature and decreased systemic stress response through chemical sympathectomy. Finally, regional anesthesia has been established as safe in the microvascular and anesthesia literature for pediatric, and adult patients.

Interventions

DRUGropivicaine 0.2%

2-8 cc/hr of 0.2% ropivicaine given as a regional block via US-guided ipsilateral sciatic nerve block for fibula free flap patients or US-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus nerve block for forearm free flap patients.

Sponsors

University of Alabama at Birmingham
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \> 18 * Able to consent for themselves * Undergoing a head and neck surgery at UAB with reconstruction using either a forearm free flap or a fibula free flap

Exclusion criteria

* Age \< 18 * Unable to consent for themselves * Non-English speakers * Non-resectable tumor * Have a known opioid tolerance, or are on a home opioid regimen for a chronic condition. (Short-term opioid use for diagnostic procedures (i.e. biopsy) or new cancer diagnosis will be allowed). * Patients with known hepatic failure, renal failure, or sulfa allergy, as determined by standard of care labs drawn within 30 days of enrollment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Opioid Utilization Measured in Oral Morphine Equivalent (OME)21 daysOpioid Utilization was measured by the number of mg of Oral Morphine Equivalent (oral pain medication) was given to patients.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Opioid Medication Use21 daysAmount of opioid medication used post-operatively

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Experimental Group
US-guided ipsilateral sciatic nerve block for fibula free flap patients utilizing ropivacaine 0.2% at 2-8 cc/hr for fibula free flap patients; US-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus nerve block for forearm free lap patients utilizing ropivacaine 0.2% at 2-8cc/hr for forearm free flap patients. ropivicaine 0.2%: 2-8 cc/hr of 0.2% ropivicaine given as a regional block via US-guided ipsilateral sciatic nerve block for fibula free flap patients or US-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus nerve block for forearm free flap patients.
48
Control Group
No regional anesthetic of any kind during the surgical procedure.
50
Total98

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExperimental GroupControl GroupTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
44 Participants47 Participants91 Participants
Age, Continuous56 years56 years56 years
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants22 Participants44 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
26 Participants28 Participants54 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 480 / 50
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 480 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 480 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Opioid Utilization Measured in Oral Morphine Equivalent (OME)

Opioid Utilization was measured by the number of mg of Oral Morphine Equivalent (oral pain medication) was given to patients.

Time frame: 21 days

Population: Subjects included

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Experimental GroupOpioid Utilization Measured in Oral Morphine Equivalent (OME)118 mg
Control GroupOpioid Utilization Measured in Oral Morphine Equivalent (OME)166 mg
Secondary

Opioid Medication Use

Amount of opioid medication used post-operatively

Time frame: 21 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupOpioid Medication Use118 morphine milliequivalentsStandard Deviation 98.6
Control GroupOpioid Medication Use166 morphine milliequivalentsStandard Deviation 130.7

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026