Skip to content

AAI in Elderly Patient With Chronic Pain

Animal-assisted Intervention in Geriatric Patients With Chronic Joint Pain and Polypharmacy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04079985
Enrollment
69
Registered
2019-09-06
Start date
2013-10-01
Completion date
2014-10-01
Last updated
2019-09-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain

Keywords

Animal-assisted therapy, Chronic Pain, Elderly, Primary Health Care

Brief summary

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, there is a progressive aging of population. Chronic osteoarticular pain is associated to a bigger consumption of medication and a deterioration of life quality in elderly people that could be improved by boosting education for health from Primary Health Care. JUSTIFICATION: The need to develop non pharmacological treatments in order to get better results in people's global care. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectivity of group intervention, based on Animal Assisted Therapy, on elderly people suffering from chronic osteoarticular pain and poli-medication; regarding decrease of chronic pain, use of analgesics and improvement of life quality. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Randomized clinical trial, two arms, controlled and open-label. Twelve group sessions of kinesiotherapy with the intervention of a therapy dog in the experimental group (EG), carried out in the Primary Health Centre.

Interventions

The sessions were held in the primary care centre, and had specific objectives agreed in advance by the research team. The sessions had the following schedule: Session 1, lower extremities in sitting position; Session 2, upper extremities in sitting position; Session 3, cervical spine in sitting position; Session 4, dorsal spine in sitting position; Session 5, lumbar spine in sitting position; Session 6, Static Standing and Upper Extremities; Session 7, Static Standing; Sessions 8, 9, 10 and 11, Dynamic Standing; and Session 12, Safety Reinforcement.

Sponsors

Fundacio d'Investigacio en Atencio Primaria Jordi Gol i Gurina
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Single-centre, two-arm randomized, controlled, open-label clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ≥65 years * diagnosis of chronic benign joint pain * polypharmacy (\>5 drugs or active ingredients, of which 2 or more had been prescribed for pain)

Exclusion criteria

* severe cognitive deterioration (GDS\> 5) * allergy to or fear of animals

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline Western Ontario and McMaster (WOMAC) Universities Osteoarthritis Index at 13 weeksThis questionnaire was administered at baseline and at week 13.pain (0-20), stiffness (0-8), functional capacity (0-68)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline EuroQoL Health Questionnaire at 13 weeksThis questionnaire was administered at baseline and at week 13.Is a generic self-administered instrument for measuring quality of life related to health
Change from baseline Health Assessment Questionnaire at 13 weeksThis questionnaire was administered at baseline and at week 13.Is a self-administered questionnaire that assesses one's ability to perform day-to-day activities, as well as functional capacity
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 1This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 1 and through session 1 completion, an average of 1 hourIs a subjective assessment of pain. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'. The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints. The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 2This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 2 and through session 2 completion, an average of 1 hourIs a subjective assessment of pain. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'. The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints. The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 3This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 3 and through session 3 completion, an average of 1 hourIs a subjective assessment of pain. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'. The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints. The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 4This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 4 and through session 4 completion, an average of 1 hourIs a subjective assessment of pain. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'. The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints. The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 5This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 5 and through session 5 completion, an average of 1 hourIs a subjective assessment of pain. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'. The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints. The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
Change from baseline Lattinen test at 13 weeksThis questionnaire was administered at baseline and at week 13.Assesses pain and any incapacity caused by pain, as well as its frequency and intensity, the amount of painkillers taken, and whether sleep is disturbed
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 7This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 7 and through session 7 completion, an average of 1 hourIs a subjective assessment of pain. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'. The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints. The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 8This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 8 and through session 8 completion, an average of 1 hourIs a subjective assessment of pain. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'. The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints. The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 9This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 9 and through session 9 completion, an average of 1 hourIs a subjective assessment of pain. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'. The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints. The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 10This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 10 and through session 10 completion, an average of 1 hourIs a subjective assessment of pain. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'. The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints. The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 11This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 11 and through session 11 completion, an average of 1 hourIs a subjective assessment of pain. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'. The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints. The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 12This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 12 and through session 12 completion, an average of 1 hourIs a subjective assessment of pain. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'. The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints. The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
Change from baseline Visual Analog Scale at session 6This questionnaire was administered at the baseline of session 6 and through session 6 completion, an average of 1 hourIs a subjective assessment of pain. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'. The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints. The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026