Skip to content

Closed vs. Open Face Masks for Cranial Radiotherapy

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Closed vs. Open Face Masks for Cranial Radiotherapy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04079595
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-09-06
Start date
2019-12-09
Completion date
2022-05-31
Last updated
2024-05-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Brain Metastases, Brain Tumor, Meningioma, Small Cell Lung Cancer

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate whether open-face masks improve patient comfort/preference whilst maintaining immobilization performance as known for closed masks in patients undergoing whole or partial cranial radiotherapy.

Detailed description

Upon randomization, patients will be begin treatment either with an open-face mask (A) or closed mask (B). Two individual immobilization masks - the open-face and closed masks - will be fabricated for every single patient. During the 1st half of treatment the randomly assigned mask will be used followed by using another mask for the 2nd half of treatment. Discomfort/pain/anxiety and mask preference will be scored during treatment with a questionnaire.

Interventions

DEVICEHead immobilization mask

Immobilization

Sponsors

University of Zurich
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Written informed consent according to Swiss law and International Council for Harmonization (ICH)/Good Clinical Practice (GCP) regulations before any trial specific procedures; * Indication for cranial radiotherapy irrespective of tumor type; * Age: ≥ 18 years old; * Karnofsky performance status ≥70; * Patients who are willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment, and other trial procedures.

Exclusion criteria

* Cranial radiotherapy in less than 10 fractions; * Prior brain irradiation; * Inability to complete magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedure due to claustrophobic anxiety; * Women who are pregnant or breast feeding; * Intention to become pregnant during the course of the trial; * Lack of safe contraception; * Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient discomfort with the two immobilization masksChange in patient discomfort through the course of radiation therapy, up to 6 weeksPatient discomfort measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 0-10 with no discomfort (scored as 0) and extreme discomfort (scored as 10).
Mask preferenceAt completion of radiation therapy, up to 6 weeks depending on radiation dose fractionationMask preference measured with the Yes/No questionnaire. Upon completion of radiation therapy patients will be asked which of the two immobilization masks they prefer - either Yes or No to one of the used masks.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment set-up accuracyThrough the course of radiation therapy, up to 6 weeksMeasured with planar kilovoltage (kV) imaging
Treatment intra-fraction accuracyThrough the course of radiation therapy, up to 6 weeksMeasured with an optic surface imaging (OSI) system
Immobilization-mask-induced severe adverse events during treatmentFrom the baseline to 3 months post-treatmentMeasured with CTCAE version 5.0
Location of discomfort on the head/faceChanges in location of discomfort on the head/face through the course of radiation therapy up to 6 weeksMeasured with the questionnaire consisting of a head/face diagram divided in 8 regions

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026