Skip to content

Stimulation and Validation of the Pupillary Dilation for the Detection of Pain in Analgosedated Patients Under Mechanically Ventilation in Intensive Care Unit

Stimulation Anda Validation of the Pupillary Dilation for the Detection of Pain in Analgosedated Patients Under Mechanically in Intensive Care Unit

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04078113
Enrollment
82
Registered
2019-09-04
Start date
2019-03-14
Completion date
2022-10-31
Last updated
2022-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Keywords

Pupillary dilation, Analgosedated, Mechanically ventilation

Brief summary

This project has 2 phases. Phase 1: diagnostic test study, to evaluate the efficacy of the variation of pupillary size (PDR) to detect pain in ICU patients regarding to Behavioural Pain Scale (BPS) and ESCID (Conductual Scale Pain Index). Phase 2: controlled and aleatorized clinical trial to evaluate efficacy in PDR monitoring after painful assessed minimum stimulus with the best diagnostic efficiency on phase 1, as a need of analgesia indicator tool. The sample will be patients over 18 years, sedated and mechanically ventilated, with an initial BPS of 3, RASS between -1 and -4, not able not to communicate , with inform consent signed. Exclusion criteria will be: ophtalmologic pathology and administration of drugs interfering pupillary reflexes. Measurements before/during pain/non-pain situations, aspiration of secretions and calibrated intensity stimulus through the pupilometer Algiscan. The investigators will study association between pain according to BPS/ESCID and pupillary dilatation according to pupillometry and percentage of patients with pain and preanalgesia according to pupillometry and standard clinical practice.

Interventions

Measurements of pupillary dilatation with pupillometer to administer or not analgesia

Sponsors

Basque Health Service
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients over 18 years. * Analgosedated patients under mechanical ventilation. * Unable to communicate (verbal or motor). * Patients with initial BPS of 3, and RASS from -1 to -4. * Familiar prior informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients treated with muscle relaxants. * Severe Critical Polyneuropathy. * Pupillary reflex affectation in diabetic patients (diabetic papillopathy,glaucomatous optic neuropathy) or any other pathologies like Adie´s Syndrome, Argyl-Robertson pupil. * Patients with tansmisible ocular infections. * Patients with possible injury of the third carnial nerve (Horner´s syndrome) due to injury to the brainstem, cervical cord, cancer of the upper lobe the lung, dissection of the carotid and/or cluster headache. * Acute cerbrovascular conditions with Glasgow Coma Scale less than 6, or increased intracranial pressure, or pontine base infarction. * Drugs that interfere with the pupillary reflex (clonidine, dexmedetomidine, metoclopramide, tramadol, droperidol, ketamine, nitrous oxide). * Patients under metoclopramide, if given 10 minutes prior the measurement of the pupillary reflex (PDR). * Patients during the first 24 hours after Cardiac Arrest (CRP). * Severe unestable comorbidity with doses of norepinephrine\> 0.6 microg/kg/min and/or dobutamine\>10 microg/kg/min or drenalin any doses. * Patients with untreated pheochromocytomas. * Refuse to participate in the trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Propotion of patient with pain on experimental group versus control groupAn average of 1 yearTo compare the proprtion of patients with pain according to Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS), pupillometry and Scale of Behaviour Indicators of Pain (escid)
Proportion of patient who require anesthesia on experimental group versus control groupAn average of 1 yearThe proportion of patients who require anesthesia on experimental group (previous analgesia according to pupillometry during endotracheal aspiration) versus control group (previous analgesia according to standard clinical practice).

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026