Skip to content

Lumbopelvic Biomechanical Variables and TMJ Kinematics Changes in Pregnant Women: A Case-Control Study

Lumbopelvic Biomechanical Variables and TMJ Kinematics Changes in Pregnant Women: A Case-Control Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04077775
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-09-04
Start date
2021-10-04
Completion date
2022-05-11
Last updated
2024-09-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Pain

Brief summary

The relationship between the pelvis and stomatognathic system: Various rationales for the relationship between the spine or pelvis and TMJ have been found. These theories include fascial, myological interrelationships, referred pain patterns and facilitating tonic neck reflexes involving inter segmental spinal pathways. A contributing mechanism could be the relationship between how TMJ occlusion, head position and body posture relate to the body's natural neurological visual/vestibular righting mechanism (Blum, 2004). There is a Correlation between the facial axis together with the lordotic angle and the pelvic inclination, the inner gonial angle and the mandibular plane with the lordotic angle and the pelvic inclination, as well as the facial depth with the pelvic inclination showed a significant correlation (Carsten et al., 2007).

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTassesment

assesment

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 40 Years

Inclusion criteria

* The age of the participants will be ranged from 20 to 40 years. Their body mass index will be ranged from 20 to 25 kg/m2. They will have regular menstrual cycle. They will not receive any hormonal therapy or taking any regular drugs.

Exclusion criteria

* Bone disease. Discogenic state with radiculopathy or not. Systemic disease of musculoskeletal system. Any sensory problems. Previous vertebral fractures. Major spinal structural abnormality. Major jaw abnormality. Any jaw orthotics or prosthesis. Missing teeth.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
body mass index3 monthsBMI in kg/m\^2
Satisfaction assessed by the VAS3 monthsDegrees of menstrual pain will be assessed using a VAS, which was a method of representing subjects' pain on a 10 cm linear scale. Score of 0 meant 'no pain' and 10 meant 'worst pain'. Tomeasure specific symptoms, such as the s
pelvic tilt in degrees:3 monthsThe blocks are released and the rods are placed over the crest of the ilium. The blocks are then pressed firmly toward the midline. Read the angle from the level. If the gauge reads over 21/2°, the result is listed as positive.Anterior pelvic tilting angle: PALM was used for measuring pelvic tilting angle. A mark was put on a point just inferior to ASIS; another mark was put just inferior to PSIS. The callipers of the PALM were put on these two points
jaw movement3 monthsMaximal vertical mouth opening (MIO): From sitting position, with the use of the calliper, the distance between the incisal edges along the midline of the upper and lower central incisors without pain was measured, by placing one end of the poley gauge against the incisal edge of one of the upper central incisors, and the other end against the incisal edge of the opposing lower incisor. The distance recorded in millimeters, the subjects was instructed to open your mouth as wide as possible without causing pain or discomfort. The poley gauge was sterilized with antiseptic solution before and after each measure
Spinal curves Measurement3 monthsspinal inclinations

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026