Skip to content

Improving Medication Prescribing-Related Outcomes for Vulnerable Elderly in Transitions

Improving Medication Prescribing-Related Outcomes for Vulnerable Elderly in Transitions (IMPROVE-IT): a Pilot Randomized Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04077281
Acronym
IMPROVE-IT
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-09-04
Start date
2023-06-01
Completion date
2024-11-07
Last updated
2024-12-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aged, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions, Health Care Costs, Patient Discharge

Keywords

Polypharmacy

Brief summary

Medication safety is a crucial health issue for every older Canadian since many of the medications causing serious harm are those which also have life-saving or important symptom-relieving benefits. Very few specialists can accurately advise seniors which medications provide more benefit than harm for them personally, and make changes safely as this requires a very large breadth and depth of knowledge about the patient, the conditions they have and their therapies. Now that telemedicine is compatible with smart phones, this extends the ability of scarce specialists to 'see' any patient in Canada in a way that is more convenient for the patient and may be less expensive than current care. This project will find out whether a unique Clinical Pharmacology specialist team in Hamilton, Ontario can improve medication safety (stop medications no longer needed, reduce doses where appropriate, change to safer medications) for a high risk group of older hospitalized Canadians taking many medications. The hospital where this pilot study will take place was the first to install the world's leading electronic health record and set it up to facilitate and support high quality research. Patients who volunteer will be assigned to their usual care, or to the intervention which is the Clinical Pharmacology specialist team approach starting in hospital and following up with the patient at home using telemedicine and detailed communication with them, their caregiver, family physician, community pharmacist and other specialists. The investigators will study whether the intervention is effective and cost-effective at reducing harmful medication burden, reducing the need to return to hospital, or improving the patient's ratings of their care coordination. The results will determine whether a subsequent large trial is worthwhile.

Interventions

OTHERMedication Coordinated care

* Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology consult * CPT team completes detailed circle of care communication * Telemedicine followup by CPT team (approximately 48 hrs post-discharge & 1 week to1 month post-discharge)

Sponsors

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults over the age of 65 years. * Admitted to Medicine or Surgery services for more than 2 days. * High cost users (defined as): * Have at least one other hospitalization within the previous year. * Taking 5 or more chronic medications including at least one TRIIM-Med. * Provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with do not approach status. * Patient or Caregiver not fluent in English. * Patients who do not provide informed consent. * Patients admitted for \< 2 days. * Patients \< 65 years of age. * Not a high cost user (as defined above).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility Outcome: Recruitment rate for eligible patients.Through the study completion, an average of 2 yearsThe main trial will be considered feasible if we are able to recruit at least 50% of eligible patients in this pilot.
Clinical Outcome: The number of TRIIM-Meds successfully deprescribed.2 months post dischargeThe number of TRIIM-Meds successfully deprescribed (dose reduction or discontinued) at 2 months post-hospital discharge, aiming to be able to detect a mean difference of 0.5.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility Outcomes of likelihood of the intervention proving cost-effective.Through the study completion, an average of 2 yearsThis will be measured using Healthcare resource utilization questionnaire, which will determine whether the intervention reduced healthcare costs compared to the control group.
Feasibility Outcomes of CPT consultation volume capacity and potential to apply the intervention entirely through telemedicine.Through the study completion, an average of 2 yearsThis will be measured based on the number of successfully enrolled patients, and the number of patients that will entirely undergo the intervention through telemedicine.
Patient-important outcomes: Health related quality of life: EQ-5D-5L2 months post dischargeThis outcome will be measured using the EuroQol five-dimensional, five-level descriptive system (EQ-5D-5L) that asks patients to self-assess their own health quality related quality of life. Whereas a scoring metric is used to assess the overall health related quality of life based on the answers to the questions. The questionnaire scale considers 1 as the best possible health and 5 as the worst health possible.
Patient-important outcomes: Participant ratings of coordination and continuity of transitions in care.2 months post dischargeThis outcome will be measured using the Coordination and Continuity of Care Questionnaire (CCCQ). Which is a questionnaire we adapted from the brief prepared questionnaire (B-PREPARED) and the three-question care transitions measure questionnaire (CTM-3).
Feasibility Outcomes of patient retention rate.Through the study completion, an average of 2 yearsThis will be measured by looking at the number of patients enrolled, the number of patients that dropped out, and the number of patients that completed the study.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026