Skip to content

Decreasing Body Dissatisfaction in Male College Athletes: A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Male Athlete Body Project

Decreasing Body Dissatisfaction in Male College Athletes: A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Male Athlete Body Project

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04077177
Enrollment
83
Registered
2019-09-04
Start date
2019-02-15
Completion date
2020-03-20
Last updated
2020-09-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Behavior

Brief summary

Body Dissatisfaction (BD) is associated with marked distress and often precipitates disordered eating symptomology (Milligan & Pritchard, 2006). BD in male athletes is an important area to explore, as research in this field often focuses on eating disorders in female athletes (e.g., Becker et al., 2012; Varnes et al., 2013). The current body of literature regarding male college athletes suggests that they experience pressures associated with both societal muscular ideals and sport performance (Galli et al., 2015). While there is a clear association between drive for muscularity and BD in collegiate male athletes (Galli et al., 2015), no study to date has conducted research aimed to attenuate the effect of BD in this population. The current study seeks to investigate a BD intervention for male college athletes. Participants will be randomized to an adapted version of the standardized Female Athlete Body Project (i.e., the Male Athlete Body Project) or an assessment only control condition. All participants will complete baseline and post-treatment measures of BD, negative affect, internalization of an athletic ideal, drive for muscularity, sport confidence, eating pathology, and unhealthy weight-control behaviors. Study aims are to determine if the Male Athlete Body Project intervention group reduces BD and related factors post-treatment, and to investigate whether these differences are maintained at 1-month follow up. Results will inform mental health and sport clinicians, coaches, and other personnel involved in an athlete's care about successful strategies for decreasing BD.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMale Athlete Body Project

Participants who meet eligibility criteria and consent to the study will be randomized to one of two conditions: intervention condition (i.e., Male Athlete Body Project) or an assessment only control condition. The intervention groups will take place at IIT. Participants who accept randomization to condition will complete baseline questionnaires after randomization (immediately prior to Session 1 in the intervention condition and after being randomized to the assessment only control condition). Questionnaires will be repeated immediately post-intervention (intervention condition)/after a 3-week interval (control). All participants will be asked to complete the questionnaires again, 4 weeks after the previous round of questionnaires. The 3, 80-minute group sessions will be separated by 1 week.

Sponsors

DePaul University
CollaboratorOTHER
Illinois Institute of Technology
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Male * member of a university-sponsored varsity athletic team * over age 18 * some endorsement of body dissatisfaction (i.e., scores greater than zero). To maximize generalizability, there are no additional inclusion criteria, consistent with recommendations from previous athlete Body Project research

Exclusion criteria

* NONE

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change is being assessed with Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire (MBSRQ) - Appearance ScaleParticipants will complete this at baseline, 3-week follow up, and 1-month follow-upThis measure assesses body dissatisfaction and appearance concerns over 34 items. The total score will not be interpreted; instead, subscale scores will be reported and interpreted. The subscales are: Appearance Evaluation, Appearance Orientation, Overweight Preoccupation, Self-Classified Weight, and the Body Areas Satisfaction Scale. For the Appearance Evaluation subscale, higher scores indicate a better outcome. Scores range from 7-35. For Appearance Orientation, higher scores indicate a worse outcome. Scores range from 12-60. For the Overweight Preoccupation subscale, higher scores represent a worse outcome. Scores range from 4-20. For Self-Classified Weight, higher scores represent the individual believing they are overweight. Scores range from 2-8. For the Body Areas Satisfaction Scale, higher scores indicate a better outcome. Scores range from 9-45.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026