Skip to content

First Trimester Risk Assessment Based on Ultrasound and Cell-free DNA vs Combined Screening

First Trimester Risk Assessment Based on Ultrasound and Cell-free DNA vs Combined Screening: Women's Experience

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04077060
Enrollment
40
Registered
2019-09-04
Start date
2019-08-26
Completion date
2020-02-15
Last updated
2020-02-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aneuploidy

Brief summary

There is an ongoing debate regarding how cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening can best be incorporated into current prenatal screening algorithms for chromosomal abnormalities. Test performance of cfDNA has been shown to be better that first-trimester combined screening (FTCS). However, the cost of the cfDNA testing is considered too high to adopt as first line screening. Moreover, FTCS includes a detailed ultrasound examination of the fetus with nuchal translucency (NT) measurement that allows for early detection of fetal abnormalities. An approach in which every woman are offered an early anatomy scan along with cfDNA may also be a reasonable option. Recently a randomized controlled trial, including 1,518 women with singleton pregnancy undergoing first-trimester screening, compared the screening performance of FTCS with an approach that uses the combination of a detailed ultrasound examination and cfDNA analysis. The trial showed that first-trimester risk assessment for trisomy 21 that includes a detailed ultrasound examination along cfDNA was associated with a significant reduction in the false-positive rate compared with FTCS. This approach obviates the need for maternal serum free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A in screening for fetal aneuploidy. Despite robust evidence on the very high detection rate of cfDNA in detecting trisomy 21, literature is lacking on data regarding women's experience and emotional well-being and satisfaction after test-results of women offered cfDNA compared to those offered FTCS.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTNIPT

Women randomized in the intervention group will be offered cfDNA screening, along with an early detailed anatomy scan, including nuchal measurement, at 11-13 weeks of gestation. cfDNA analysis will include a simultaneous microarray-based assay of non-polymorphic (chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y) and polymorphic loci to estimate chromosome proportion and fetal fraction. NIPT will be performed at the time of randomization or after if gestational age at randomization \< 9 6/7 weeks of gestation. Women in both groups will be given oral counseling by obstetricians and will be counseled about test procedures, reporting time, test sensitivity and specificity, and the necessity to confirm abnormal screening results with invasive testing.

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTcombined screening

Control group includes the standard of care. In our department, first-trimester risk assessment is performed routinely at 11-13 weeks of gestation by FTCS as per standard of care. FTCS includes crown-rump length, NT measurements, and a detailed ultrasound examination based on ISUOG guidelines. All operators who perform this examination are certified by the UK Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF). A specific risk for aneuploidy is not calculated if NT measurement is \>3.5 mm or if fetal anomaly is identified. These cases are deemed to be at a very high risk for chromosomal abnormalities and are offered invasive testing.

Sponsors

Federico II University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Pregnant women with singleton gestations * ≤12 6/7 weeks of gestation * Normal ultrasound examination at the time of randomization * \>18 \<45 years * Crown-rump length (CRL) \<84 mm at the time of randomization

Exclusion criteria

* Multiple gestations, including vanishing twins * \>12 6/7 weeks of gestation * Ectopic pregnancy * Abnormal ultrasound examination at the time of first prenatal visit * Women who are unconscious, severly ill, mentally handicapped, or under the age of 18 years. * Women who have already planned for invasive prenatal testing, e.g. for a history of prior child or pregnancy with chromosomal or genetic abnormalities * CRL \>84mm at the time of randomization

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
reassuranceat the time of screening testwomen will be asked about three questions, with up to 35 point for each question. 1) are you reassured about the test? 2) are you sure the test is correct? 3) test give me certain reassurance about the syndrome of my child
Anxietyat the time of screening testanxiety test assessed by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Satisfaction of the pregnant women11-13 weeks of gestationwomen will be asked if retrospectively they are happy with the assigned screening test as post-test satisfaction questionnaire: * Not all applicable (5 points) * Hardly applicable (10 points) * Somewhat applicable (20 points) * Very much applicable (35 points)
False positive rate1 week after testFalse positive rate for any trosomy and for trisomy 21

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026