Skip to content

Incorporating Nutrition, Vests, Education, and Strength Training in Bone Health (INVEST in Bone Health)

Incorporating Nutrition, Vests, Education, and Strength Training in Bone Health (INVEST in Bone Health)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04076618
Acronym
INVEST
Enrollment
150
Registered
2019-09-03
Start date
2020-08-12
Completion date
2024-04-01
Last updated
2025-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Weight Loss, Bone Health

Keywords

nutrition, vest

Brief summary

The main goal of the proposed study is to compare the effects of weight loss (WL) alone with WL plus weighted vest use or WL plus resistance exercise training (RT) on indicators of bone health and subsequent fracture risk.

Detailed description

The study team proposes that a 12 month trial in 150 older (60-85 years) adults with obesity (Body mass index or BMI=30-40 kg/m2 OR 27.0-\<30 kg/m² and one obesity-related risk factor) randomized to one of three interventions (n=50/group): WL alone (WL; caloric restriction targeting 10% WL); WL plus weighted vest use (WL+Vest); targeting ≥8 hours/day, weight replacement titrated up to 10% WL); or, WL plus structured RT (WL+RT; 3 days/week). Total hip trabecular volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) is the primary outcome. This outcome will be complemented by exploratory assessment of several fracture-related risk factors, including: (1) femoral neck and lumbar spine vBMD, cortical thickness, finite element modeling of bone strength, and regional fat and muscle volumes, measured by CT; (2) areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at the total hip, femoral neck, lumbar spine, and distal radius; trabecular bone score; and total body fat/lean masses, measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA); (3) muscle function and strength; (4) biomarkers of bone turnover; and (5) bone-regulating hormones/cytokines known to influence bone metabolism during WL. Therefore, the investigators Specific Aims are to: Aim 1: Determine the effects of WL+Vest compared to WL and WL+RT on 12 month change in total hip trabecular vBMD. Despite similar reductions in total body weight, Hypothesis 1: Participants in the WL+Vest group will show attenuated losses of total hip trabecular vBMD versus WL; and Hypothesis 2: Loss in total hip trabecular vBMD will be no greater in WL+Vest compared to WL+RT. Aim 2: Explore the effects of WL+Vest compared to WL and WL+RT on the 12 month change in fracture-related risk factors. Despite similar reductions in total body weight, we hypothesize that WL+Vest and WL+RT will demonstrate improvements in fracture-related risk factors compared to WL.

Interventions

DEVICEVest

Weighted Vest worn \> or = 8 hours per day

BEHAVIORALResistance Exercise Training

Structured exercise training 3 days a week

a 24-week intensive phase (with weekly dietary classes) followed by a 27-week transition phase (with biweekly dietary classes)

Sponsors

Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 60-85 years * BMI=30-40 kg/m\^2 or BMI 27.0-\<30.0 kg/m\^2 plus one risk factor * Weight stability - no weight loss \> 5% in past 6 months * No contraindications for safe and optimal participation in exercise training/vest use. * Approved for participation by Study Coordinator * Willing to provide informed consent; agree to all study procedures and assessments; Able to provide own transit to assessment/intervention visits * Willing to complete online/electronic study forms and participate in virtual group sessions, as needed.

Exclusion criteria

* Weight greater than 450 lbs * Dependent on cane or walker: \>2 falls (injurious on non-injurious) in past year * Any contraindications for participation in voluntary weight loss * Smoker (\>1 cigarette/d or 4/wk within yr); Excessive alcohol use (\>14 drinks/wk) * Participation in regular resistance training and/or high intensity/high impact aerobic exercise for \>60 mins per day on \> 5 days/week for the past 6 months * Evidence of cognitive impairment (MoCA\<20) * Osteoporosis (self-report and on prescription medication, T-score \< or = -2.5 on total hip, femoral neck, lumbar spine or distal radius scan at screening visit, or fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) 10-year risk scores \>3% for hip fracture or \>20% for major osteoporotic fracture (TBS adjusted FRAX is preferable if available) * Self-reported prior spine, hip, wrist, or shoulder fracture after age 40 (except when caused by trauma or fall from height) * Chronic back/shoulder/knee pain with current or past (within 1 year) prescription medication use for at least 3 months * Severe, diagnosed arthritis (osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or gout) with current or past (within 1 year) prescription medication use for at least 3 months * Past (ever) or planned (next 12 months) back surgery * Past (6 months prior) or planned (next 12 months) joint replacement surgery; or past (ever) unilateral or bilateral hip replacement surgery * Past (ever) metal device or fixation in the hip, pelvis, or femur * Uncontrolled hypertension (BP \> 160/90 mmHg) * Current or recent past (within 1 year) severe symptomatic heart disease, uncontrolled angina, stroke, chronic respiratory disease requiring oxygen, neurological or hematological disease requiring treatment for at least 3 months in past year * Cancer requiring treatment in past year, except non-melanoma skin cancer * Low Vitamin D (\<20 ng/mL) * Abnormal kidney or liver function (2x upper limits of normal) * estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)\<45 mL/min/1.73m2, * Anemia (Hb \<13 g/dL in men/\<12 g/dL in women) * Uncontrolled diabetes (fasting glucose \> 140 mg/dL) * Regular use of: growth hormones, weight loss medications, oral steroids, insulin, or prescription osteoporosis medications in the past year * No home computer, laptop or tablet with reliable home internet OR no smartphone (touch-screen enabled phone) with reliable unlimited mobile internet * Involved in another behavioral/interventional research study, weight loss program, or undergoing physical therapy. * Unable to tolerate diet, vest, or CT scan (claustrophobia) * Judged unsuitable for the trial for any reason by clinic staff

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Total Hip Trabecular Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (vBMD)12 months from baselinemeasured in mg/cm3 during computed tomography (CT) scan

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Lumbar Spine Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (vBMD)6 months from baselinemeasured in mg/cm3 during computed tomography (CT) scan
Change in Total Hip Trabecular Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (vBMD)6 months from baselinemeasured in mg/cm3 during computed tomography (CT) scan
Change in Trabecular Bone Score (TBS)6 months from baselinemeasurement taken during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan; Trabecular Bone Score is a measure of bone architecture that has been shown to be an independent risk factor for fracture. The measure is unitless, and ranges from 1.0-1.6, where an elevated TBS greater than or equal to 1.3 appears to represent strong, fracture-resistant bone architecture, while a low TBS less than or equal to 1.2 reflects weak, fracture-prone bone architecture.
Change in Total Hip Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)6 months from baselinemeasured in g/cm2 during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Change in Femoral Neck Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (vBMD)6 months from baselinemeasured in mg/cm3 during computed tomography (CT) scan
Change in Distal Radius Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)6 months from baselinemeasured in g/cm2 during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Change in Lumbar Spine Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)6 months from baselinemeasured in g/cm2 during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Change in Total Body Fat Mass (kg)6 months from baselinemeasurement taken during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Change in Total Body Lean Mass (kg)6 months from baselinemeasurement taken during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Change in Femoral Neck Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)6 months from baselinemeasured in g/cm2 during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gait Speed12 months from baselinemeasured in m/s during the 400 meter walk test
Expanded Short Physical Performance Battery (eSPPB)12 months from baselineThe SPPB is a measure of balance, walking speed, and ability to stand from a chair. It provides a global measure of overall physical function and is a good predictor of future disability, institutionalization, and mortality in older persons. The SPPB score is calculated by assigning each of the test measures (balance, walking speed, and chair stands) a score from 0 (unable to do) to 4 (best) and then adding these scores together for a total score ranging from 0 to 12. An SPPB score less than 10 identifies persons at higher risk for mobility disability.
Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG)12 months from baselinemeasured in seconds to assess physical performance; measures the time the participant takes to stand up from a standard chair, walk 3 meters, turn, walk back to the chair, and sit down again.
Stair Climbing Time12 months from baselinemeasured in seconds using the participant's fastest time achieved to climb a 12 step staircase in two trials.
Lower Extremity Muscle Strength12 months from baselinemeasured using an isokinetic dynamometer with the participant sitting and the hips and knee flexed at 90°. Participants will be asked to extend the knee and push as hard as possible against the resistance pad. Strength is expressed as peak torque (Nm)
Grip Strength12 months from baselinemeasured twice in each hand to the nearest two kg using an isometric Jamar Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer with the mean value from the stronger hand used
Mid-thigh Muscle Density Measured in Hounsfield Units (HU)12 months from baselinemeasurement taken during computed tomography (CT) scan
Fatigability12 months from baselinemeasured using the Pittsburgh Fatigability scale, which is a 10-item questionnaire that assesses fatigability, or the rate at which a person experiences mental or physical fatigue in the context of a standardized task. The scale ranges from 0-5, where those who exhibit more fatigability, score of 5, are more likely to limit activities of daily living and to reduce exertion during physical activities.
Pain and Fatigue12 months from baselinemeasured using The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instrument is an 8-item short-form that assesses pain and fatigue over the past 7 days. The scale ranges from 1-5, with higher scores indicated the presence of pain and fatigue.
Physical Activity Among Older Adults12 months from baselineThe CHAMPS questionnaire is a 40-43-item tool that assesses weekly frequency and duration of a variety of lifestyle physical activities that are appropriate for older adults. The purpose of this questionnaire is to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to increase lifestyle physical activity among older adults. Physical activities are given a METS score, ranging from 2.0-7.0, where activities with an activities of moderate intensity (METS) score of 3.0 or higher, are considered moderate intensity.
Overall Limb Loading6 months from baselinemeasured in Newtons via force-sensing insoles to assess overall limb loading and to determine if participants receive enough loading to prevent bone loss from resistance training and weighted vest use when compared to weight loss alone.
Overall Satisfaction Participating in the Optional Insole Visits6 months from baselineoverall satisfaction measured by a scale from 1-5 with a higher score indicating greater satisfaction
Cognitive Assessment12 months from baselinemeasured using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) with scores ranging from 0-30, with a score of 26 and higher generally considered normal.
Mid- Thigh Intermuscular Fat Cross Sectional Area (CSA) (cm2)12 months from baselinemeasurement taken during computed tomography (CT) scan
Cortical Thickness (mm)12 months from baselinemeasurement taken during computed tomography (CT) scan
Finite Element (FE) Modeling of Bone Strength Measured in Kilonewton (kN)12 months from baselinemeasurement taken during computed tomography (CT) scan
Mid-thigh Muscle CSA (cm2)12 months from baselinemeasurement taken during computed tomography (CT) scan
L3 Muscle Density Measured in HU12 months from baselinemeasurement taken during computed tomography (CT) scan
L3 Intermuscular Fat CSA (cm2)12 months from baselinemeasurement taken during computed tomography (CT) scan
L3 Muscle CSA (cm2)12 months from baselinemeasurement taken during computed tomography (CT) scan
Concentration of Procollagen 1 Intact N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) (ug/L)12 months from baselineBiomarkers of bone turnover measured via blood specimen
Concentration of C-terminal Telopeptide (CTX) (pg/mL)12 months from baselineBiomarkers of bone turnover measured via blood specimen
D3-Creatine Derived Muscle Mass Measured in kg12 months from baselinemeasurement taken via urine sample

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Weight Loss Plus Vest
Vest: Weighted Vest worn \> or = 8 hours per day weight loss program: a 24-week intensive phase (with weekly dietary classes) followed by a 27-week transition phase (with biweekly dietary classes)
50
Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise Training
Resistance Exercise Training: Structured exercise training 3 days a week weight loss program: a 24-week intensive phase (with weekly dietary classes) followed by a 27-week transition phase (with biweekly dietary classes)
50
Weight Loss
weight loss program: a 24-week intensive phase (with weekly dietary classes) followed by a 27-week transition phase (with biweekly dietary classes)
50
Total150

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event002
Overall StudyCOVID concerns010
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up213
Overall StudyRelocated out of state020
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject312

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicWeight LossWeight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise TrainingWeight Loss Plus VestTotal
Age, Continuous65.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2
66.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
66.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5
66.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6
Body Mass Index33.4 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3
33.6 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
33.8 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7
33.6 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3
Body Mass Index (kg/m2)92.3 Kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3
92.7 Kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
93.6 Kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
92.9 Kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8
Comorbidities
Arthritis/Joint Pain
36 Participants29 Participants39 Participants104 Participants
Comorbidities
Cardiovascular Disease
6 Participants6 Participants4 Participants16 Participants
Comorbidities
Diabetes
6 Participants1 Participants5 Participants12 Participants
Education
College
31 Participants27 Participants23 Participants81 Participants
Education
High School Equivalent
8 Participants7 Participants13 Participants28 Participants
Education
Post Graduate
11 Participants16 Participants14 Participants41 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
49 Participants49 Participants49 Participants147 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Fast Gait Speed1.3 Meters Per Second
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1
1.3 Meters Per Second
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2
1.3 Meters Per Second
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2
1.3 Meters Per Second
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2
Height166.0 Centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
166.0 Centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
166.5 Centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
166.2 Centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
Low Bone Mass26 Participants23 Participants24 Participants73 Participants
Moderate Intensity Physical Activity0 Minutes Per Week45 Minutes Per Week30 Minutes Per Week30 Minutes Per Week
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
12 Participants15 Participants16 Participants43 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
3 Participants0 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
35 Participants35 Participants33 Participants103 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
37 Participants38 Participants37 Participants112 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants12 Participants13 Participants38 Participants
Total Physical Activity2042 Kilocalories Per Week2144 Kilocalories Per Week1941 Kilocalories Per Week2029 Kilocalories Per Week

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 500 / 500 / 50
other
Total, other adverse events
23 / 5022 / 5020 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 501 / 502 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Total Hip Trabecular Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (vBMD)

measured in mg/cm3 during computed tomography (CT) scan

Time frame: 12 months from baseline

Population: 6 participants in Weight Loss Plus Vest arm did not complete a CT scan. 5 participants in Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise Training arm did not complete a scan. 7 participants in Weight Loss arm did not complete scan.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Weight Loss Plus VestChange in Total Hip Trabecular Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (vBMD)-0.002 mg/cm3
Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise TrainingChange in Total Hip Trabecular Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (vBMD)-0.002 mg/cm3
Weight LossChange in Total Hip Trabecular Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (vBMD)-0.003 mg/cm3
Secondary

Change in Distal Radius Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)

measured in g/cm2 during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan

Time frame: 12 months from baseline

Population: 5 participants in the Weight Loss Plus Vest arm did not complete DXA scan. 5 participants in the Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise Training arm did not complete DXA scan. 7 participants in the Weight Loss arm did not complete DXA scan.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Weight Loss Plus VestChange in Distal Radius Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)-0.013 g/cm2
Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise TrainingChange in Distal Radius Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)-0.007 g/cm2
Weight LossChange in Distal Radius Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)-0.013 g/cm2
Secondary

Change in Distal Radius Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)

measured in g/cm2 during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan

Time frame: 6 months from baseline

Population: 3 participants in the Weight Loss Plus Vest arm did not complete DXA scan. 3 participants in the Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise Training arm did not complete DXA scan. 5 participants in the Weight Loss arm did not complete DXA scan.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Weight Loss Plus VestChange in Distal Radius Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)-0.009 g/cm2
Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise TrainingChange in Distal Radius Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)-0.008 g/cm2
Weight LossChange in Distal Radius Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)-0.007 g/cm2
Secondary

Change in Femoral Neck Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)

measured in g/cm2 during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan

Time frame: 12 months from baseline

Population: 5 participants in Weight Loss Plus Vest arm did not complete DXA scan. 5 participants in Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise Training arm did not complete DXA scan. 7 participants in Weight Loss arm did not complete DXA scan.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Weight Loss Plus VestChange in Femoral Neck Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)-0.006 g/cm2
Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise TrainingChange in Femoral Neck Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)-0.004 g/cm2
Weight LossChange in Femoral Neck Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)-0.005 g/cm2
Secondary

Change in Femoral Neck Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)

measured in g/cm2 during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan

Time frame: 6 months from baseline

Population: 3 participants in Weight Loss Plus Vest arm did not complete DXA scan. 3 participants in Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise Training arm did not complete DXA scan. 5 participants in Weight Loss arm did not complete DXA scan.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Weight Loss Plus VestChange in Femoral Neck Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)-0.000 g/cm2
Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise TrainingChange in Femoral Neck Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)0.004 g/cm2
Weight LossChange in Femoral Neck Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)0.004 g/cm2
Secondary

Change in Femoral Neck Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (vBMD)

measured in mg/cm3 during computed tomography (CT) scan

Time frame: 6 months from baseline

Population: 4 participants in Weight Loss Plus Vest arm did not complete a CT scan. 4 participants in Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise Training arm did not complete a scan. 6 participants in Weight Loss arm did not complete scan.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Weight Loss Plus VestChange in Femoral Neck Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (vBMD)-0.001 mg/cm3
Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise TrainingChange in Femoral Neck Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (vBMD)-0.001 mg/cm3
Weight LossChange in Femoral Neck Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (vBMD)-0.001 mg/cm3
Secondary

Change in Femoral Neck Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (vBMD)

measured in mg/cm3 during computed tomography (CT) scan

Time frame: 12 months from baseline

Population: 6 participants in Weight Loss Plus Vest arm did not complete a CT scan. 5 participants in Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise Training arm did not complete a scan. 7 participants in Weight Loss arm did not complete scan.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Weight Loss Plus VestChange in Femoral Neck Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (vBMD)-0.002 mg/cm3
Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise TrainingChange in Femoral Neck Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (vBMD)-0.003 mg/cm3
Weight LossChange in Femoral Neck Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (vBMD)-0.004 mg/cm3
Secondary

Change in Lumbar Spine Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)

measured in g/cm2 during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan

Time frame: 6 months from baseline

Population: 3 participants in Weight Loss Plus Vest arm did not complete DXA scan. 3 participants in Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise Training arm did not complete DXA scan. 5 participants in Weight Loss arm did not complete DXA scan.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Weight Loss Plus VestChange in Lumbar Spine Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)0.003 g/cm2
Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise TrainingChange in Lumbar Spine Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)0.015 g/cm2
Weight LossChange in Lumbar Spine Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)0.016 g/cm2
Secondary

Change in Lumbar Spine Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)

measured in g/cm2 during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan

Time frame: 12 months from baseline

Population: 5 participants in Weight Loss Plus Vest arm did not complete DXA scan. 5 participants in Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise Training arm did not complete DXA scan. 7 participants in Weight Loss arm did not complete DXA scan.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Weight Loss Plus VestChange in Lumbar Spine Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)0.006 g/cm2
Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise TrainingChange in Lumbar Spine Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)0.011 g/cm2
Weight LossChange in Lumbar Spine Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)0.010 g/cm2
Secondary

Change in Lumbar Spine Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (vBMD)

measured in mg/cm3 during computed tomography (CT) scan

Time frame: 6 months from baseline

Population: 3 participants in Weight Loss Plus Vest arm did not complete the scan. 4 participants in Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise Training arm did not complete the scan. 5 participants in the Weight Loss arm did not complete the scan.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Weight Loss Plus VestChange in Lumbar Spine Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (vBMD)0.001 mg/cm3
Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise TrainingChange in Lumbar Spine Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (vBMD)0.005 mg/cm3
Weight LossChange in Lumbar Spine Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (vBMD)0.005 mg/cm3
Secondary

Change in Lumbar Spine Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (vBMD)

measured in mg/cm3 during computed tomography (CT) scan

Time frame: 12 months from baseline

Population: 5 participants in Weight Loss Plus Vest arm did not complete the scan. 5 participants in Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise Training arm did not complete the scan. 7 participants in the Weight Loss arm did not complete the scan.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Weight Loss Plus VestChange in Lumbar Spine Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (vBMD)-0.000 mg/cm3
Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise TrainingChange in Lumbar Spine Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (vBMD)0.003 mg/cm3
Weight LossChange in Lumbar Spine Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (vBMD)0.000 mg/cm3
Secondary

Change in Total Body Fat Mass (kg)

measurement taken during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan

Time frame: 12 months from baseline

Population: 5 participants in Weight Loss Plus Vest arm did not complete DXA scan. 5 participants in Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise Training arm did not complete DXA scan. 7 participants in Weight Loss arm did not complete DXA scan.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Weight Loss Plus VestChange in Total Body Fat Mass (kg)-7.3 kg
Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise TrainingChange in Total Body Fat Mass (kg)-10.0 kg
Weight LossChange in Total Body Fat Mass (kg)-7.7 kg
Secondary

Change in Total Body Fat Mass (kg)

measurement taken during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan

Time frame: 6 months from baseline

Population: 3 participants in Weight Loss Plus Vest arm did not complete DXA scan. 3 participants in Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise Training arm did not complete DXA scan. 5 participants in Weight Loss arm did not complete DXA scan.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Weight Loss Plus VestChange in Total Body Fat Mass (kg)-7.8 kg
Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise TrainingChange in Total Body Fat Mass (kg)-8.8 kg
Weight LossChange in Total Body Fat Mass (kg)-7.8 kg
Secondary

Change in Total Body Lean Mass (kg)

measurement taken during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)

Time frame: 12 months from baseline

Population: 5 participants in Weight Loss Plus Vest arm did not complete DXA scan. 5 participants in Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise Training arm did not complete DXA scan. 7 participants in Weight Loss arm did not complete DXA scan.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Weight Loss Plus VestChange in Total Body Lean Mass (kg)-0.7 kg
Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise TrainingChange in Total Body Lean Mass (kg)-0.9 kg
Weight LossChange in Total Body Lean Mass (kg)-0.9 kg
Secondary

Change in Total Body Lean Mass (kg)

measurement taken during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)

Time frame: 6 months from baseline

Population: 3 participants in Weight Loss Plus Vest arm did not complete DXA scan. 3 participants in Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise Training arm did not complete DXA scan. 5 participants in Weight Loss arm did not complete DXA scan.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Weight Loss Plus VestChange in Total Body Lean Mass (kg)-0.5 kg
Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise TrainingChange in Total Body Lean Mass (kg)-0.8 kg
Weight LossChange in Total Body Lean Mass (kg)-0.7 kg
Secondary

Change in Total Hip Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)

measured in g/cm2 during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan

Time frame: 6 months from baseline

Population: 3 participants in Weight Loss Plus Vest did not complete DXA scan. 3 participants in Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise Training arm did not complete DXA scan. 5 participants in Weight Loss arm did not complete DXA scan.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Weight Loss Plus VestChange in Total Hip Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)-0.006 g/cm2
Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise TrainingChange in Total Hip Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)-0.008 g/cm2
Weight LossChange in Total Hip Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)-0.008 g/cm2
Secondary

Change in Total Hip Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)

measured in g/cm2 during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan

Time frame: 12 months from baseline

Population: 5 participants in Weight Loss Plus Vest did not complete DXA scan. 5 participants in Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise Training arm did not complete DXA scan. 7 participants in Weight Loss arm did not complete DXA scan.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Weight Loss Plus VestChange in Total Hip Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)-0.015 g/cm2
Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise TrainingChange in Total Hip Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)-0.016 g/cm2
Weight LossChange in Total Hip Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)-0.017 g/cm2
Secondary

Change in Total Hip Trabecular Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (vBMD)

measured in mg/cm3 during computed tomography (CT) scan

Time frame: 6 months from baseline

Population: 4 participants in Weight Loss Plus Vest arm did not complete a CT scan. 4 participants in Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise Training arm did not complete a scan. 6 participants in Weight Loss arm did not complete scan.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Weight Loss Plus VestChange in Total Hip Trabecular Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (vBMD)-0.001 mg/cm3
Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise TrainingChange in Total Hip Trabecular Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (vBMD)-0.000 mg/cm3
Weight LossChange in Total Hip Trabecular Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (vBMD)-0.000 mg/cm3
Secondary

Change in Trabecular Bone Score (TBS)

measurement taken during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan; Trabecular Bone Score is a measure of bone architecture that has been shown to be an independent risk factor for fracture. The measure is unitless, and ranges from 1.0-1.6, where an elevated TBS greater than or equal to 1.3 appears to represent strong, fracture-resistant bone architecture, while a low TBS less than or equal to 1.2 reflects weak, fracture-prone bone architecture.

Time frame: 12 months from baseline

Population: 5 participants in Weight Loss Plus Vest arm did not complete DXA scan. 5 participants in Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise Training Arm did not complete DXA scan. 7 participants in Weight Loss arm did not complete DXA scan.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Weight Loss Plus VestChange in Trabecular Bone Score (TBS)0.014 score on a scale
Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise TrainingChange in Trabecular Bone Score (TBS)0.037 score on a scale
Weight LossChange in Trabecular Bone Score (TBS)0.017 score on a scale
Secondary

Change in Trabecular Bone Score (TBS)

measurement taken during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan; Trabecular Bone Score is a measure of bone architecture that has been shown to be an independent risk factor for fracture. The measure is unitless, and ranges from 1.0-1.6, where an elevated TBS greater than or equal to 1.3 appears to represent strong, fracture-resistant bone architecture, while a low TBS less than or equal to 1.2 reflects weak, fracture-prone bone architecture.

Time frame: 6 months from baseline

Population: 3 participants in Weight Loss Plus Vest arm did not complete DXA scan. 3 participants in Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise Training Arm did not complete DXA scan. 5 participants in Weight Loss arm did not complete DXA scan.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Weight Loss Plus VestChange in Trabecular Bone Score (TBS)0.020 score on a scale
Weight Loss Plus Resistance Exercise TrainingChange in Trabecular Bone Score (TBS)0.037 score on a scale
Weight LossChange in Trabecular Bone Score (TBS)0.017 score on a scale
Other Pre-specified

Cognitive Assessment

measured using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) with scores ranging from 0-30, with a score of 26 and higher generally considered normal.

Time frame: 12 months from baseline

Other Pre-specified

Concentration of C-terminal Telopeptide (CTX) (pg/mL)

Biomarkers of bone turnover measured via blood specimen

Time frame: 12 months from baseline

Other Pre-specified

Concentration of Procollagen 1 Intact N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) (ug/L)

Biomarkers of bone turnover measured via blood specimen

Time frame: 12 months from baseline

Other Pre-specified

Cortical Thickness (mm)

measurement taken during computed tomography (CT) scan

Time frame: 12 months from baseline

Other Pre-specified

D3-Creatine Derived Muscle Mass Measured in kg

measurement taken via urine sample

Time frame: 12 months from baseline

Other Pre-specified

Expanded Short Physical Performance Battery (eSPPB)

The SPPB is a measure of balance, walking speed, and ability to stand from a chair. It provides a global measure of overall physical function and is a good predictor of future disability, institutionalization, and mortality in older persons. The SPPB score is calculated by assigning each of the test measures (balance, walking speed, and chair stands) a score from 0 (unable to do) to 4 (best) and then adding these scores together for a total score ranging from 0 to 12. An SPPB score less than 10 identifies persons at higher risk for mobility disability.

Time frame: 12 months from baseline

Other Pre-specified

Fatigability

measured using the Pittsburgh Fatigability scale, which is a 10-item questionnaire that assesses fatigability, or the rate at which a person experiences mental or physical fatigue in the context of a standardized task. The scale ranges from 0-5, where those who exhibit more fatigability, score of 5, are more likely to limit activities of daily living and to reduce exertion during physical activities.

Time frame: 12 months from baseline

Other Pre-specified

Finite Element (FE) Modeling of Bone Strength Measured in Kilonewton (kN)

measurement taken during computed tomography (CT) scan

Time frame: 12 months from baseline

Other Pre-specified

Gait Speed

measured in m/s during the 400 meter walk test

Time frame: 12 months from baseline

Other Pre-specified

Grip Strength

measured twice in each hand to the nearest two kg using an isometric Jamar Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer with the mean value from the stronger hand used

Time frame: 12 months from baseline

Other Pre-specified

L3 Intermuscular Fat CSA (cm2)

measurement taken during computed tomography (CT) scan

Time frame: 12 months from baseline

Other Pre-specified

L3 Muscle CSA (cm2)

measurement taken during computed tomography (CT) scan

Time frame: 12 months from baseline

Other Pre-specified

L3 Muscle Density Measured in HU

measurement taken during computed tomography (CT) scan

Time frame: 12 months from baseline

Other Pre-specified

Lower Extremity Muscle Strength

measured using an isokinetic dynamometer with the participant sitting and the hips and knee flexed at 90°. Participants will be asked to extend the knee and push as hard as possible against the resistance pad. Strength is expressed as peak torque (Nm)

Time frame: 12 months from baseline

Other Pre-specified

Mid- Thigh Intermuscular Fat Cross Sectional Area (CSA) (cm2)

measurement taken during computed tomography (CT) scan

Time frame: 12 months from baseline

Other Pre-specified

Mid-thigh Muscle CSA (cm2)

measurement taken during computed tomography (CT) scan

Time frame: 12 months from baseline

Other Pre-specified

Mid-thigh Muscle Density Measured in Hounsfield Units (HU)

measurement taken during computed tomography (CT) scan

Time frame: 12 months from baseline

Other Pre-specified

Overall Limb Loading

measured in Newtons via force-sensing insoles to assess overall limb loading and to determine if participants receive enough loading to prevent bone loss from resistance training and weighted vest use when compared to weight loss alone.

Time frame: 6 months from baseline

Other Pre-specified

Overall Satisfaction Participating in the Optional Insole Visits

overall satisfaction measured by a scale from 1-5 with a higher score indicating greater satisfaction

Time frame: 6 months from baseline

Other Pre-specified

Pain and Fatigue

measured using The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instrument is an 8-item short-form that assesses pain and fatigue over the past 7 days. The scale ranges from 1-5, with higher scores indicated the presence of pain and fatigue.

Time frame: 12 months from baseline

Other Pre-specified

Physical Activity Among Older Adults

The CHAMPS questionnaire is a 40-43-item tool that assesses weekly frequency and duration of a variety of lifestyle physical activities that are appropriate for older adults. The purpose of this questionnaire is to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to increase lifestyle physical activity among older adults. Physical activities are given a METS score, ranging from 2.0-7.0, where activities with an activities of moderate intensity (METS) score of 3.0 or higher, are considered moderate intensity.

Time frame: 12 months from baseline

Other Pre-specified

Stair Climbing Time

measured in seconds using the participant's fastest time achieved to climb a 12 step staircase in two trials.

Time frame: 12 months from baseline

Other Pre-specified

Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG)

measured in seconds to assess physical performance; measures the time the participant takes to stand up from a standard chair, walk 3 meters, turn, walk back to the chair, and sit down again.

Time frame: 12 months from baseline

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026