Skip to content

Brain-derived Neurotrophic Factor and the Antidepressant Efficacy of Brain Stimulation

Different Forms of Prefrontal Transcranial Stimulation and Brain-derived Neurotrophic Factor in the Prediction of Antidepressant Efficacy of Brain Stimulation

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04076124
Enrollment
120
Registered
2019-09-03
Start date
2019-07-24
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2019-09-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Treatment Resistant Depression

Brief summary

This study evaluates an association between brain-derived neurotrophic factor(BDNF) polymorphisms and the antidepressant efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation device in patients with treatment-resistant depression. In a double-blind design, All patients are randomized to three groups, i.e.repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment, intermittent theta-burst stimulation treatment or sham treatment.

Interventions

DEVICEActive rTMS-DLPFC

Participants in the rTMS active stimulation group will receive 4-week 10 Hz 120% of RMT to left DLPFC. Left side DLPFC will be targeted by MRI-neuronavigation system. Stimulation will be delivered to the L-DLPFC using a Magstim stimulator.

Participants in the intermittent TBS(iTBS) active stimulation group will receive 4-week three-pulse 50-Hz bursts administered every 200 milliseconds (at 5 Hz) at an intensity of 80% active motor threshold (MT) to left DLPFC. Left side DLPFC will be targeted by MRI-neuronavigation system. Stimulation will be delivered to the L-DLPFC using a Magstim stimulator.

DEVICESham TBS-DLPFC or Sham rTMS-DLPFC

Half of the patients in the sham group received 4-week the same iTBS parameter stimulation (sham-iTBS), and the other half received the same rTMS parameter stimulation using a sham coil (sham-rTMS), which also improved the blinding process.

Sponsors

Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female, 21 to 70 years of age. * Diagnosed with the recurrent Major depressive disorder (MDD) and currently having a Major Depressive Episode (MDE) * Participants failed to respond to at least one adequate antidepressant treatment in their current episode * Participants have a Clinical Global Impression - Severity score of at least 4 and a total score of at least 18 on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) at both screening and baseline visits ( Day -14 and Day 0) * Participants must discontinue their antidepressant medications at least for one week ( at least two weeks if Fluoxetine) prior to the TMS intervention and keep antidepressant-free during the study duration.

Exclusion criteria

* a lifetime psychiatric history of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, psychotic disorders, or organic mental disorder including substance abuse and dependence (based on DSM-IV criteria) * Participants with a lifetime medical history of major systemic illness and clinically significantly abnormal screening examination that might affect safety, study participation, or confound interpretation of study results. * Participants with a lifetime medical history of neurological disorder records (e.g., stroke, seizure, traumatic brain injury, post brain surgery), brain implants (neurostimulators), cardiac pacemakers * Women with breastfeeding or pregnancy * Participants with a current strong suicidal risk (i.e., a score of 4 on item 3 of the HDRS-17)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage change in 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating ScaleBaseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4(day 20)the altered percentage of 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (range, 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating more depression)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Remission rate after 4-week treatmentBaseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, week 16 (day 80)17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale ≤7 (range, 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating more depression)
Changes in Clinical Global IndexBaseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4(day 20)Clinical Global Index
Changes in depression severity, rated by self-reportedBaseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4(day 20)Depression and Somatic Symptoms Scale, range from 0 to 66 with higher scores indicating more depressive and somatic symptom.
Changes in Young Mania Rating ScaleBaseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4(day 20)Young Mania Rating Scale, range from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating more severe manic symptoms.
Response rate after 4-week treatment at the end of TMS sessions and three month after.Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, week 16 (day 80)improvement \> 50 % of 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (range, 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating more depression)
The association between the value of baseline brain metabolism and the antidepressant efficacy of brain stimulationBaseline, Week 4(day 20)baseline PET/MRI.The antidepressant efficacy defined by the altered percentage of 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.
The association between the value of Baseline treatment refractory level and the antidepressant efficacy of brain stimulationBaseline, Week 4(day 20)Maudsley staging method. The antidepressant efficacy defined by the altered percentage of 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.
The association between the value pf baseline Life event stress scale and the antidepressant efficacy of brain stimulationBaseline, Week 4(day 20)Life event stress scale,range from 0 to 1467 with higher scores indicating more life event stress. The antidepressant efficacy defined by the altered percentage of 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.
Changes in EEG band before and after brain stimulationDay 1(pre-RECT, post RECT, post 1st treatment, pre-20th treatment)Perform rACC-engaging cognitive task(RECT) before 1-st treatment
The association between BDNF Polymorphism genotype and the antidepressant efficacy of brain stimulationBaseline, Week 4(day 20)Val/Val, Met/Met, Val/Met genotype and the efficacy after receiving 4-week treatment. The antidepressant efficacy defined by the altered percentage of 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

Primary ContactCheng-Ta Li, Professor
ctli2@vghtpe.gov.tw886 -2- 28757027

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026