Skip to content

Atrial Fibrillation Health Literacy and Information Technology Trial

A Mobile Relational Agent to Enhance Atrial Fibrillation Self-care

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04075994
Acronym
AFibLITT
Enrollment
243
Registered
2019-09-03
Start date
2020-01-02
Completion date
2023-08-01
Last updated
2024-05-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arrythmia, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation, Familial Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Diseases, Pathologic Processes

Keywords

Quality of Life (QoL), Adherence, Health Literacy

Brief summary

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common, morbid condition with increasing prevalence. Poor health-related quality of life is common in AF. Patients experience debilitating symptoms and challenging adherence to long-term (possibly lifelong) anticoagulation. The increased risks of stroke, heart failure and mortality associated with AF persist even with optimal treatment. Morbidity in AF is further exacerbated by social factors. Limited health literacy carries challenges of learning a specialized terminology and navigating specialized treatments. In multiple cardiovascular diseases, self-care has demonstrated improvement in self-efficacy, health-related quality of life, symptom burden, and health care utilization - essential components of patient success with AF. Selfcare can provide the critical skills to navigate a challenging chronic disease and improve patient-centered outcomes. Delivery of self-care as a mobile health intervention can complement standard care with a longitudinal intervention to improve patient-centered strategies for AF. While self-care interventions for AF have focused foremost on self-monitoring of anticoagulation,self-care has demonstrated its potential to meet the triple aim of improved patient experience, reduced health care utilization, and lower costs.

Detailed description

This is a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effect of a smartphone-based intervention called a relational agent on health outcomes in people with atrial fibrillation. The study will enroll 240 patients who reside in Pittsburgh-area with this condition and will randomize them to the intervention or control. Intervention participants will receive a smartphone with the agent, which simulates conversation. In addition they will receive an AliveCor Kardia for heart rate and rhythm monitoring, an FDA-approved, widely used instrument that pairs with the smartphone. Control participants will receive a smartphone with WebMD, a brochure published by the American Heart Association that describes AF, and an AliveCor Kardia. The intervention will last 4 months and participants will have visits at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 months. The study will evaluate the improvement in quality of life, medical adherence and health care utilization resulting from the intervention.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALRelational Agent and heart rate and rhythm monitor

Use of the Relational Agent and heart rate and rhythm monitor daily for 120 days.

BEHAVIORALUsual Care

Use of the WebMD app and heart rate and rhythm monitor daily for 120 days.

Sponsors

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
Northeastern University
CollaboratorOTHER
Boston University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Pittsburgh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adult, age ≥21; 2. Diagnosis of AF, identified from the electronic health record problem list and confirmed by 2 or more reports of AF from separate monitoring events at least 2 weeks apart (electrocardiogram, Holter or event monitor); 3. CHA2DS2-VASc (heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack, coronary heart disease, female sex)≥2; 4. Prescribed use of warfarin or direct-acting oral anticoagulant for AF stroke prevention; 5. English-speaking well enough to participate in informed consent and this study; 6. No plans to relocate from the area within 12 months of enrollment.

Exclusion criteria

1. Conditions other than AF that require anticoagulation, such as mechanical prosthetic valve, deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism; 2. History of pulmonary vein isolation or foreseen pulmonary vein isolation; 3. History of atrioventricular nodal ablation or foreseen atrioventricular nodal ablation; 4. Heart failure necessitating hospital admission ≤3 months prior to study inclusion; 5. Acute coronary syndrome (defined as at least 2 of the following: chest pain, ischemic electrocardiographic changes, or troponin ≥0.1 ng/mL) ≤3 months prior to study inclusion; 6. Untreated hyperthyroidism or ≤3 months euthyroidism before inclusion; 7. Foreseen pacemaker, internal cardioverter defibrillator, or cardiac resynchronization therapy; 8. Cardiac surgery ≤3 months before inclusion; 9. Planned cardiac surgery; 10. Presence of non-cardiovascular conditions likely to be fatal within 12 months (e.g., cancer); 11. Inability to comprehend the study protocol, defined as failing to answer correctly a set of questions on orientation and short-term memory during the consent process.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Days Covered12 monthsProportion of Days Covered (PDC), obtained from collection of electronic prescription and pharmacy fill data, and defined as the proportion of availability of medication for the period of interest, here the period from the date of the baseline to the 12-month examination. PDC range is 0 to 1.00 with higher values indicating greater proportion of days with medication over the 12-month period of study participation as indicated by pharmacy records.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-reported Non-adherence4, 8 and 12 monthsSelf-reported non-adherence to oral anticoagulation with a 3-item instrument with each item scored 1-5 and lower scores indicating adherence. Scores dichotomized to classify participants as adherent (indicated by reporting 1 on all 3 items) or as non-adherent (indicated by reporting ≥ 2 on any of the 3 items).
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-294, 8, and 12 monthsMeasure Description: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29 assesses 7 domains (physical function; depression and sadness; pain interference; satisfaction with participation in social roles and activities; fatigue; anxiety and fear; sleep disturbance), 4 questions each, and Pain Intensity with a single item. The 7 domain scores are transformed using a T-score with a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10, in a referent population. Higher scores indicate worse health for the depression, pain, fatigue, anxiety/sleep domains, while higher scores indicate better health for the physical function and satisfaction domains. The single Pain Intensity item is scored 0 (No pain) to 10 (Worst imaginable pain) in the past 7 days. Further details on PROMIS scoring are available at https://www.healthmeasures.net/images/PROMIS/manuals/PROMIS\_Adult\_Profile\_Scoring\_Manual.pdf.
Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT)4, 8 and 12 monthsThe Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of life (AFEQT) is a widely used measure of atrial fibrillation-specific health-related quality of life. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating superior health-related quality of life in AF.
Emergency Room (ER) Visits and Hospitalizations12 monthsThe number of emergency room visits and hospitalizations quantified at 12 months.
Days of Hospitalization12 monthsThe number of days of hospitalization ascertained from extraction of electronic health records through the 12 months of study duration. Total days spent in hospital over 12 months were summarized as a single count for each participant.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intervention
Receive the relational agent coupled with the AliveCor Kardia heart rate and rhythm monitor for 120-day use. Relational Agent and heart rate and rhythm monitor: Use of the Relational Agent and heart rate and rhythm monitor daily for 120 days.
123
Usual Care
Receive a brochure on atrial fibrillation, the WebMD app and the AliveCor Kardia heart rate and rhythm monitor for 120-day use. Usual Care: Use of the WebMD app and heart rate and rhythm monitor daily for 120 days.
120
Total243

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event22
Overall StudyInvestigator withdrew31
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject89

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInterventionTotalUsual Care
AF Effect on Quality of Life
Daily Activities Score
66.7 units on a scale66.7 units on a scale65.6 units on a scale
AF Effect on Quality of Life
Overall Score
74.1 units on a scale74.1 units on a scale73.6 units on a scale
AF Effect on Quality of Life
Satisfaction with how well your current treatment controls your AF
83.3 units on a scale83.3 units on a scale83.3 units on a scale
AF Effect on Quality of Life
Satisfaction with the extent that treatment has relieved your symptoms of AF
83.3 units on a scale83.3 units on a scale83.3 units on a scale
AF Effect on Quality of Life
Symptoms Score
87.5 units on a scale91.7 units on a scale91.7 units on a scale
AF Effect on Quality of Life
Treatment Concerns Score
83.3 units on a scale80.6 units on a scale80.6 units on a scale
Age, Continuous71.9 years71.7 years71.3 years
Approximate years with Atrial Fibrillation4 years4 years4 years
Body Mass Index (BMI)31.7 Weight (kg) / Height^2(m^2)31.2 Weight (kg) / Height^2(m^2)29.9 Weight (kg) / Height^2(m^2)
Brief Health Literacy Screening Instrument
Adequate
102 Participants187 Participants85 Participants
Brief Health Literacy Screening Instrument
Limited
7 Participants15 Participants8 Participants
Brief Health Literacy Screening Instrument
Moderate
14 Participants41 Participants27 Participants
Education
Associate degree
15 Participants30 Participants15 Participants
Education
Bachelor degree
20 Participants37 Participants17 Participants
Education
Graduate/professional school
29 Participants50 Participants21 Participants
Education
High school graduate
22 Participants47 Participants25 Participants
Education
Some college with no degree
20 Participants42 Participants22 Participants
Education
Some high school with no certificate
3 Participants7 Participants4 Participants
Education
Some vocational/trade school with no certificate
3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Education
Unknown
5 Participants12 Participants7 Participants
Education
Vocational/trade certificate
6 Participants13 Participants7 Participants
Employment Status
Employed but temporarily laid off
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Employment Status
Homemaker, not working outside the home
3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Employment Status
Retired from my usual job and not working
82 Participants159 Participants77 Participants
Employment Status
Retired from my usual job but working for pay
11 Participants20 Participants9 Participants
Employment Status
Sick or on leave for health reasons
3 Participants6 Participants3 Participants
Employment Status
Unemployed, looking for work
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Employment Status
Unemployed, not looking for work
3 Participants11 Participants8 Participants
Employment Status
Working now, full time
13 Participants27 Participants14 Participants
Employment Status
Working now, part time
7 Participants12 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
123 Participants240 Participants117 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
General Health
Excellent
5 Participants9 Participants4 Participants
General Health
Fair
34 Participants63 Participants29 Participants
General Health
Good
48 Participants95 Participants47 Participants
General Health
Poor
8 Participants16 Participants8 Participants
General Health
Very Good
28 Participants60 Participants32 Participants
Health literacy
Adequate health literacy
73 Participants143 Participants70 Participants
Health literacy
High likelihood of limited health literacy
20 Participants40 Participants20 Participants
Health literacy
Possibility of limited health literacy
30 Participants60 Participants30 Participants
Marital Status
Married or living as such
62 Participants121 Participants59 Participants
Marital Status
Never married/never lived as married
21 Participants44 Participants23 Participants
Marital Status
Separated or divorced
15 Participants33 Participants18 Participants
Marital Status
Widowed
25 Participants45 Participants20 Participants
Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Not assessed
77 Participants152 Participants75 Participants
Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Score greater than or equal to 19
33 Participants70 Participants37 Participants
Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Score less than 19
13 Participants21 Participants8 Participants
Non-adherence to oral anticoagulation
No
107 Participants210 Participants103 Participants
Non-adherence to oral anticoagulation
Yes
16 Participants33 Participants17 Participants
Patient Health Questionnaire-83 units on a scale3 units on a scale3 units on a scale
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29 item instrument (PROMIS-29)-29
Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities (T-score)
51.9 Score on a scale51.9 Score on a scale51.9 Score on a scale
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29 item instrument (PROMIS-29)-29
Anxiety (T-score)
40.3 Score on a scale48.0 Score on a scale48.0 Score on a scale
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29 item instrument (PROMIS-29)-29
Depression (T-score)
41.0 Score on a scale41.0 Score on a scale41.0 Score on a scale
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29 item instrument (PROMIS-29)-29
Fatigue (T-score)
51.0 Score on a scale51.0 Score on a scale51.0 Score on a scale
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29 item instrument (PROMIS-29)-29
Pain Intensity (Global07)
3 Score on a scale3 Score on a scale3 Score on a scale
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29 item instrument (PROMIS-29)-29
Pain Interference (T-score)
55.6 Score on a scale53.9 Score on a scale53.9 Score on a scale
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29 item instrument (PROMIS-29)-29
Physical Function (T-score)
40.5 Score on a scale41.9 Score on a scale43.5 Score on a scale
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29 item instrument (PROMIS-29)-29
Sleep Disturbance (T-score)
50.5 Score on a scale50.5 Score on a scale50.5 Score on a scale
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
36 Participants74 Participants38 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
84 Participants161 Participants77 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
87 Participants156 Participants69 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
36 Participants87 Participants51 Participants
Smoking History
Currently smoke
No
114 Participants221 Participants107 Participants
Smoking History
Currently smoke
Prefer not to respond
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Smoking History
Currently smoke
Yes
8 Participants21 Participants13 Participants
Smoking History
Ever smoked cigarettes
No
49 Participants107 Participants58 Participants
Smoking History
Ever smoked cigarettes
Prefer not to respond
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Smoking History
Ever smoked cigarettes
Yes
73 Participants135 Participants62 Participants
Total family income
$20,000 to $34,999
15 Participants35 Participants20 Participants
Total family income
$35,000 to $49,999
14 Participants32 Participants18 Participants
Total family income
$50,000 to $74,999
22 Participants39 Participants17 Participants
Total family income
$75,000 to $99,999
14 Participants27 Participants13 Participants
Total family income
Don't know
13 Participants22 Participants9 Participants
Total family income
Greater than or equal to $100,000
16 Participants34 Participants18 Participants
Total family income
Less than or equal to $19,999
17 Participants29 Participants12 Participants
Total family income
Prefer not to respond
12 Participants25 Participants13 Participants
Type of medical insurance
Great than 2 types
6 Participants8 Participants2 Participants
Type of medical insurance
Medicaid
3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Type of medical insurance
Medicaid/Medicare
11 Participants19 Participants8 Participants
Type of medical insurance
Medicaid/Private
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Type of medical insurance
Medicaid/Tricare
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Type of medical insurance
Medicare
13 Participants25 Participants12 Participants
Type of medical insurance
Medicare/Other
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Type of medical insurance
Medicare/Private
52 Participants107 Participants55 Participants
Type of medical insurance
Medicare/Tricare
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Type of medical insurance
None
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Type of medical insurance
Other
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Type of medical insurance
Private
32 Participants68 Participants36 Participants
Type of medical insurance
Private/Other
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Type of medical insurance
Tricare/Private
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Underwent prior electrophysiologic procedure
Underwent a defibrillator insertion
No
115 Participants225 Participants110 Participants
Underwent prior electrophysiologic procedure
Underwent a defibrillator insertion
Yes
8 Participants18 Participants10 Participants
Underwent prior electrophysiologic procedure
Underwent a pacemaker insertion
No
107 Participants207 Participants100 Participants
Underwent prior electrophysiologic procedure
Underwent a pacemaker insertion
Yes
16 Participants36 Participants20 Participants
Underwent prior electrophysiologic procedure
Underwent a pulmonary vein isolation
No
123 Participants243 Participants120 Participants
Underwent prior electrophysiologic procedure
Underwent a pulmonary vein isolation
Yes
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Underwent prior electrophysiologic procedure
Underwent electrical cardioversion
No
91 Participants172 Participants81 Participants
Underwent prior electrophysiologic procedure
Underwent electrical cardioversion
Yes
32 Participants71 Participants39 Participants
Underwent prior electrophysiologic procedure
Underwent medication cardioversion
No
121 Participants239 Participants118 Participants
Underwent prior electrophysiologic procedure
Underwent medication cardioversion
Yes
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Warfarin or Direct-acting oral anticoagulant
Eliquis (Apixaban)
73 Participants154 Participants81 Participants
Warfarin or Direct-acting oral anticoagulant
Pradaxa (Dabigatran)
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Warfarin or Direct-acting oral anticoagulant
Warfarin (also called Coumadin, Jantoven)
19 Participants34 Participants15 Participants
Warfarin or Direct-acting oral anticoagulant
Xarelto (Rivaroxaban)
30 Participants53 Participants23 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 1232 / 120
other
Total, other adverse events
18 / 12326 / 120
serious
Total, serious adverse events
30 / 12326 / 120

Outcome results

Primary

Proportion of Days Covered

Proportion of Days Covered (PDC), obtained from collection of electronic prescription and pharmacy fill data, and defined as the proportion of availability of medication for the period of interest, here the period from the date of the baseline to the 12-month examination. PDC range is 0 to 1.00 with higher values indicating greater proportion of days with medication over the 12-month period of study participation as indicated by pharmacy records.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Pharmacy data were not available for 8 intervention and 7 usual care participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
InterventionProportion of Days Covered1.0 Proportion of days covered
Usual CareProportion of Days Covered0.9 Proportion of days covered
Comparison: Proportion of days covered assessed as a continuous measure (range 0-1) at 12 months between study arms adjusted for trial stratification factors (type of anticoagulant treatment). We determined that a sample size of 120 in the intervention group and 120 in the control group enables us to detect a minimum difference in PDC as small as 12.6% with 90% power. Power calculations assume use of 2-sided tests with 0.05 significance level.p-value: 0.22t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT)

The Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of life (AFEQT) is a widely used measure of atrial fibrillation-specific health-related quality of life. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating superior health-related quality of life in AF.

Time frame: 4, 8 and 12 months

Population: Intervention arm:~4-month: n=111 (11 withdrawals \[w/d\]; 1 missed visit) 8-month: n=109 (total 13 w/d; 1 missed visit) 12-month: n=108 (total 13 w/d; 2 missed visit)~Usual Care:~4-month: n=107 (10 w/d; 3 missed visit) 8-month: n=107 (total 10 w/d; 3 missed visit) 12-month: n=103 (total 12 w/d; 5 missed visit)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
InterventionAtrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT)12 Month76.9 score on a scale
InterventionAtrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT)4 Month77.8 score on a scale
InterventionAtrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT)8 Month79.6 score on a scale
Usual CareAtrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT)4 Month79.6 score on a scale
Usual CareAtrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT)8 Month77.8 score on a scale
Usual CareAtrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT)12 Month82.4 score on a scale
Secondary

Days of Hospitalization

The number of days of hospitalization ascertained from extraction of electronic health records through the 12 months of study duration. Total days spent in hospital over 12 months were summarized as a single count for each participant.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Intervention:~n=112 (11 withdrawals prior to month-4 visit, date of first collection of this outcome)~Usual care n=110 (10 withdrawals prior to month-4 visit, date of first collection of this outcome)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
InterventionDays of Hospitalization292 days
Usual CareDays of Hospitalization638 days
Secondary

Emergency Room (ER) Visits and Hospitalizations

The number of emergency room visits and hospitalizations quantified at 12 months.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Intervention:~n=112 (11 withdrawals prior to month-4 visit, date of first collection of this outcome)~Usual care n=110 (10 withdrawals prior to month-4 visit, date of first collection of this outcome)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
InterventionEmergency Room (ER) Visits and Hospitalizations71 ER visits or hospitalization events
Usual CareEmergency Room (ER) Visits and Hospitalizations163 ER visits or hospitalization events
Secondary

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29

Measure Description: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29 assesses 7 domains (physical function; depression and sadness; pain interference; satisfaction with participation in social roles and activities; fatigue; anxiety and fear; sleep disturbance), 4 questions each, and Pain Intensity with a single item. The 7 domain scores are transformed using a T-score with a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10, in a referent population. Higher scores indicate worse health for the depression, pain, fatigue, anxiety/sleep domains, while higher scores indicate better health for the physical function and satisfaction domains. The single Pain Intensity item is scored 0 (No pain) to 10 (Worst imaginable pain) in the past 7 days. Further details on PROMIS scoring are available at https://www.healthmeasures.net/images/PROMIS/manuals/PROMIS\_Adult\_Profile\_Scoring\_Manual.pdf.

Time frame: 4, 8, and 12 months

Population: Intervention arm:~4-month: n=111 (11 withdrawals \[w/d\]; 1 missed visit) 8-month: n=109 (total 13 w/d; 1 missed visit) 12-month: n=108 (total 13 w/d; 2 missed visit)~Usual Care:~4-month: n=107 (10 w/d; 3 missed visit) 8-month: n=107 (total 10 w/d; 3 missed visit) 12-month: n=103 (total 12 w/d; 5 missed visit)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
InterventionPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Depression: 4 month41.0 Score on a scale
InterventionPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Physical Function: 8 month41.9 Score on a scale
InterventionPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Physical Function: 12 month41.9 Score on a scale
InterventionPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Anxiety: 4 month40.3 Score on a scale
InterventionPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Anxiety: 8 month40.3 Score on a scale
InterventionPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Anxiety: 12 month40.3 Score on a scale
InterventionPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Physical Function: 4 month41.9 Score on a scale
InterventionPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Depression:8 month41.0 Score on a scale
InterventionPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Depression: 12 month41.0 Score on a scale
InterventionPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Fatigue: 4 month51.0 Score on a scale
InterventionPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Fatigue: 8 month51.0 Score on a scale
InterventionPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Fatigue: 12 month48.6 Score on a scale
InterventionPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Sleep Disturbance: 4 month48.4 Score on a scale
InterventionPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Sleep Disturbance: 8 month48.4 Score on a scale
InterventionPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Sleep Disturbance: 12 month48.4 Score on a scale
InterventionPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities: 4 month51.9 Score on a scale
InterventionPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities: 8 month51.9 Score on a scale
InterventionPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities: 12 month51.0 Score on a scale
InterventionPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Pain Interference: 4 month57.1 Score on a scale
InterventionPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Pain Interference: 8 month55.6 Score on a scale
InterventionPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Pain Interference: 12 month55.6 Score on a scale
InterventionPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Pain Intensity (Global 07): 4 month4 Score on a scale
InterventionPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Pain Intensity (Global 07): 8 month3 Score on a scale
InterventionPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Pain Intensity (Global 07): 12 month4 Score on a scale
Usual CarePatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Pain Intensity (Global 07): 8 month3 Score on a scale
Usual CarePatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Physical Function: 4 month41.9 Score on a scale
Usual CarePatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Sleep Disturbance: 4 month50.5 Score on a scale
Usual CarePatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Physical Function: 8 month41.9 Score on a scale
Usual CarePatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Pain Interference: 4 month55.6 Score on a scale
Usual CarePatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Physical Function: 12 month43.5 Score on a scale
Usual CarePatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Sleep Disturbance: 8 month50.5 Score on a scale
Usual CarePatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Anxiety: 4 month48.0 Score on a scale
Usual CarePatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Pain Intensity (Global 07): 4 month3 Score on a scale
Usual CarePatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Anxiety: 8 month48.0 Score on a scale
Usual CarePatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Sleep Disturbance: 12 month50.5 Score on a scale
Usual CarePatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Anxiety: 12 month40.3 Score on a scale
Usual CarePatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Pain Interference: 8 month55.6 Score on a scale
Usual CarePatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Depression: 4 month41.0 Score on a scale
Usual CarePatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities: 4 month51.9 Score on a scale
Usual CarePatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Depression:8 month41.0 Score on a scale
Usual CarePatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Pain Intensity (Global 07): 12 month3 Score on a scale
Usual CarePatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Depression: 12 month41.0 Score on a scale
Usual CarePatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities: 8 month51.9 Score on a scale
Usual CarePatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Fatigue: 4 month53.1 Score on a scale
Usual CarePatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Pain Interference: 12 month55.6 Score on a scale
Usual CarePatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Fatigue: 8 month51.0 Score on a scale
Usual CarePatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities: 12 month51.9 Score on a scale
Usual CarePatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29Fatigue: 12 month48.6 Score on a scale
Secondary

Self-reported Non-adherence

Self-reported non-adherence to oral anticoagulation with a 3-item instrument with each item scored 1-5 and lower scores indicating adherence. Scores dichotomized to classify participants as adherent (indicated by reporting 1 on all 3 items) or as non-adherent (indicated by reporting ≥ 2 on any of the 3 items).

Time frame: 4, 8 and 12 months

Population: Intervention 4-month: n=111 (11 withdrawals \[w/d\]; 1 missed visit) 8-month: n=109 (total 13 w/d; 1 missed visit) 12-month: n= 108 (total 13 w/d; 2 missed the visit)~Usual care 4-months: n=107 (10 w/d; 3 missed visit) 8 months: n=107 (total 10 w/d; 3 missed visit) 12-months: n=103 (total 12 w/d; 5 missed visit)

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionSelf-reported Non-adherence4 MonthAdherent99 Participants
InterventionSelf-reported Non-adherence4 MonthNon-adherent12 Participants
InterventionSelf-reported Non-adherence8 MonthAdherent99 Participants
InterventionSelf-reported Non-adherence8 MonthNon-adherent10 Participants
InterventionSelf-reported Non-adherence12 MonthAdherent94 Participants
InterventionSelf-reported Non-adherence12 MonthNon-adherent14 Participants
Usual CareSelf-reported Non-adherence12 MonthAdherent85 Participants
Usual CareSelf-reported Non-adherence4 MonthAdherent87 Participants
Usual CareSelf-reported Non-adherence8 MonthNon-adherent20 Participants
Usual CareSelf-reported Non-adherence4 MonthNon-adherent20 Participants
Usual CareSelf-reported Non-adherence12 MonthNon-adherent18 Participants
Usual CareSelf-reported Non-adherence8 MonthAdherent87 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026