Childhood Cancer Survivors
Conditions
Brief summary
The goal of this project is to evaluate the feasibility of the Managing Your Health online self-management skills+peer mentoring intervention that focuses on overcoming survivor barriers to self-management of their survivorship care. We will conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the intervention versus usual care with adolescent and young adult survivors of childhood cancer ages 18-25 years. Participants will complete survey measures at baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months after baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months after baseline), and Time 4 (about 12 months after baseline).
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. Evaluate the feasibility of the online self-management+peer mentoring program in a pilot RCT. II. Assess preliminary efficacy of the intervention.
Interventions
The online educational component consists of 5 self-management educational modules: (1) Understanding Your Survivorship Care Plan; (2) Managing Your Healthcare; (3) Family and Significant Other Involvement in Your Healthcare; (4) Emotions about Your Health and Follow-Up Care; (5) Staying Healthy. Participants will be matched with a peer mentor and complete a total of six calls. The first call is to build a rapport and identify the participant's self-management strengths, weaknesses, and goals. The next five calls align with the topic of each module, which the mentee is expected to complete prior to their scheduled call.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Young Adult Survivors: * age 18-25; * at least 2 years from treatment for any pediatric cancer diagnosed at age 0-19; * low self-reported responsibility for healthcare as indicated by reporting parent is primarily responsible for healthcare or low score (1 or 2) on two or more items from Readiness for Transition Questionnaire - Survivor Version. Peer Mentor: * age 21-29; * at least 2 years from treatment for any pediatric cancer diagnosed at age 0-19; * self-reported primary responsibility for healthcare and complete readiness to assume responsibility or high scores (3 or 4) on all items from Readiness for Transition Questionnaire - Survivor Version.
Exclusion criteria
• Documented or self-reported cognitive delay to prevent self-management of healthcare.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptance of Peer Mentors (Young Adult Survivors and Peer Mentors): Questionnaire | Time 2, about 2 months since baseline | Acceptance will be evaluated by young adult survivors' and peer mentors' report on perceived alliance with each other using the Working Alliance Inventory - Short Form Revised (Hatcher & Gillaspy, 2006), a validated measure of the quality and strength of the relationship. Items are rated on a 5-point scale. The measure yields 3 subscales summary scores that can range from 5 to 20, with higher scores indicating more positive relationships. Sum scores on each sub-scale with be calculated: Bond, Goal, and Task. |
| Feasibility Measure: Enrollment (Young Adult Survivors) - Number of Eligible Patients Consented and Completing Baseline | Baseline | Determined by number of eligible patients consented and completing baseline. Hypothesis: \>50% of eligible will consent and complete the baseline. |
| Feasibility Measure: Retention in Study (Young Adult Survivors): Percent of Consented Patients Who Are Retained in the Study and Complete Time 3 Follow-up | Time 3 at about 5 months since Baseline. | Retention in study (Young Adult Survivors). Determined by the percent of consented patients who are retained in the study and complete Time 3 follow-up. Hypothesis: \>80%. |
| Feasibility: Completion of the Intervention (Young Adult Survivors): Percentage | Time 2, about 2 months since baseline. | Mean percent completed per task: (a) On-line self-management educational modules and (b) Weekly calls with peer mentor. |
| Feasibility: Satisfaction With Intervention (Young Adult Survivors): Mean | Time 2, about 2 months since baseline. | Five items assess satisfaction with each aspect of the intervention: a. Overall program satisfaction; b. Content of online modules; c. Discussions with peer mentor; d. Frequency of calls with peer mentor; and e. Duration of program. First 3 items (a, b and c) were evaluated using a 5-point scale, (Minimum 1, Maximum 5) with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction. Item c evaluated on a scale from 1 not frequent enough to 3 too frequent. Item d uses a 1 way too short to 5 way too long scale. The sample mean will be examined. |
| Feasibility: Utility of the Online Self-Management Modules (Young Adult Survivors): Questionnaire | Time 2, about 2 months since baseline. | The Utility Questionnaire is an 11-item scale that measures perceived ease of use and convenience of the online program using a 5-point scale, (minimum 1, maximum 5) with higher scores indicating greater perceived utility. An overall mean of all items will be calculated. |
| Feasibility: Impact of the Online Self-Management Modules (Young Adult Survivors): Questionnaire | Time 2, about 2 months since baseline. | The Impact Questionnaire is a 13-item scale that measures perceived effectiveness of the online program using a 5-point scale, (minimum 1, and maximum 5) with higher scores indicating greater perceived effectiveness. An overall mean of all items will be calculated. |
| Feasibility: Adherence Barriers to the Online Self-Management Modules (Young Adult Survivors): Questionnaire | Time 2, about 2 months since baseline. | The Adherence Barriers Questionnaire is a 6-item scale that measures perceived barriers to using the online program using a 5-point scale, (minimum 1 and maximum 5) with higher scores indicating greater perceived barriers. An overall mean of all items will be calculated. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Self-efficacy for Communicating With Family About Healthcare (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months since baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline), Time 4 (about 12 months since baseline). | This scale measures confidence in communicating with family about healthcare concerns using a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating greater confidence. A mean score is calculated (range from 1-5). |
| Self-efficacy for Managing Late Effects (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months since baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline), Time 4 (about 12 months since baseline). | This scale consists of three items measuring confidence in managing late effects using a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating higher confidence. A mean score is calculated (range 1-5). |
| Health Insurance Self-efficacy (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months since baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline), Time 4 (about 12 months since baseline). | This scale consists of seven items measuring confidence in managing health insurance using a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating higher confidence. A mean score is calculated (range 1-5). |
| Self-efficacy for Managing Emotions (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months since baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline) | The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions - Managing Emotions-Short Form is an 8-item measure of confidence in managing emotions. A mean score will be calculated (range 1-5). Higher scores indicate higher confidence in managing emotions. |
| Emotional Support (Young Adult Survivors) | Baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months since baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline), Time 4 (about 12 months since baseline). | The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Emotional Support-Short Form is a 4-item measure of perceived emotional support. A mean score will be calculated (range 1-5), with higher scores indicative of having better perceived emotional support. |
| Informational Support (Young Adult Survivors) | Baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months since baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline), Time 4 (about 12 months since baseline). | The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Informational Support-Short Form is a 4-item measure of perceived availability of helpful information or advice. A mean score will be calculated (range 1-5), with higher scores indicating higher perceived informational support. |
| Survivorship Care Attitudes (Young Adult Survivors) | Baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months since baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline), Time 4 (about 12 months since baseline). | This scale consists of four items measuring attitudes toward survivorship care using a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating more positive attitudes. A mean score is calculated (range 1-5). |
| Self-efficacy for Survivorship Care Planning (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months since baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline), Time 4 (about 12 months since baseline). | This scale consists of three items measuring confidence in survivorship care planning using a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating higher confidence. A mean score is calculated (range 1-5). |
| Healthcare Responsibility (Young Adult Survivors) | Baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months since baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline), Time 4 (about 12 months since baseline). | The Readiness for Transition Questionnaire - Survivor Version (RTQ) assesses the degree to which survivors are responsible for 10 healthcare behaviors, including knowing their survivorship care plan, scheduling annual visits, scheduling specialist appointments, taking and filling medications (if prescribed), explaining medical history to others, knowing insurance coverage, attending appointments, communicating with providers, and calling providers, on a 4-point scale, with higher scores indicating higher levels of responsibility. The RTQ yields a total mean score for responsibility. It also has one item evaluating overall readiness to assume complete responsibility for healthcare with response options of Not at all ready, somewhat ready, mostly ready, or completely ready. The sample mean for the Total Responsibility score and overall readiness item will be calculated (range 1-4) |
| Knowledge (Young Adult Survivors) | Baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months since baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline) | The knowledge subscale from the Transition Readiness Inventory (TRI) measures knowledge of survivorship care using a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge. A mean score will be calculated (range 1-5). |
| Self-Management Skills/Self-Efficacy (Young Adult Survivors) | Baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months since baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline) | The Skills/Self-Efficacy sub-scale from the Transition Readiness Inventory (TRI) measures self-management skills and self-efficacy for survivorship care using a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating greater skills/efficacy. A mean score will be calculated (range 1-5). |
| Self-Management Goals (Young Adult Survivors) | Baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months since baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline) | The Goals subscale from the Transition Readiness Inventory (TRI) measures self-management goals for survivorship care using a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating greater goals. A mean score will be calculated (range 1-5). |
| Self-Management Beliefs (Young Adult Survivors) | Baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months since baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline) | The Beliefs/Expectations sub-scale from the Transition Readiness Inventory (TRI) measures self-management beliefs for survivorship care using a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating more positive beliefs. A mean score will be calculated (range 1-5). |
| Self-efficacy for Communicating With Physician (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months since baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline), Time 4 (about 12 months since baseline). | This single item measures confidence in communicating with a physician about health concerns using a 10-point scale, with higher scores indicating greater confidence. Range is from 1-10. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Baseline, Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline), Time 4 (about 12 months since baseline). | As an exploratory outcome, participants will report on receipt of the following healthcare (if applicable): Survivorship Care Plan, annual survivorship visit, echocardiogram within last 5 years, mammogram ever (females only), skin cancer screening ever, primary care visit in last 2 years, dental visit in the last year, annual flu vaccine up-to-date, and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine ever. Each item will be treated individually. The number of survivors reporting receipt of each healthcare service will be counted. Yes indicates receipt within time frame indicated for the outcome; No indicates either not received or not due per self-report. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| RCT Intervention The intervention consists of (1) online self-management educational modules and (2) weekly peer mentor calls to facilitate engagement with the modules and offer specialized support over approximately six weeks.
Managing Your Health: Self-Management + Peer Mentoring: The online educational component consists of 5 self-management educational modules:
(1) Understanding Your Survivorship Care Plan; (2) Managing Your Healthcare; (3) Family and Significant Other Involvement in Your Healthcare; (4) Emotions about Your Health and Follow-Up Care; (5) Staying Healthy.
Participants will be matched with a peer mentor and complete a total of six calls. The first call is to build a rapport and identify the participant's self-management strengths, weaknesses, and goals. The next five calls align with the topic of each module, which the mentee is expected to complete prior to their scheduled call. | 25 |
| RCT Usual Care Participants receive usual care. | 25 |
| Mentors Peer Mentors were recruited and matched 1:1 with each participant randomized to RCT Intervention to facilitate engagement with the online modules and offer specialized support. | 10 |
| Total | 60 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | RCT Intervention | RCT Usual Care | Mentors | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 25 Participants | 25 Participants | 10 Participants | 60 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 21.12 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.03 | 21.60 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.89 | 26.50 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.46 | 23.07 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.13 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 4 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 21 Participants | 24 Participants | 10 Participants | 55 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 3 Participants | 5 Participants | 1 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 5 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 16 Participants | 14 Participants | 9 Participants | 39 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 25 participants | 25 participants | 10 participants | 60 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 11 Participants | 9 Participants | 5 Participants | 25 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 14 Participants | 16 Participants | 5 Participants | 35 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 25 | 0 / 25 | 0 / 10 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 25 | 0 / 25 | 0 / 10 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 25 | 0 / 25 | 0 / 10 |
Outcome results
Acceptance of Peer Mentors (Young Adult Survivors and Peer Mentors): Questionnaire
Acceptance will be evaluated by young adult survivors' and peer mentors' report on perceived alliance with each other using the Working Alliance Inventory - Short Form Revised (Hatcher & Gillaspy, 2006), a validated measure of the quality and strength of the relationship. Items are rated on a 5-point scale. The measure yields 3 subscales summary scores that can range from 5 to 20, with higher scores indicating more positive relationships. Sum scores on each sub-scale with be calculated: Bond, Goal, and Task.
Time frame: Time 2, about 2 months since baseline
Population: Peer mentors and young adult survivors in RCT Intervention group who completed the tested intervention (i.e., n=22). Please note, while total number of mentors on study was n=10, total reports by mentors for this measure was n=22 (some mentors were assigned to mentor more than one young adult survivor assigned to RCT intervention group.)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Acceptance of Peer Mentors (Young Adult Survivors and Peer Mentors): Questionnaire | Bond | 18.41 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.92 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Acceptance of Peer Mentors (Young Adult Survivors and Peer Mentors): Questionnaire | Goal | 17.68 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.28 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Acceptance of Peer Mentors (Young Adult Survivors and Peer Mentors): Questionnaire | Task | 18.14 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.01 |
| Usual Care | Acceptance of Peer Mentors (Young Adult Survivors and Peer Mentors): Questionnaire | Bond | 19.55 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.14 |
| Usual Care | Acceptance of Peer Mentors (Young Adult Survivors and Peer Mentors): Questionnaire | Goal | 13.45 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.71 |
| Usual Care | Acceptance of Peer Mentors (Young Adult Survivors and Peer Mentors): Questionnaire | Task | 13.09 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.66 |
Feasibility: Adherence Barriers to the Online Self-Management Modules (Young Adult Survivors): Questionnaire
The Adherence Barriers Questionnaire is a 6-item scale that measures perceived barriers to using the online program using a 5-point scale, (minimum 1 and maximum 5) with higher scores indicating greater perceived barriers. An overall mean of all items will be calculated.
Time frame: Time 2, about 2 months since baseline.
Population: Data available and reported only for participants who were assigned to this group and completed the tested intervention, i.e., n=22. Total of three participants assigned to this group, withdrew from the study, without completing the tested intervention.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Feasibility: Adherence Barriers to the Online Self-Management Modules (Young Adult Survivors): Questionnaire | 1.17 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.24 |
Feasibility: Completion of the Intervention (Young Adult Survivors): Percentage
Mean percent completed per task: (a) On-line self-management educational modules and (b) Weekly calls with peer mentor.
Time frame: Time 2, about 2 months since baseline.
Population: Data available and reported only for participants who were assigned to this group and completed the tested intervention, i.e., n=22. Total of three participants assigned to this group, withdrew from the study, without completing the tested intervention.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Feasibility: Completion of the Intervention (Young Adult Survivors): Percentage | On-line self-management educational modules | 95.72 percent completed |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Feasibility: Completion of the Intervention (Young Adult Survivors): Percentage | Weekly calls with peer mentor | 97.72 percent completed |
Feasibility: Impact of the Online Self-Management Modules (Young Adult Survivors): Questionnaire
The Impact Questionnaire is a 13-item scale that measures perceived effectiveness of the online program using a 5-point scale, (minimum 1, and maximum 5) with higher scores indicating greater perceived effectiveness. An overall mean of all items will be calculated.
Time frame: Time 2, about 2 months since baseline.
Population: Data available and reported only for participants who were assigned to this group and completed the tested intervention, i.e., n=22. Total of three participants assigned to this group, withdrew from the study, without completing the tested intervention.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Feasibility: Impact of the Online Self-Management Modules (Young Adult Survivors): Questionnaire | 4.29 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.48 |
Feasibility Measure: Enrollment (Young Adult Survivors) - Number of Eligible Patients Consented and Completing Baseline
Determined by number of eligible patients consented and completing baseline. Hypothesis: \>50% of eligible will consent and complete the baseline.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: All potentially eligible participants identified by the New Jersey State Cancer Registry (NJSCR) and approached at the local Long-Term Information Treatment Evaluation (LITE) program by study staff.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Feasibility Measure: Enrollment (Young Adult Survivors) - Number of Eligible Patients Consented and Completing Baseline | Enrolled | 50 Participants |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Feasibility Measure: Enrollment (Young Adult Survivors) - Number of Eligible Patients Consented and Completing Baseline | Not Interested | 29 Participants |
Feasibility Measure: Retention in Study (Young Adult Survivors): Percent of Consented Patients Who Are Retained in the Study and Complete Time 3 Follow-up
Retention in study (Young Adult Survivors). Determined by the percent of consented patients who are retained in the study and complete Time 3 follow-up. Hypothesis: \>80%.
Time frame: Time 3 at about 5 months since Baseline.
Population: Young Adult Survivors who enrolled on study, i.e., consented and completed baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Feasibility Measure: Retention in Study (Young Adult Survivors): Percent of Consented Patients Who Are Retained in the Study and Complete Time 3 Follow-up | 22 Participants |
| Usual Care | Feasibility Measure: Retention in Study (Young Adult Survivors): Percent of Consented Patients Who Are Retained in the Study and Complete Time 3 Follow-up | 25 Participants |
Feasibility: Satisfaction With Intervention (Young Adult Survivors): Mean
Five items assess satisfaction with each aspect of the intervention: a. Overall program satisfaction; b. Content of online modules; c. Discussions with peer mentor; d. Frequency of calls with peer mentor; and e. Duration of program. First 3 items (a, b and c) were evaluated using a 5-point scale, (Minimum 1, Maximum 5) with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction. Item c evaluated on a scale from 1 not frequent enough to 3 too frequent. Item d uses a 1 way too short to 5 way too long scale. The sample mean will be examined.
Time frame: Time 2, about 2 months since baseline.
Population: Data available and reported only for participants who were assigned to this group and completed the tested intervention, i.e., n=22. Total of three participants assigned to this group, withdrew from the study, without completing the tested intervention.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Feasibility: Satisfaction With Intervention (Young Adult Survivors): Mean | a. Satisfaction w/ Program overall [Scale 1-5] | 4.64 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.49 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Feasibility: Satisfaction With Intervention (Young Adult Survivors): Mean | b. Satisfaction w/ Content of online modules [Scale 1-5] | 4.41 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.59 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Feasibility: Satisfaction With Intervention (Young Adult Survivors): Mean | c. Satisfaction w/ Discussions with peer mentor [Scale 1-5] | 4.64 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.49 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Feasibility: Satisfaction With Intervention (Young Adult Survivors): Mean | d. Satisfaction w/ Frequency of calls with peer mentor [Scale 1-3; 2=Just right] | 2.00 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.31 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Feasibility: Satisfaction With Intervention (Young Adult Survivors): Mean | e. Satisfaction w/ Duration of program [Scale 1-5; 3= Just right | 2.86 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.47 |
Feasibility: Utility of the Online Self-Management Modules (Young Adult Survivors): Questionnaire
The Utility Questionnaire is an 11-item scale that measures perceived ease of use and convenience of the online program using a 5-point scale, (minimum 1, maximum 5) with higher scores indicating greater perceived utility. An overall mean of all items will be calculated.
Time frame: Time 2, about 2 months since baseline.
Population: Data available and reported only for participants who were assigned to this group and completed the tested intervention, i.e., n=22. Total of three participants assigned to this group, withdrew from the study, without completing the tested intervention.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Feasibility: Utility of the Online Self-Management Modules (Young Adult Survivors): Questionnaire | 4.35 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.54 |
Emotional Support (Young Adult Survivors)
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Emotional Support-Short Form is a 4-item measure of perceived emotional support. A mean score will be calculated (range 1-5), with higher scores indicative of having better perceived emotional support.
Time frame: Baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months since baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline), Time 4 (about 12 months since baseline).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Emotional Support (Young Adult Survivors) | Baseline | 4.18 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.98 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Emotional Support (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 2 | 4.36 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.04 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Emotional Support (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 3 | 4.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.09 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Emotional Support (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 4 | 4.42 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.75 |
| Usual Care | Emotional Support (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 4 | 4.57 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.63 |
| Usual Care | Emotional Support (Young Adult Survivors) | Baseline | 4.47 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.77 |
| Usual Care | Emotional Support (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 3 | 4.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.68 |
| Usual Care | Emotional Support (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 2 | 4.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.76 |
Healthcare Responsibility (Young Adult Survivors)
The Readiness for Transition Questionnaire - Survivor Version (RTQ) assesses the degree to which survivors are responsible for 10 healthcare behaviors, including knowing their survivorship care plan, scheduling annual visits, scheduling specialist appointments, taking and filling medications (if prescribed), explaining medical history to others, knowing insurance coverage, attending appointments, communicating with providers, and calling providers, on a 4-point scale, with higher scores indicating higher levels of responsibility. The RTQ yields a total mean score for responsibility. It also has one item evaluating overall readiness to assume complete responsibility for healthcare with response options of Not at all ready, somewhat ready, mostly ready, or completely ready. The sample mean for the Total Responsibility score and overall readiness item will be calculated (range 1-4)
Time frame: Baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months since baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline), Time 4 (about 12 months since baseline).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Responsibility (Young Adult Survivors) | Baseline RTQ Total | 2.73 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.63 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Responsibility (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 2 RTQ Total | 3.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.67 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Responsibility (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 3 RTQ Total | 3.02 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.72 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Responsibility (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 4 RTQ Total | 3.16 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.64 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Responsibility (Young Adult Survivors) | Baseline RTQ Overall readiness | 2.36 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.76 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Responsibility (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 2 RTQ Overall readiness | 2.64 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.85 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Responsibility (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 3 RTQ Overall readiness | 2.86 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.77 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Responsibility (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 4 RTQ Overall readiness | 3.14 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.79 |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Responsibility (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 4 RTQ Overall readiness | 3.04 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.95 |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Responsibility (Young Adult Survivors) | Baseline RTQ Total | 2.83 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.54 |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Responsibility (Young Adult Survivors) | Baseline RTQ Overall readiness | 2.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.96 |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Responsibility (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 2 RTQ Total | 3.08 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.49 |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Responsibility (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 3 RTQ Overall readiness | 2.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.91 |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Responsibility (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 3 RTQ Total | 3.07 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.64 |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Responsibility (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 2 RTQ Overall readiness | 2.76 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.97 |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Responsibility (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 4 RTQ Total | 3.23 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.63 |
Health Insurance Self-efficacy (Young Adult Survivors): Scale
This scale consists of seven items measuring confidence in managing health insurance using a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating higher confidence. A mean score is calculated (range 1-5).
Time frame: Baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months since baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline), Time 4 (about 12 months since baseline).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Health Insurance Self-efficacy (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Baseline | 2.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.88 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Health Insurance Self-efficacy (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 2 | 3.06 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.25 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Health Insurance Self-efficacy (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 3 | 3.45 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.19 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Health Insurance Self-efficacy (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 4 | 3.36 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.84 |
| Usual Care | Health Insurance Self-efficacy (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 4 | 3.43 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.17 |
| Usual Care | Health Insurance Self-efficacy (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Baseline | 2.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.22 |
| Usual Care | Health Insurance Self-efficacy (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 3 | 3.55 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.13 |
| Usual Care | Health Insurance Self-efficacy (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 2 | 3.01 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.18 |
Informational Support (Young Adult Survivors)
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Informational Support-Short Form is a 4-item measure of perceived availability of helpful information or advice. A mean score will be calculated (range 1-5), with higher scores indicating higher perceived informational support.
Time frame: Baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months since baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline), Time 4 (about 12 months since baseline).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Informational Support (Young Adult Survivors) | Baseline | 3.99 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.94 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Informational Support (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 2 | 4.41 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.97 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Informational Support (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 4 | 4.31 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.71 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Informational Support (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 3 | 4.23 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.05 |
| Usual Care | Informational Support (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 4 | 4.29 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.87 |
| Usual Care | Informational Support (Young Adult Survivors) | Baseline | 4.35 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.68 |
| Usual Care | Informational Support (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 2 | 4.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.74 |
| Usual Care | Informational Support (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 3 | 4.43 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.71 |
Knowledge (Young Adult Survivors)
The knowledge subscale from the Transition Readiness Inventory (TRI) measures knowledge of survivorship care using a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge. A mean score will be calculated (range 1-5).
Time frame: Baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months since baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Knowledge (Young Adult Survivors) | Baseline | 3.44 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.71 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Knowledge (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 2 | 4.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.67 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Knowledge (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 3 | 4.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Usual Care | Knowledge (Young Adult Survivors) | Baseline | 3.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.76 |
| Usual Care | Knowledge (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 2 | 4.13 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.68 |
| Usual Care | Knowledge (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 3 | 4.45 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.77 |
Self-efficacy for Communicating With Family About Healthcare (Young Adult Survivors): Scale
This scale measures confidence in communicating with family about healthcare concerns using a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating greater confidence. A mean score is calculated (range from 1-5).
Time frame: Baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months since baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline), Time 4 (about 12 months since baseline).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Self-efficacy for Communicating With Family About Healthcare (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 3 | 3.91 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.23 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Self-efficacy for Communicating With Family About Healthcare (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Baseline | 3.49 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.04 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Self-efficacy for Communicating With Family About Healthcare (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 4 | 4.29 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.89 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Self-efficacy for Communicating With Family About Healthcare (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 2 | 4.08 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.03 |
| Usual Care | Self-efficacy for Communicating With Family About Healthcare (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 4 | 4.19 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.92 |
| Usual Care | Self-efficacy for Communicating With Family About Healthcare (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Baseline | 3.96 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.03 |
| Usual Care | Self-efficacy for Communicating With Family About Healthcare (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 3 | 4.36 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.03 |
| Usual Care | Self-efficacy for Communicating With Family About Healthcare (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 2 | 4.09 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.15 |
Self-efficacy for Communicating With Physician (Young Adult Survivors): Scale
This single item measures confidence in communicating with a physician about health concerns using a 10-point scale, with higher scores indicating greater confidence. Range is from 1-10.
Time frame: Baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months since baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline), Time 4 (about 12 months since baseline).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Self-efficacy for Communicating With Physician (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Baseline | 7.89 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.76 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Self-efficacy for Communicating With Physician (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 2 | 8.74 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Self-efficacy for Communicating With Physician (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 3 | 8.56 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.35 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Self-efficacy for Communicating With Physician (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 4 | 8.67 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.19 |
| Usual Care | Self-efficacy for Communicating With Physician (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 4 | 9.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.27 |
| Usual Care | Self-efficacy for Communicating With Physician (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Baseline | 8.28 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.16 |
| Usual Care | Self-efficacy for Communicating With Physician (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 3 | 8.92 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.88 |
| Usual Care | Self-efficacy for Communicating With Physician (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 2 | 8.82 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.77 |
Self-efficacy for Managing Emotions (Young Adult Survivors): Scale
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions - Managing Emotions-Short Form is an 8-item measure of confidence in managing emotions. A mean score will be calculated (range 1-5). Higher scores indicate higher confidence in managing emotions.
Time frame: Baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months since baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Self-efficacy for Managing Emotions (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Baseline | 3.39 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Self-efficacy for Managing Emotions (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 2 | 3.85 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.94 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Self-efficacy for Managing Emotions (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 3 | 3.97 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.82 |
| Usual Care | Self-efficacy for Managing Emotions (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Baseline | 3.73 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.87 |
| Usual Care | Self-efficacy for Managing Emotions (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 2 | 3.73 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.88 |
| Usual Care | Self-efficacy for Managing Emotions (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 3 | 3.86 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.76 |
Self-efficacy for Managing Late Effects (Young Adult Survivors): Scale
This scale consists of three items measuring confidence in managing late effects using a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating higher confidence. A mean score is calculated (range 1-5).
Time frame: Baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months since baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline), Time 4 (about 12 months since baseline).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Self-efficacy for Managing Late Effects (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Baseline | 2.39 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Self-efficacy for Managing Late Effects (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 2 | 3.43 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.12 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Self-efficacy for Managing Late Effects (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 3 | 3.67 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.97 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Self-efficacy for Managing Late Effects (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 4 | 3.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.87 |
| Usual Care | Self-efficacy for Managing Late Effects (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 4 | 3.54 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.27 |
| Usual Care | Self-efficacy for Managing Late Effects (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Baseline | 3.05 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.35 |
| Usual Care | Self-efficacy for Managing Late Effects (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 3 | 3.65 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.14 |
| Usual Care | Self-efficacy for Managing Late Effects (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 2 | 3.63 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.18 |
Self-efficacy for Survivorship Care Planning (Young Adult Survivors): Scale
This scale consists of three items measuring confidence in survivorship care planning using a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating higher confidence. A mean score is calculated (range 1-5).
Time frame: Baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months since baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline), Time 4 (about 12 months since baseline).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Self-efficacy for Survivorship Care Planning (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Baseline | 2.83 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.21 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Self-efficacy for Survivorship Care Planning (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 2 | 3.89 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.89 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Self-efficacy for Survivorship Care Planning (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 3 | 3.92 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.15 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Self-efficacy for Survivorship Care Planning (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 4 | 4.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.84 |
| Usual Care | Self-efficacy for Survivorship Care Planning (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 4 | 3.96 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.18 |
| Usual Care | Self-efficacy for Survivorship Care Planning (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Baseline | 3.25 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.53 |
| Usual Care | Self-efficacy for Survivorship Care Planning (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 3 | 3.96 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.33 |
| Usual Care | Self-efficacy for Survivorship Care Planning (Young Adult Survivors): Scale | Time 2 | 3.65 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.28 |
Self-Management Beliefs (Young Adult Survivors)
The Beliefs/Expectations sub-scale from the Transition Readiness Inventory (TRI) measures self-management beliefs for survivorship care using a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating more positive beliefs. A mean score will be calculated (range 1-5).
Time frame: Baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months since baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Self-Management Beliefs (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 3 | 4.21 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.55 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Self-Management Beliefs (Young Adult Survivors) | Baseline | 3.59 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.58 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Self-Management Beliefs (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 2 | 4.14 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.45 |
| Usual Care | Self-Management Beliefs (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 2 | 4.06 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.66 |
| Usual Care | Self-Management Beliefs (Young Adult Survivors) | Baseline | 3.95 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.64 |
| Usual Care | Self-Management Beliefs (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 3 | 4.13 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.67 |
Self-Management Goals (Young Adult Survivors)
The Goals subscale from the Transition Readiness Inventory (TRI) measures self-management goals for survivorship care using a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating greater goals. A mean score will be calculated (range 1-5).
Time frame: Baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months since baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Self-Management Goals (Young Adult Survivors) | Baseline | 3.44 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.91 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Self-Management Goals (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 2 | 4.10 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.71 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Self-Management Goals (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 3 | 4.06 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.67 |
| Usual Care | Self-Management Goals (Young Adult Survivors) | Baseline | 3.99 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Usual Care | Self-Management Goals (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 2 | 4.30 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.72 |
| Usual Care | Self-Management Goals (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 3 | 4.30 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.89 |
Self-Management Skills/Self-Efficacy (Young Adult Survivors)
The Skills/Self-Efficacy sub-scale from the Transition Readiness Inventory (TRI) measures self-management skills and self-efficacy for survivorship care using a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating greater skills/efficacy. A mean score will be calculated (range 1-5).
Time frame: Baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months since baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Self-Management Skills/Self-Efficacy (Young Adult Survivors) | Baseline | 3.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.68 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Self-Management Skills/Self-Efficacy (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 2 | 3.72 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.78 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Self-Management Skills/Self-Efficacy (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 3 | 3.84 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.76 |
| Usual Care | Self-Management Skills/Self-Efficacy (Young Adult Survivors) | Baseline | 3.81 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.71 |
| Usual Care | Self-Management Skills/Self-Efficacy (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 2 | 3.92 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.66 |
| Usual Care | Self-Management Skills/Self-Efficacy (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 3 | 4.00 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.77 |
Survivorship Care Attitudes (Young Adult Survivors)
This scale consists of four items measuring attitudes toward survivorship care using a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating more positive attitudes. A mean score is calculated (range 1-5).
Time frame: Baseline, Time 2 (about 2 months since baseline), Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline), Time 4 (about 12 months since baseline).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Survivorship Care Attitudes (Young Adult Survivors) | Baseline | 4.07 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.62 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Survivorship Care Attitudes (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 2 | 4.35 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.66 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Survivorship Care Attitudes (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 3 | 4.43 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.57 |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Survivorship Care Attitudes (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 4 | 4.54 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.41 |
| Usual Care | Survivorship Care Attitudes (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 4 | 4.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.74 |
| Usual Care | Survivorship Care Attitudes (Young Adult Survivors) | Baseline | 3.99 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.76 |
| Usual Care | Survivorship Care Attitudes (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 3 | 4.25 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.73 |
| Usual Care | Survivorship Care Attitudes (Young Adult Survivors) | Time 2 | 4.03 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.93 |
Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors)
As an exploratory outcome, participants will report on receipt of the following healthcare (if applicable): Survivorship Care Plan, annual survivorship visit, echocardiogram within last 5 years, mammogram ever (females only), skin cancer screening ever, primary care visit in last 2 years, dental visit in the last year, annual flu vaccine up-to-date, and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine ever. Each item will be treated individually. The number of survivors reporting receipt of each healthcare service will be counted. Yes indicates receipt within time frame indicated for the outcome; No indicates either not received or not due per self-report.
Time frame: Baseline, Time 3 (about 5 months since baseline), Time 4 (about 12 months since baseline).
Population: Mammogram measure was only administered to females so the sample size for those analyses represent the number of females in each arm.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Survivorship Care Plan-Time 3 : yes | 18 Participants |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Skin cancer screening-Baseline: yes | 8 Participants |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Annual survivorship visit-Time 4: yes | 15 Participants |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Skin cancer screening-Time 3: yes | 6 Participants |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Primary care visit-Baseline: yes | 21 Participants |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Skin cancer screening-Time 4: yes | 8 Participants |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Echocardiogram-Baseline: yes | 19 Participants |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Annual survivorship visit-Time 3: yes | 6 Participants |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Primary care visit-Time 3: yes | 16 Participants |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Echocardiogram-Time 3: yes | 19 Participants |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Primary care visit-Time 4: yes | 19 Participants |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Survivorship Care Plan-Time 4 : yes | 18 Participants |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Dental visit-Baseline: yes | 20 Participants |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Echocardiogram-Time 4: yes | 18 Participants |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Dental visit-Time 3: yes | 20 Participants |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Annual flu vaccine-Baseline | 14 Participants |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Survivorship Care Plan-Baseline : yes | 9 Participants |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Annual flu vaccine-Time 3 | 18 Participants |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Mammogram-Baseline: yes | 1 Participants |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Annual flu vaccine-Time 4 | 15 Participants |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Annual survivorship visit-Baseline: yes | 20 Participants |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine-Baseline: yes | 19 Participants |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Mammogram-Time 3: yes | 1 Participants |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine-Time 3: yes | 19 Participants |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Dental visit-Time 4: yes | 15 Participants |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine-Time4: yes | 20 Participants |
| Randomized Control Trial Participants-Young Adult Survivors | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Mammogram-Time 4: yes | 1 Participants |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine-Time4: yes | 17 Participants |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Dental visit-Time 4: yes | 13 Participants |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Survivorship Care Plan-Baseline : yes | 10 Participants |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Survivorship Care Plan-Time 3 : yes | 15 Participants |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Survivorship Care Plan-Time 4 : yes | 11 Participants |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Annual survivorship visit-Baseline: yes | 16 Participants |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Annual survivorship visit-Time 3: yes | 1 Participants |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Annual survivorship visit-Time 4: yes | 9 Participants |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Echocardiogram-Baseline: yes | 15 Participants |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Echocardiogram-Time 3: yes | 16 Participants |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Echocardiogram-Time 4: yes | 13 Participants |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Mammogram-Baseline: yes | 1 Participants |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Mammogram-Time 3: yes | 1 Participants |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Mammogram-Time 4: yes | 0 Participants |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Skin cancer screening-Baseline: yes | 5 Participants |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Skin cancer screening-Time 3: yes | 7 Participants |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Skin cancer screening-Time 4: yes | 7 Participants |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Primary care visit-Baseline: yes | 24 Participants |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Primary care visit-Time 3: yes | 22 Participants |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Primary care visit-Time 4: yes | 21 Participants |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Dental visit-Baseline: yes | 21 Participants |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Annual flu vaccine-Baseline | 12 Participants |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Annual flu vaccine-Time 3 | 17 Participants |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Annual flu vaccine-Time 4 | 16 Participants |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine-Baseline: yes | 16 Participants |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine-Time 3: yes | 16 Participants |
| Usual Care | Healthcare Utilization (Young Adult Survivors) | Dental visit-Time 3: yes | 17 Participants |