Skip to content

Comparative Study Between Zirconia Crowns and Endocrowns in Pulpotomized Primary Molars

Clinical Evaluation of Endocrowns Versus Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns in Pulpotomized Primary Molars : A Pilot Prospective Clinical Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04073901
Enrollment
20
Registered
2019-08-29
Start date
2018-02-02
Completion date
2019-07-30
Last updated
2020-04-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dentistry, Paediatric

Keywords

Aesthetic, Endo-crowns, primary, molars, pulpotomy, zirconium, crowns

Brief summary

Objectives: The new approach of pediatric esthetic dentistry intended to achieve a healthy beautiful smile rather than achieving only a beautiful smile. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical performance of ceramic Endocrowns and Zirconia crowns for the restoration of pulpotomized primary molars and parental satisfaction toward these crowns. Study design: Randomized clinical trial/split mouth design compared the clinical outcomes of two coronal restorations, on patients with bilateral carious second primary molars restoring one side with Endocrown (IPS e.max Press) and the other side with zirconia crown. Children attended Nahda University; Faculty of Dentistry clinics who need restorations screened for inclusion criteria till 20 patients are recruited (20 teeth for zirconia crown restorations and 20 for Endocrowns restorations). All children fulfilled the inclusion criteria were evaluated for factors including restoration integrity, marginal adaptation, marginal discoloration, oral health and overall clinical success at 3,6,12 months while parental satisfaction at 12 months follow up..

Interventions

Adhesive monoblock restoration for pulpotomized primary molars

Sponsors

Nahda University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

only satiation was blinded

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 7 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. . Free of systemic diseases. 2. Age between 4 and 7 years. 3. Takes no medication on regular basis. 4. Has bilateral lower second primary molar with deep carious lesion, indicated for pulp therapy and crown restoration. (split mouth) 5. Patient and parent compliance.

Exclusion criteria

* 1\. Non-restorable tooth. 2. Tooth near its exfoliation. 3. Tooth with extensive root resorption or periapical pathosis.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Restoration integrityone yearModified USPHS(United States Public Health Service (USPHS), alpha criteria rating system)
marginal adaptationone yearModified USPHS(United States Public Health Service (USPHS), alpha criteria rating system)
marginal discolorationone yearModified USPHS(United States Public Health Service (USPHS), alpha criteria rating system)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
parent satisfactionimmediate after intervention5-point Likert scale Likert scale(0-4)

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026