Skip to content

Microwave Ablation for Uterine Fibroids

Microwave Ablation for Uterine Fibroids

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04073485
Enrollment
6
Registered
2019-08-29
Start date
2019-09-05
Completion date
2023-03-31
Last updated
2023-05-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Uterine Fibroid

Brief summary

This study is aimed to evaluate the clinical safety and effectiveness of Microwave ablation (MWA) in treating patients with uterine fibroid.

Detailed description

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is another form of thermal ablation that has been used for the treatment of uterine fibroids. Although RFA is more invasive when compared to High-Intensity-Focused-Ultrasound (HIFU), the treatment is less limited by the location of the lesions, and the treatment procedure is more time efficient. To further improve the technology of thermal ablation for uterine fibroid, percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) could be a promising option because it allows increased efficiency of energy transmission and reduction in procedure time, and may allow effective treatment of large lesions.

Interventions

PROCEDUREMicrowave ablation

Ultrasonogram is performed to identify the fibroid or adenomyoma. A trocar needle is placed into the lesion under local anesthesia. The MWA procedure is performed using appropriate microwave power and application time are selected to provide sufficient ablation coverage to the target lesion.

Sponsors

Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
30 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Symptomatic fibroids with or without focal adenomyoma 2. Female gender 3. Age between 30 and 50 4. Pre or peri menopausal with FSH less than 40 mIU/ml 5. Negative urine pregnancy test 6. Uterine size less than 22 weeks based on physical exam assessment 7. Dominant intramural fibroid greater than or equal to 3 cm and less than or equal to 10 cm on imaging. 8. Good health other than history of leiomyomas. Chronic medications may be acceptable at the discretion of the research team. 9. Are using abstinence, mechanical (condoms, diaphragms) or sterilization methods of contraception and are willing to continue using them throughout the study. 10. Willing and able to give informed consent. 11. Willing and able to comply with study requirements. 12. Normal menstrual cycle with endometrial pathology excluded

Exclusion criteria

1. History of or current thromboembolic event (deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolus, stroke) 2. Other pelvic pathology as indicated by history or MR imaging such as endometriosis, ovarian tumor, acute or chronic pelvic inflammatory disease 3. Pregnant or Positive pregnancy test 4. Unexplained vaginal bleeding 5. Untreated severe cervical dysplasia 6. Abnormal adnexal /ovarian mass 7. Intrauterine device 8. Known recent rapid growth of fibroids, defined as a doubling in size in 6 months 9. Known bleeding tendency 10. Contraindication to MRI due to severe claustrophobia or implanted metallic device.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of technical successwithin one hourTechnical success was defined as successful completion of the planned treatment of target lesions

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of adverse effects and complicationsup to 18 monthsAdverse effects and complications will be recorded during each treatment procedure, during each hospital admission related to the treatment, during each clinical visit at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months
Assessment of volume change of the fibroids15 months after treatmentMagnetic resonance imaging will be performed at 3 and 15 month after treatment.

Countries

Hong Kong

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026