Skip to content

Patients With Distal Radius Fracture

Functional Status and Activity Participation Levels in Patients With Distal Radius Fracture

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04071002
Enrollment
53
Registered
2019-08-28
Start date
2015-01-21
Completion date
2016-09-01
Last updated
2019-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Physical Disability

Keywords

Distal radius fracture, functional status, activity participation, hand therapy

Brief summary

Surgically and conservatively treated distal radius fractures followed for six month. In this period 12 weeks rehabilitation programme applied for each group. Nine different evaluations were done in the initial, after physical therapy and 6th month. Results were presented.

Detailed description

Distal radius fracture (DRF) affects overall health status. The International Classification of Function (ICF) based approach is appropriate in the management of DRF. The purpose of this study was to investigate functional status and activity participation levels of DRF patients. The patients were divided into conservative and surgical groups and were admitted to 12-weeks rehabilitation period. The evaluation of the body function and structure were done with Visual Analogue Scale, algometer, range of motion (ROM) and grip strength. Also, radiographic evaluations were done. Activity participation assessments were done with Push-Off Test (POT), Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHOQ), Short Form of Disabilities of Arm-Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (Q-DASH) and Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT). Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon Tests were used respectively for intergroup and intra-group comparisons. Statistical significance level was p\<0,05.

Interventions

OTHER12 weeks physical therapy programme

The programme include contrast bath, bandage, massage, active exercises, resistive exercises.

Sponsors

Pamukkale University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged between 18 and 60 * Diagnosed with distal radius fracture * Primary fixation after injury.

Exclusion criteria

* Bilateral distal radius fracture * Concomitant ulna styloid fracture * Another orthopaedic, neurological or rheumatologic problem involving the ipsilateral upper limb * Patients who underwent surgery that involved ipsilateral upper extremity * Associated injuries such as nerve or tendon injuries * Secondary procedures at follow-up * Un-cooperated patients.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analogue Scalesix monthTo evaluate pain severity, patient show a point to indicate her/his pain between 0-10 points on a vertical 100mm line. Severity of pain was assessed with VAS in sleep, rest, and activity.
algometersix monthAn algometer is used to evaluate pain threshold of the patient for distal radioulnar joint, ulnas styloid, m.pronator quadratus, radial styloid, m. flexor pollicis longus, and triangular fibrocartilage complex.The threshold value of pain was recorded by placing the probe against the points. Then, it was gradually increased and reduced to apply a pressure of 1kg / 0.5cm² with 0.5 cm² probe head .
range of motionsix monthAn universal goniometer is used to evaluate patient's active motion of joints for wrist and forearm.
grip strengthsix monthGrip strength was measured by a hand dynamometer according to the American Association of Hand Therapy Association's standard grip strength measurement method. Right/left extremity and their progression are compared in this evaluation.
radiographic evaluationssix monthThe posteroanterior (PA) and lateral (L) radiographic measurements were assessed by an experienced hand surgeon to determine the type of fracture, geometry, and associated pathology. Radial length and radial inclination were assessed by PA radiography. Dorsal or volar angulations of the distal fragment were evaluated on the lateral radiography.
Push-Off Test (POT)six monthPOT was performed to determine the weight transfer strength of the patient to the injured extremity. The test was performed simultaneously and bilaterally by reversing the hand parts of the two hand dynamometers.
Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHOQ)six monthMHOQ was used for evaluating the participation and functional levels of the patients. In the questionnaire consisting of 37 questions under six headings, general hand function, daily life activities, pain, work, aesthetics and satisfaction are evaluated. In the pain scale, high scores indicate greater pain, while in the other five scales, high scores denote better hand performance.
Short Form of Disabilities of Arm-Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (Q-DASH)six monthIt was used to assess the upper extremity functional status of patients from their perspective. It is a questionnaire that measures an individual's ability to complete tasks, absorb forces, and severity of symptoms. It includes 11 item. The score on test ranges from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability). A higher scores indicate a greater level of disability and severity.
Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT)six monthThe seven individual subtests of JTHFT writing, card turning, picking up small common objects, stacking checkers, stimulated feeding, moving light objects and moving heavy objects, were performed as a standardized procedure.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026