Skip to content

Clinician Burnout and Social Determinants

Addressing Social Determinants of Health to Reduce Physician Burnout

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04070456
Enrollment
34
Registered
2019-08-28
Start date
2019-11-18
Completion date
2021-10-29
Last updated
2022-01-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Burnout, Professional

Keywords

Physician Burnout, social determinants of health, Mini-Z

Brief summary

Although clinicians recognize the impact of the social determinants of health (SDH) on patient care, clinicians feel they do not have the time or knowledge to effectively address patients' unmet social needs in the clinic. This can lead to feelings of distress and helplessness. The objective of this study is to test the impact of a tablet-based platform that enhances the role of support staff to address SDH on clinician burnout.

Detailed description

Clinician burnout has risen over the last decade, and studies have found that almost 50% of U.S. physicians show signs of burnout. Burnout is characterized by emotional exhaustion, feelings of cynicism, and patient detachment. Clinicians at the front lines of care, such as family medicine and internal medicine, are at highest risk, and burnout is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, alcoholism, and suicide. Burnout also negatively impacts patient care. The drivers of burnout are complex, and a growing body of research has focused on developing strategies to address both clinician and organizational factors. One potential contributor to clinician burnout that has received less attention is their patients' SDH. The SDH, or the circumstances in which people are born, grow, live, and age, have a profound impact on morbidity and mortality. Increasingly, national organizations have called for healthcare systems to address SDH, such as food and housing insecurity, to improve population health. Although clinicians recognize the importance of SDH on patient care, clinicians feel they do not have the time, knowledge, or tools to effectively address SDH, which can leading to feelings of distress and helplessness in addressing patients' unmet social needs. The SDH can lead to increased patient complexity and clinician workload. Also, the seemingly insurmountable social needs faced by many patients are a major contributor to the decline in medicine residents choosing a career in primary care. Thus, the lack of a tool to assist the primary care team in addressing SDH is a critical problem that can negatively affect both patients and clinicians. Our long-term goal is to enhance the primary care teams' ability to address the SDH by utilizing a mobile health tool that can assist the team in addressing patients' unmet social needs in clinical settings. Mobile health tools, such as tablets, have shown promise in reducing disparities in care and addressing unmet social needs in pediatric practices. However, there is little data about how addressing SDH affects physician burnout. Mobile health tools have the potential to collect patient-reported data and connect patients to appropriate support personnel without interfering with clinic workflow and enhance the primary care teams' ability to provide patients with resources. The objective of this study is to test the impact of a tablet-based platform that enhances the role of support staff to address SDH on clinician burnout.

Interventions

OTHERTablet-based SDH tool

A tablet-based SDH tool, which integrates responses into the EpicCare electronic health record (EHR).

Sponsors

Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* All clinicians and primary care teams at participating sites will be eligible

Exclusion criteria

* There are no specific

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mini-Z ScaleBaselineThis scales measures clinician satisfaction. Total score 10 to 45. Higher scores denotes better outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The number of clinicians who report a good work paceBaseline
The number of clinicians who report a joyful workplaceBaseline
The number of clinicians who report a supportive practiceBaseline

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026