Skip to content

Usability Comparison of a mHealth Application for Pre-anesthesia Evaluation Before and After Re-design of User Interface

Usability Comparison of a mHealth Application for Pre-anesthesia Evaluation Before and After Re-design of User Interface

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04070261
Enrollment
30
Registered
2019-08-28
Start date
2019-10-01
Completion date
2022-07-31
Last updated
2023-03-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Usability

Brief summary

Pre-anesthesia assessment is an important part of anesthesiologists daily routine. A thorough assessment leads to an impeccable anesthesia plan. In the past, the department of anesthesiologist in NTUH (National Taiwan University Hospital) utilizes paper assessment form. As government policy leans towards digitization, the department of anesthesiologist in NTUH collaborates with the information technology office to develop an electronic pre-anesthesia assessment system called EVAN, which is an iOS based application (App). EVAN includes an anesthesia patient list, patient EMR (electronic medical record) and pre-anesthesia assessment form. EVAN was online since March, 2018. This is an observational research to investigate the user experience and improve the user interface of EVAN. This research subjects include anesthesiologists from NTUH. This research has three parts: user tasks, questionnaires, and a semi-structured interview. First, the research assistant will record how the user use the App to complete the tasks, which includes video recording and App monitoring. After the tasks is completed, the subject will write a questionnaire. Then the principal investigator will give an interview for feedbacks from the users.

Interventions

OTHERiOS application usability test

user tasks, questionnaires, semi-structured interviews

Sponsors

National Taiwan University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* anesthesiologists in NTUH

Exclusion criteria

* none

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
task complete timethe duration the user needs to complete the tasks, usually within 10 minutesthe time duration the user needs to complete the user tasks

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
questionnaire gradingafter the user questionnaire completion, usually within 1 minutesuser questionnaire grading

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026