Skip to content

Standard vs Mini-PCNL for the Treatment of Stone Disease

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Surgical Outcomes Following PCNL and Mini PCNL in the Treatment of Kidney Stones

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04069013
Enrollment
18
Registered
2019-08-28
Start date
2022-05-01
Completion date
2025-11-11
Last updated
2026-01-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urolithiasis, Kidney Stone, Kidney Calculi, Ureteral Calculi, Kidney Diseases

Keywords

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, PCNL

Brief summary

Randomized comparison of patient outcomes following standard PCNL versus mini-PCNL.

Detailed description

This study is a randomized controlled trial which compares the operative outcomes and complications of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) versus standard PCNL for renal stones. This study will be a multi-institutional, prospective randomized controlled clinical trial with patients who have already agreed to undergo PCNL. Patients will be randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive either standard PCNL or mini-PCNL, defined as tract sizes of 30 and 16.5 to 18 French respectively. Patients will be asked to complete pre-operative, and post-operative quality of life questionnaires, and to allow collection of one additional vial of blood for measurement of factors associated with inflammation. The participating institutions are academic medical centers in the United States and Canada that are part of the EDGE research consortium.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPCNL

Patients receive standard of care treatment for their urolithiasis using one of two surgical procedures, either standard PCNL or Mini-PCNL

Sponsors

University of British Columbia
CollaboratorOTHER
Massachusetts General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Duke University
CollaboratorOTHER
Ohio State University
CollaboratorOTHER
Columbia University
CollaboratorOTHER
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
The Cleveland Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients planned for PCNL at participating institutions * Age ≥ 18 years old * Male and female patients * Patients of all ethnic backgrounds * Stone size 10-20mm Patients must be capable of giving informed consent and must be capable and willing to enroll and participate fully with the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Conversion to open procedure * Multiple access tracts * Anticoagulated or history of coagulopathy * Preoperative ureteral stent or nephrostomy tube placement * Technical problems/impossibility of localizing the stone on the day of intervention Patients unable to give informed consent or unwilling to enroll or participate in the study will be excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Blood loss as estimated by postoperative decreases in hemoglobin Blood loss as estimated by postoperative decreases in hemoglobin Blood LossPost-operative day 1Blood loss as estimated by postoperative decreases in hemoglobin Blood loss as estimated by postoperative decreases in hemoglobin Blood loss as estimated by postoperative decreases in hemoglobin Blood loss as estimated by postoperative decreases in hemoglobin Post-op decreases in hemoglobin

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Surgical outcomes30 DaysDischarge time
Complication Rates30 DaysComplication Rates
Renal Pelvis PressuresIntraoperativeIntraoperative renal pelvis pressures
Procalcitonin- Inflammatory MarkersPost operative day 1Procalcitonin
IL-6 Inflammatory MarkersPost operative day 1IL-6

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026