Skip to content

A Two-Part Infant Study for Early Diagnosis of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) and Evaluation of JNJ-53718678 in RSV Acute Respiratory Tract Disease

A Two-Part Study With a Birth Cohort (Observational Stage) for Early Diagnosis of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), Followed by an Optional Phase 2a, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study (Interventional Stage) to Evaluate the Antiviral Activity, Clinical Outcomes, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of JNJ-53718678 in Infants With Acute Respiratory Tract Infection Due to RSV

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04068792
Enrollment
22
Registered
2019-08-28
Start date
2019-10-10
Completion date
2021-05-15
Last updated
2025-02-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Respiratory Syncytial Viruses

Brief summary

The purpose of this two-part designed study is to assess in the setting of a planned early interception of pediatric RSV disease, early viral and disease kinetics (observational stage) and the antiviral effects of an Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) fusion inhibitor, JNJ-53718678 (interventional stage). In the observational stage the infant is closely monitored for early symptoms by the parent(s)/caregiver(s) and thus may be brought in for diagnosis earlier than in the typical setting.

Interventions

OTHERRSV Mobile Application

Participants will not receive any intervention in observational phase of this study. Participant's respiratory symptoms will be captured by RSV mobile application installed in participant's caregiver/parent mobile phone.

DRUGPlacebo

Participants in each Age Group (1,2,3) will receive matching placebo (volume placebo to match the calculated volume of the JNJ-53718678 dose) orally twice daily for 7 days.

DRUGJNJ-53718678 2.5 mg/kg

JNJ-53718678 will be administered to Age Group 1 twice daily for 7 days.

DRUGJNJ-53718678 3 mg/kg

JNJ-53718678 will be administered to Age Group 2 twice daily for 7 days.

DRUGJNJ-53718678 4.5 mg/kg

JNJ-53718678 will be administered to Age Group 3 twice daily for 7 days.

Sponsors

Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
28 Days to 4 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Part 1: Observational Stage * The infant is less than or equal to (\<=) 4 months of age at enrollment and asymptomatic for acute respiratory illness (ARI)-like symptoms requiring medical intervention at the time of consent to participate in the study * At least 1 parent/caregiver must be able to use the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) mobile application (App) at home via his/her own Android/iOS electronic device (compatible with RSV mobile App) * The participant must have been assessed per local public health practice and considered not to have Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection Part 2: Interventional Stage * The infant is 28 days and if prematurely born infant (that is \[i.e.\], less than \[\<\] 37 weeks and 0 days of gestation at birth) is at least 3 months postnatal age * The participant has been diagnosed with RSV infection using a rapid molecular-based diagnostic assay * The participant weighs more than 2.4 kilogram (kg) * The participant has an acute respiratory illness as evaluated by the investigator * Except for the RSV-related illness, the participant must be medically stable in case of allowed co-morbid conditions * The participant must have been assessed per local public health practice and considered not to have SARS-CoV-2 infection during this respiratory infection

Exclusion criteria

Part 1: Observational Stage * The participant has any physical abnormality which limits the ability to collect regular nasal specimens * The participant is receiving chronic home oxygen therapy at enrollment (applicable to both parts) Part 2: Interventional Stage * The participant is \<3 months postnatal age at screening and was born prematurely (i.e., \<37 weeks and 0 days of gestation) or if the participant weights \<2.4 kg * The participant has a QT interval with Fridericia's correction (QTcF) greater than (\>) 450 milliseconds per the machine read (mean of triplicate) parameter result confirmed by repeat triplicate Electrocardiogram (ECG) recording during screening * The participant is considered by the investigator to be immunocompromised, whether due to underlying medical condition or medical therapy * The participant has had any of: a) Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (test positive) during the four weeks prior to randomization, or b) Close contact with a person with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) (test confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection) within 14 days prior to randomization

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Viral Load-time Curve From Immediately Prior to First Dose of JNJ-53718678 Through Day 5 (AUC [Day 1-5])Baseline (Day 1) up to Day 5RSV viral load AUC was determined from immediately prior to first dose of JNJ-53718678 through Day 5. The RSV viral load was measured by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assay in mid-turbinate nasal swab specimens.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeBaseline, Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, and 21Change from baseline in RSV viral load over time was measured by qRT-PCR in the nasal swab specimens collected at the clinic visits and at home.
RSV Viral Load Area Under the Curve (AUC) From Immediately Prior to First Dose of Study Drug (Baseline) Through Days 3, 8, and 14Baseline through Days 3, 8, and 14RSV viral load AUC was determined by qRT-PCR assay in mid-turbinate nasal swab specimens.
Time to Undetectable RSV Viral LoadUp to 21 daysTime to undetectable RSV viral load is defined as the time in hours from initiation of study treatment until the first post-baseline time point at which the virus is confirmed undetectable. A confirmed undetectable sample is defined as the first of at least two consecutive samples that are undetectable. The last obtained sample for a participant, if undetectable, is considered confirmed.
Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Time Point Throughout the StudyBaseline, Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 21Percentage of participants with undetectable RSV viral load at each time point throughout the study were reported.
Severity of Signs and Symptoms of RSV Infection Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcome Rating System (PRESORS)Baseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14, and 21The severity of signs and symptoms of RSV infection (breathing problems, retractions, tachypnea, breathing sounds, cough, tachycardia, nasal secretions, sleep disturbance, crying, illness behavior, feeding problems, and dehydration) were assessed by the PRESORS. PRESORS is a questionnaire by parent(s)/caregiver(s) recording presence and severity of signs and symptoms of RSV disease. PRESORS score consisted of 12-items, each score ranges from 0 to 3. A summary score was derived (mean of the item scores) which also ranges from 0 to 3. The higher the score, the worse the symptom.
Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) PRESORS ScoresBaseline, Day 3, 5, 8, 14, 21PRESORS is a questionnaire recording presence and severity of signs and symptoms of RSV disease. PRESORS score consisted of 12-items, each item score ranges from 0 to 3. A summary score was derived (mean of the item scores) which also ranges from 0 to 3. The higher the score, the worse the symptom.
Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreBaseline, Day 3, 5, 8, 14, 21Change from baseline in clinician (for concepts: activity level, sleep disturbance, breathing problems, retractions, tachypnea, feeding problem, cough, nasal secretions, wheezing, dehydration) PRESORS scores was reported. PRESORS is a questionnaire recording presence and severity of signs and symptoms of RSV disease. PRESORS score consisted of 10-items, each item score ranges from 0 to 3. A summary score was derived (mean of the item scores) which also ranges from 0 to 3. The higher the score, the worse the symptom.
Time to Resolution of RSV SymptomsUp to 21 daysTime to resolution from first dose of study drug until the first time of resolution of all RSV Symptoms (breathing problems, retractions, tachypnea, breathing sounds, cough, tachycardia, nasal secretions, sleep disturbance, crying, illness behavior, feeding problems, and dehydration). Resolution occurs when all symptoms from the caregiver reported outcomes (ObsRO) are scored as none or mild (score of 0 or 1, respectively) for at least 24 hours.
Time to Improvement on Overall HealthUp to 21 daysTime to improvement based on general questions on overall health was reported. Time from first dose of study drug until first time status of improvement of RSV symptoms reported as very much improved or much improved based on response to question 'Would you say the child's RSV symptoms have improved, are about the same or are worse than when the child entered the study'.
RSV Viral Load Over TimeBaseline, Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, and 21RSV viral load actual values over time was measured by qRT-PCR in the nasal swab specimens collected at the clinic visits and at home.
Time to Return to Pre-RSV Health as Rated by the Parent(s)/Caregiver(s)Up to 21 daysTime to return to pre-RSV health as rated by the parent(s)/caregiver(s) was evaluated. It is the time from first dose of study drug until the time to return to pre-RSV disease level.
Percentage of Participants Who Require (re)Hospitalization During Treatment and Follow-upUp to Day 31Percentage of participants who require (re)hospitalization during treatment and follow-up were reported.
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and TolerabilityUp to Day 31An adverse event is any untoward medical event that occurs in a participant administered an investigational product, and it does not necessarily indicate only events with clear causal relationship with the relevant investigational product.
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Chemistry Laboratory FindingsUp to Day 31Percentage of participants with abnormal chemistry laboratory findings (alanine aminotransferase \[ALT; Grade 1 and 4\], aspartate aminotransferase \[AST; Grade 1\], and Hyperkalemia \[Grade 1 and 2\]) were reported based on Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (DMID) toxicity grading scale. DMID toxicity grades ranges from 1 to 4. Grade 1 = mild: transient or mild discomfort (\<48 hours); no medical intervention/therapy required. Grade 2 = moderate: mild to moderate limitation in activity - some assistance may be needed; no or minimal medical intervention/therapy required. Grade 3 = severe: marked limitation in activity, some assistance usually required; medical intervention/therapy required, hospitalizations possible. Grade 4 = life-threatening or death: Extreme limitation in activity, significant assistance required; significant medical intervention/therapy required, hospitalization or hospice care probable.
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Urinalysis Laboratory FindingsUp to Day 31Percentage of participants with abnormal urinalysis (Hematuria- Grade 1) laboratory finding was reported based on DMID toxicity grading scale. DMID toxicity grades ranges from 1 to 4. Grade 1 = mild: transient or mild discomfort (\<48 hours); no medical intervention/therapy required. Grade 2 = moderate: mild to moderate limitation in activity - some assistance may be needed; no or minimal medical intervention/therapy required. Grade 3 = severe: marked limitation in activity, some assistance usually required; medical intervention/therapy required, hospitalizations possible. Grade 4 = life-threatening or death: Extreme limitation in activity, significant assistance required; significant medical intervention/therapy required, hospitalization or hospice care probable.
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsUp to Day 31Percentage of participants with abnormal ECGs findings were reported. Parameters for abnormal ECG findings were QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) according to Bazett's formula (QTcB) Interval (\[450 milliseconds {ms}, 480 ms\], \[480 ms, 500 ms\], and \[more than 500 ms\]), QTc according to Fridericia's formula (QTcF) Interval (\[450 ms, 480 ms\], \[480 ms, 500 ms\], and \[more than 500 ms\]), change from baseline for QTcB Interval (\[30; 60\] ms, and greater than \[\>\] 60 ms), and for QTcF Interval (\[30; 60\] ms, and \>60 ms).
Percentage of Participants With Vital Sign AbnormalitiesUp to Day 31Percentage of participants with vital signs (systolic blood pressure \[SBP\], diastolic blood pressure \[DBP\], pulse rate, respiratory rate, body temperature and peripheral capillary oxygen saturation \[SpO2\]) abnormalities (abnormally low \[ABL\] and abnormally high \[ABH\]) were reported.
Plasma Concentrations of JNJ-53718678Day 1 and Day 3No data was collected for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis due to small sample size. Hence, no results are reported.
Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseOn Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21Percentage of participants with worsening or improvement of RSV disease based on general questions on overall health was reported. Improvement is defined improvement of RSV symptoms reported as very much improved or much improved based on response to question 'Would you say the child's RSV symptoms have improved, are about the same or are worse than when the child entered the study'.

Countries

Argentina, Belgium, Panama, Taiwan, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
As per original dosing, participants were randomized to receive JNJ-53718678 matching placebo (for Age Group 1 \[greater than or equal to {\>=} 28 days and less than {\<} 3 months\], for Age Group 2 \[\>=3 and \<6 months\], and for Age Group 3 \[\>=6 months\]) orally once daily (qd) for 7 days. After Protocol amendment 2, participants were randomized to receive JNJ-53718678 matching placebo (for Age Groups 1, 2, and 3) orally twice daily (bid) for 7 days.
11
JNJ-53718678
As per original dosing, participants were randomized to receive JNJ-53718678 (for Age Group 1 \[\>= 28 days and \< 3 months\]: 5 milligrams/kilogram \[mg/kg\]; for Age Group 2 \[\>=3 and \<6 months\]: 6 mg/kg and for Age Group 3 \[\>=6 months\]: 9 mg/kg) orally qd for 7 days. After Protocol amendment 2, participants were randomized to receive JNJ-53718678 (for Age Group 1: 2.5 mg/kg; for Age Group 2: 3 mg/kg and for Age Group 3: 4.5 mg/kg) orally bid for 7 days
11
Total22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboJNJ-53718678Total
Age, Continuous4.10 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.962
3.18 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.343
3.64 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.707
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
10 Participants8 Participants18 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Panama
11 Participants10 Participants21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan, Province Of China
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants7 Participants15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 110 / 11
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 112 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 111 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Viral Load-time Curve From Immediately Prior to First Dose of JNJ-53718678 Through Day 5 (AUC [Day 1-5])

RSV viral load AUC was determined from immediately prior to first dose of JNJ-53718678 through Day 5. The RSV viral load was measured by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assay in mid-turbinate nasal swab specimens.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to Day 5

Population: Intent-To-Treat-infected (ITT-i) analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had a centrally confirmed RSV viral load of greater than or equal to (\>=) 1 log10 copies per milliliter (mL) above the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on the ITT-i set were performed as randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboRespiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Viral Load-time Curve From Immediately Prior to First Dose of JNJ-53718678 Through Day 5 (AUC [Day 1-5])26.13 log10 copies*day per milliliter90% Confidence Interval 23.701
JNJ-53718678Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Viral Load-time Curve From Immediately Prior to First Dose of JNJ-53718678 Through Day 5 (AUC [Day 1-5])25.10 log10 copies*day per milliliter90% Confidence Interval 22.497
90% CI: [-4.467, 2.416]
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score

Change from baseline in clinician (for concepts: activity level, sleep disturbance, breathing problems, retractions, tachypnea, feeding problem, cough, nasal secretions, wheezing, dehydration) PRESORS scores was reported. PRESORS is a questionnaire recording presence and severity of signs and symptoms of RSV disease. PRESORS score consisted of 10-items, each item score ranges from 0 to 3. A summary score was derived (mean of the item scores) which also ranges from 0 to 3. The higher the score, the worse the symptom.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 3, 5, 8, 14, 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV viral load of \>=1 log10 copies per mL above LLOQ of RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed), included all participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure; 'n' (number analyzed) included all participants who were analyzed at specified timepoints for specific category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 30.03 units on scaleStandard Deviation 0.287
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 8-0.36 units on scaleStandard Deviation 0.167
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 5-0.32 units on scaleStandard Deviation 0.291
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 14-0.42 units on scaleStandard Deviation 0.192
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 21-0.42 units on scaleStandard Deviation 0.192
JNJ-53718678Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 14-0.10 units on scaleStandard Deviation 0.192
JNJ-53718678Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 21-0.24 units on scaleStandard Deviation 0.276
JNJ-53718678Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 30.01 units on scaleStandard Deviation 0.212
JNJ-53718678Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 5-0.04 units on scaleStandard Deviation 0.162
JNJ-53718678Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 8-0.16 units on scaleStandard Deviation 0.151
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) PRESORS Scores

PRESORS is a questionnaire recording presence and severity of signs and symptoms of RSV disease. PRESORS score consisted of 12-items, each item score ranges from 0 to 3. A summary score was derived (mean of the item scores) which also ranges from 0 to 3. The higher the score, the worse the symptom.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 3, 5, 8, 14, 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had a centrally confirmed RSV viral load of \>=1 log10 copies per mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on the ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed), included all participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Here 'n' (number analyzed) included all participants who were analyzed at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) PRESORS ScoresDay 5-0.27 units on scaleStandard Deviation 0.309
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) PRESORS ScoresDay 14-0.73 units on scaleStandard Deviation 0.396
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) PRESORS ScoresDay 8-0.42 units on scaleStandard Deviation 0.314
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) PRESORS ScoresDay 21-0.70 units on scaleStandard Deviation 0.408
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) PRESORS ScoresDay 30.01 units on scaleStandard Deviation 0.341
JNJ-53718678Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) PRESORS ScoresDay 21-0.60 units on scaleStandard Deviation 0.39
JNJ-53718678Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) PRESORS ScoresDay 3-0.02 units on scaleStandard Deviation 0.249
JNJ-53718678Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) PRESORS ScoresDay 5-0.26 units on scaleStandard Deviation 0.437
JNJ-53718678Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) PRESORS ScoresDay 8-0.39 units on scaleStandard Deviation 0.508
JNJ-53718678Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) PRESORS ScoresDay 14-0.54 units on scaleStandard Deviation 0.396
Secondary

Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over Time

Change from baseline in RSV viral load over time was measured by qRT-PCR in the nasal swab specimens collected at the clinic visits and at home.

Time frame: Baseline, Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, and 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had a centrally confirmed RSV viral load of \>= 1 log10 copies per mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on the ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) included all participants who were analyzed at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 4-2.002 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 2.7624
PlaceboChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 9-5.046 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.8708
PlaceboChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 6-3.391 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 2.8796
PlaceboChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 10-5.782 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 2.3406
PlaceboChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 3-1.329 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 2.3903
PlaceboChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 11-5.580 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.8008
PlaceboChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 7-2.667 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.8529
PlaceboChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 12-7.225 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 0.9469
PlaceboChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 5-1.638 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.4728
PlaceboChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 14-5.439 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 2.0248
PlaceboChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 8-3.630 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.5622
PlaceboChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 21-5.907 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.6829
PlaceboChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 20.022 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 0.9247
JNJ-53718678Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 21-6.514 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.5001
JNJ-53718678Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 2-0.797 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.8465
JNJ-53718678Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 3-1.293 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.622
JNJ-53718678Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 4-1.857 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.9805
JNJ-53718678Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 5-2.222 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.4063
JNJ-53718678Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 6-3.153 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.5444
JNJ-53718678Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 7-3.552 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.1919
JNJ-53718678Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 8-4.634 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.6078
JNJ-53718678Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 9-5.564 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 2.216
JNJ-53718678Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 10-5.195 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 2.3057
JNJ-53718678Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 11-5.263 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 2.7523
JNJ-53718678Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 12-4.905 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 3.445
JNJ-53718678Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 14-5.588 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 2.7565
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Require (re)Hospitalization During Treatment and Follow-up

Percentage of participants who require (re)hospitalization during treatment and follow-up were reported.

Time frame: Up to Day 31

Population: The Safety set (SAF) included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, and were analyzed as treated, regardless of the randomized treatment group assigned. Where 'analyzed as treated' is defined as: Placebo: if only placebo doses received, and JNJ-53718678: if at least one dose of the active study drug received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Require (re)Hospitalization During Treatment and Follow-up0 Percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants Who Require (re)Hospitalization During Treatment and Follow-up0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Chemistry Laboratory Findings

Percentage of participants with abnormal chemistry laboratory findings (alanine aminotransferase \[ALT; Grade 1 and 4\], aspartate aminotransferase \[AST; Grade 1\], and Hyperkalemia \[Grade 1 and 2\]) were reported based on Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (DMID) toxicity grading scale. DMID toxicity grades ranges from 1 to 4. Grade 1 = mild: transient or mild discomfort (\<48 hours); no medical intervention/therapy required. Grade 2 = moderate: mild to moderate limitation in activity - some assistance may be needed; no or minimal medical intervention/therapy required. Grade 3 = severe: marked limitation in activity, some assistance usually required; medical intervention/therapy required, hospitalizations possible. Grade 4 = life-threatening or death: Extreme limitation in activity, significant assistance required; significant medical intervention/therapy required, hospitalization or hospice care probable.

Time frame: Up to Day 31

Population: The SAF included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, and were analyzed as treated, regardless of the randomized treatment group assigned. Where 'analyzed as treated' is defined as: Placebo: if only placebo doses received, and JNJ-53718678: if at least one dose of the active study drug received. Here 'n' (number analyzed) included all participants who were analyzed at specified categories.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Chemistry Laboratory FindingsALT Increase - Grade 19.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Chemistry Laboratory FindingsALT Increase - Grade 49.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Chemistry Laboratory FindingsAST- Grade 19.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Chemistry Laboratory FindingsHyperkalemia - Grade 130.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Chemistry Laboratory FindingsHyperkalemia - Grade 210.0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Chemistry Laboratory FindingsHyperkalemia - Grade 20 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Chemistry Laboratory FindingsHyperkalemia - Grade 10 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Chemistry Laboratory FindingsALT Increase - Grade 40 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Chemistry Laboratory FindingsALT Increase - Grade 10 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Chemistry Laboratory FindingsAST- Grade 118.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings

Percentage of participants with abnormal ECGs findings were reported. Parameters for abnormal ECG findings were QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) according to Bazett's formula (QTcB) Interval (\[450 milliseconds {ms}, 480 ms\], \[480 ms, 500 ms\], and \[more than 500 ms\]), QTc according to Fridericia's formula (QTcF) Interval (\[450 ms, 480 ms\], \[480 ms, 500 ms\], and \[more than 500 ms\]), change from baseline for QTcB Interval (\[30; 60\] ms, and greater than \[\>\] 60 ms), and for QTcF Interval (\[30; 60\] ms, and \>60 ms).

Time frame: Up to Day 31

Population: The SAF included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, and were analyzed as treated, regardless of the randomized treatment group assigned. Where 'analyzed as treated' is defined as: Placebo: if only placebo doses received, and JNJ-53718678: if at least one dose of the active study drug received. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed), included all participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsQTcB Interval (More than 500 ms)0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsQTcF Interval (30; 60) ms0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsQTcF Interval (More than 500 ms)0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsQTcF Interval (>60 ms)0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsQTcF Interval (450 ms, 480 ms)0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsQTcF Interval (480 ms, 500 ms)0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsQTcB Interval (480 ms, 500 ms)0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsQTcB Interval (30; 60) ms0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsQTcB Interval (>60 ms)0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsQTcB Interval (450 ms, 480 ms)20.0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsQTcF Interval (>60 ms)0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsQTcB Interval (450 ms, 480 ms)9.1 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsQTcB Interval (480 ms, 500 ms)0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsQTcB Interval (More than 500 ms)0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsQTcF Interval (450 ms, 480 ms)0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsQTcF Interval (More than 500 ms)0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsQTcB Interval (>60 ms)0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsQTcF Interval (30; 60) ms9.1 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsQTcF Interval (480 ms, 500 ms)0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsQTcB Interval (30; 60) ms9.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Urinalysis Laboratory Findings

Percentage of participants with abnormal urinalysis (Hematuria- Grade 1) laboratory finding was reported based on DMID toxicity grading scale. DMID toxicity grades ranges from 1 to 4. Grade 1 = mild: transient or mild discomfort (\<48 hours); no medical intervention/therapy required. Grade 2 = moderate: mild to moderate limitation in activity - some assistance may be needed; no or minimal medical intervention/therapy required. Grade 3 = severe: marked limitation in activity, some assistance usually required; medical intervention/therapy required, hospitalizations possible. Grade 4 = life-threatening or death: Extreme limitation in activity, significant assistance required; significant medical intervention/therapy required, hospitalization or hospice care probable.

Time frame: Up to Day 31

Population: The SAF included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, and were analyzed as treated, regardless of the randomized treatment group assigned. Where 'analyzed as treated' is defined as: Placebo: if only placebo doses received, and JNJ-53718678: if at least one dose of the active study drug received. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed), included all participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Urinalysis Laboratory Findings0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Urinalysis Laboratory Findings25.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

An adverse event is any untoward medical event that occurs in a participant administered an investigational product, and it does not necessarily indicate only events with clear causal relationship with the relevant investigational product.

Time frame: Up to Day 31

Population: The SAF included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, and were analyzed as treated, regardless of the randomized treatment group assigned. Where 'analyzed as treated' is defined as: Placebo: if only placebo doses received, and JNJ-53718678: if at least one dose of the active study drug received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability27.3 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability27.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Time Point Throughout the Study

Percentage of participants with undetectable RSV viral load at each time point throughout the study were reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had a centrally confirmed RSV viral load of \>=1 log10 copies per mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on the ITT-i set was performed as randomized. Here 'n' (number analyzed) included all participants who were analyzed at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Time Point Throughout the StudyBaseline0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Time Point Throughout the StudyDay 70 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Time Point Throughout the StudyDay 39.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Time Point Throughout the StudyDay 80 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Time Point Throughout the StudyDay 2145.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Time Point Throughout the StudyDay 920.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Time Point Throughout the StudyDay 50 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Time Point Throughout the StudyDay 1025.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Time Point Throughout the StudyDay 20 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Time Point Throughout the StudyDay 1120.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Time Point Throughout the StudyDay 620.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Time Point Throughout the StudyDay 1266.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Time Point Throughout the StudyDay 1433.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Time Point Throughout the StudyDay 411.1 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Time Point Throughout the StudyDay 1450.0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Time Point Throughout the StudyDay 412.5 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Time Point Throughout the StudyDay 1233.3 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Time Point Throughout the StudyDay 2166.7 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Time Point Throughout the StudyBaseline0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Time Point Throughout the StudyDay 214.3 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Time Point Throughout the StudyDay 311.1 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Time Point Throughout the StudyDay 50 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Time Point Throughout the StudyDay 616.7 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Time Point Throughout the StudyDay 716.7 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Time Point Throughout the StudyDay 825.0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Time Point Throughout the StudyDay 925.0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Time Point Throughout the StudyDay 1025.0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Time Point Throughout the StudyDay 1133.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities

Percentage of participants with vital signs (systolic blood pressure \[SBP\], diastolic blood pressure \[DBP\], pulse rate, respiratory rate, body temperature and peripheral capillary oxygen saturation \[SpO2\]) abnormalities (abnormally low \[ABL\] and abnormally high \[ABH\]) were reported.

Time frame: Up to Day 31

Population: The SAF included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, and were analyzed as treated, regardless of the randomized treatment group assigned. Where 'analyzed as treated' is defined as: Placebo: if only placebo doses received, and JNJ-53718678: if at least one dose of the active study drug received. Here 'n' (number analyzed) included all participants who were analyzed for specified categories.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Sign AbnormalitiesDBP- ABH0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Sign AbnormalitiesPulse rate- ABL0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Sign AbnormalitiesPulse rate- ABH9.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Sign AbnormalitiesRespiratory Rate-ABL9.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Sign AbnormalitiesRespiratory Rate-ABH0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Sign AbnormalitiesTemperature-ABL0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Sign AbnormalitiesTemperature-ABH27.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Sign AbnormalitiesOxygen Saturation- ABL0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Sign AbnormalitiesOxygen Saturation- ABH0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSBP- ABL9.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSBP- ABH0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Sign AbnormalitiesDBP- ABL9.1 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSBP- ABL0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Vital Sign AbnormalitiesDBP- ABH0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Vital Sign AbnormalitiesTemperature-ABH45.5 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Vital Sign AbnormalitiesPulse rate- ABL0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Vital Sign AbnormalitiesDBP- ABL0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Vital Sign AbnormalitiesPulse rate- ABH18.2 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Vital Sign AbnormalitiesOxygen Saturation- ABL0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Vital Sign AbnormalitiesRespiratory Rate-ABL0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSBP- ABH0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Vital Sign AbnormalitiesRespiratory Rate-ABH0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Vital Sign AbnormalitiesOxygen Saturation- ABH0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Vital Sign AbnormalitiesTemperature-ABL0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV Disease

Percentage of participants with worsening or improvement of RSV disease based on general questions on overall health was reported. Improvement is defined improvement of RSV symptoms reported as very much improved or much improved based on response to question 'Would you say the child's RSV symptoms have improved, are about the same or are worse than when the child entered the study'.

Time frame: On Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had a centrally confirmed RSV viral load of \>=1 log10 copies per mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on the ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here 'n' (number analyzed) included all participants who were analyzed at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 3: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 9: Very Much Improved60 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 12 Very Much Improved54.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 9: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 3: Very Much Improved0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 10: Very Much Improved36.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 7: Very Much Improved66.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 10 Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 15: Very Much Improved90.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 12: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 4: Very Much Improved0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 13 Very Much Improved90.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 15: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 13: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 7: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 14: Very Much Improved90.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 16: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 14: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 2: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 16: Very Much Improved77.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 17: Very Much Improved87.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 5: Very Much Improved0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 17: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 8: Very Much Improved33.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 18: Very Much Improved88.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 5: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 18: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 11 Very Much Improved54.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 19: Very Much Improved90.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 6: Very Much Improved66.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 19: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 4: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 20: Very Much Improved88.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 6: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 20: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 11: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 21: Very Much Improved88.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 8: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 21: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 2 : Very Much Improved0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 21: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 2 : Very Much Improved0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 2: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 3: Very Much Improved0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 3: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 4: Very Much Improved0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 4: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 6: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 7: Very Much Improved0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 7: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 11 Very Much Improved37.5 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 11: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 12 Very Much Improved62.5 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 14: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 15: Very Much Improved57.1 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 16: Very Much Improved80.0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 16: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 5: Very Much Improved0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 5: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 6: Very Much Improved0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 8: Very Much Improved50.0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 8: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 9: Very Much Improved42.9 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 9: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 10: Very Much Improved50.0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 10 Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 12: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 13 Very Much Improved50.0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 13: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 14: Very Much Improved55.6 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 15: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 17: Very Much Improved88.9 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 17: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 18: Very Much Improved80.0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 18: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 19: Very Much Improved75.0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 19: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 20: Very Much Improved70.0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 20: Very Much Worse0 percentage of participants
JNJ-53718678Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement of RSV DiseaseDay 21: Very Much Improved77.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Plasma Concentrations of JNJ-53718678

No data was collected for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis due to small sample size. Hence, no results are reported.

Time frame: Day 1 and Day 3

Population: No data was collected for PK analysis due to small sample size. Hence, no results are reported.

Secondary

RSV Viral Load Area Under the Curve (AUC) From Immediately Prior to First Dose of Study Drug (Baseline) Through Days 3, 8, and 14

RSV viral load AUC was determined by qRT-PCR assay in mid-turbinate nasal swab specimens.

Time frame: Baseline through Days 3, 8, and 14

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had a centrally confirmed RSV viral load of \>=1 log10 copies per mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on the ITT-i set was performed as randomized. Here 'n' (number analyzed) included all participants who were analyzed at specified timepoints. At Day 14, data was not collected due to low sample size.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
PlaceboRSV Viral Load Area Under the Curve (AUC) From Immediately Prior to First Dose of Study Drug (Baseline) Through Days 3, 8, and 14Day 314.44 log10 copies*hour per milliliter (h/mL)
PlaceboRSV Viral Load Area Under the Curve (AUC) From Immediately Prior to First Dose of Study Drug (Baseline) Through Days 3, 8, and 14Day 839.20 log10 copies*hour per milliliter (h/mL)
JNJ-53718678RSV Viral Load Area Under the Curve (AUC) From Immediately Prior to First Dose of Study Drug (Baseline) Through Days 3, 8, and 14Day 313.70 log10 copies*hour per milliliter (h/mL)
JNJ-53718678RSV Viral Load Area Under the Curve (AUC) From Immediately Prior to First Dose of Study Drug (Baseline) Through Days 3, 8, and 14Day 835.11 log10 copies*hour per milliliter (h/mL)
Secondary

RSV Viral Load Over Time

RSV viral load actual values over time was measured by qRT-PCR in the nasal swab specimens collected at the clinic visits and at home.

Time frame: Baseline, Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, and 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had a centrally confirmed RSV viral load of \>= 1 log10 copies per mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on the ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here 'n' (number analyzed) included all participants who were analyzed at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboRSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 74.953 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.05
PlaceboRSV Viral Load Over TimeBaseline7.744 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.1991
PlaceboRSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 27.748 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.2387
PlaceboRSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 36.415 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 2.3924
PlaceboRSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 45.600 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 2.2868
PlaceboRSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 56.105 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.3664
PlaceboRSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 64.335 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 2.3774
PlaceboRSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 84.020 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 0.9431
PlaceboRSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 93.145 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.8643
PlaceboRSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 102.657 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.9192
PlaceboRSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 112.598 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.6655
PlaceboRSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 120.967 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.6743
PlaceboRSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 142.352 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 2.37
PlaceboRSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 211.837 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.9135
JNJ-53718678RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 113.059 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 2.6895
JNJ-53718678RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 82.924 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 2.1366
JNJ-53718678RSV Viral Load Over TimeBaseline7.477 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.4111
JNJ-53718678RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 142.020 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 2.4599
JNJ-53718678RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 26.613 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 3.2426
JNJ-53718678RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 92.666 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 2.1545
JNJ-53718678RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 36.277 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 2.8027
JNJ-53718678RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 123.417 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 3.4191
JNJ-53718678RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 45.683 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 3.2009
JNJ-53718678RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 103.035 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 2.2622
JNJ-53718678RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 55.287 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 2.0195
JNJ-53718678RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 210.883 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.3426
JNJ-53718678RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 64.023 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 2.8076
JNJ-53718678RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 73.624 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 2.4153
Secondary

Severity of Signs and Symptoms of RSV Infection Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcome Rating System (PRESORS)

The severity of signs and symptoms of RSV infection (breathing problems, retractions, tachypnea, breathing sounds, cough, tachycardia, nasal secretions, sleep disturbance, crying, illness behavior, feeding problems, and dehydration) were assessed by the PRESORS. PRESORS is a questionnaire by parent(s)/caregiver(s) recording presence and severity of signs and symptoms of RSV disease. PRESORS score consisted of 12-items, each score ranges from 0 to 3. A summary score was derived (mean of the item scores) which also ranges from 0 to 3. The higher the score, the worse the symptom.

Time frame: Baseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14, and 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had a centrally confirmed RSV viral load of \>=1 log10 copies per mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on the ITT-i set was performed as randomized. Here 'n' (number analyzed) included all participants who were analyzed at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboSeverity of Signs and Symptoms of RSV Infection Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcome Rating System (PRESORS)Baseline0.92 Unit on scaleStandard Deviation 0.345
PlaceboSeverity of Signs and Symptoms of RSV Infection Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcome Rating System (PRESORS)Day 30.98 Unit on scaleStandard Deviation 0.535
PlaceboSeverity of Signs and Symptoms of RSV Infection Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcome Rating System (PRESORS)Day 50.65 Unit on scaleStandard Deviation 0.456
PlaceboSeverity of Signs and Symptoms of RSV Infection Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcome Rating System (PRESORS)Day 80.61 Unit on scaleStandard Deviation 0.461
PlaceboSeverity of Signs and Symptoms of RSV Infection Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcome Rating System (PRESORS)Day 140.14 Unit on scaleStandard Deviation 0.323
PlaceboSeverity of Signs and Symptoms of RSV Infection Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcome Rating System (PRESORS)Day 210.15 Unit on scaleStandard Deviation 0.337
JNJ-53718678Severity of Signs and Symptoms of RSV Infection Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcome Rating System (PRESORS)Day 140.08 Unit on scaleStandard Deviation 0.162
JNJ-53718678Severity of Signs and Symptoms of RSV Infection Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcome Rating System (PRESORS)Baseline0.56 Unit on scaleStandard Deviation 0.527
JNJ-53718678Severity of Signs and Symptoms of RSV Infection Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcome Rating System (PRESORS)Day 80.23 Unit on scaleStandard Deviation 0.285
JNJ-53718678Severity of Signs and Symptoms of RSV Infection Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcome Rating System (PRESORS)Day 30.60 Unit on scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
JNJ-53718678Severity of Signs and Symptoms of RSV Infection Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcome Rating System (PRESORS)Day 210.02 Unit on scaleStandard Deviation 0.053
JNJ-53718678Severity of Signs and Symptoms of RSV Infection Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcome Rating System (PRESORS)Day 50.37 Unit on scaleStandard Deviation 0.398
Secondary

Time to Improvement on Overall Health

Time to improvement based on general questions on overall health was reported. Time from first dose of study drug until first time status of improvement of RSV symptoms reported as very much improved or much improved based on response to question 'Would you say the child's RSV symptoms have improved, are about the same or are worse than when the child entered the study'.

Time frame: Up to 21 days

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had a centrally confirmed RSV viral load of \>=1 log10 copies per mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on the ITT-i set was performed as randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboTime to Improvement on Overall Health188.3 Hours
JNJ-53718678Time to Improvement on Overall Health199.7 Hours
Secondary

Time to Resolution of RSV Symptoms

Time to resolution from first dose of study drug until the first time of resolution of all RSV Symptoms (breathing problems, retractions, tachypnea, breathing sounds, cough, tachycardia, nasal secretions, sleep disturbance, crying, illness behavior, feeding problems, and dehydration). Resolution occurs when all symptoms from the caregiver reported outcomes (ObsRO) are scored as none or mild (score of 0 or 1, respectively) for at least 24 hours.

Time frame: Up to 21 days

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had a centrally confirmed RSV viral load of \>=1 log10 copies per mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on the ITT-i set were performed as randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboTime to Resolution of RSV Symptoms194.00 Hours
JNJ-53718678Time to Resolution of RSV Symptoms118.60 Hours
Secondary

Time to Return to Pre-RSV Health as Rated by the Parent(s)/Caregiver(s)

Time to return to pre-RSV health as rated by the parent(s)/caregiver(s) was evaluated. It is the time from first dose of study drug until the time to return to pre-RSV disease level.

Time frame: Up to 21 days

Population: Data was not collected due to low number of participants. Hence, no results are reported.

Secondary

Time to Undetectable RSV Viral Load

Time to undetectable RSV viral load is defined as the time in hours from initiation of study treatment until the first post-baseline time point at which the virus is confirmed undetectable. A confirmed undetectable sample is defined as the first of at least two consecutive samples that are undetectable. The last obtained sample for a participant, if undetectable, is considered confirmed.

Time frame: Up to 21 days

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV viral load of \>=1 log10 copies per mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on the ITT-i set was performed as randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboTime to Undetectable RSV Viral Load500.1 hours
JNJ-53718678Time to Undetectable RSV Viral Load391.4 hours

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026