Skip to content

Career Enhancement Training Study (USAF)

Career Enhancement Training Study (USAF)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04067401
Acronym
CETS
Enrollment
1485
Registered
2019-08-26
Start date
2017-10-03
Completion date
2019-09-02
Last updated
2020-07-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Suicidal Ideation

Brief summary

A study evaluating a training program to decrease risk for suicidal thoughts and behaviors among early career trainees in the United States Air Force.

Detailed description

Relationship disruptions and social isolation are major precipitants for military suicides and a range of problems that impair functioning and reduce mission readiness. However, nearly all current military suicide prevention programming focuses on a narrow range of approaches for individuals already at high-risk (e.g., training to detect warning signs and refer for treatment services). This project addresses the need for universal prevention approaches to proactively strengthen protective factors across military populations, including strengthening social connectedness and skills to grow and sustain relationships across service. The aims of this project are to (a) develop an intervention for early-career, enlisted United States Air Force personnel using an active training approach to strengthening social bonds, and (b) test the intervention (i.e., Wingman-Connect) using a randomized controlled trial design. Wingman-Connect focuses on Airman-in-Training to build protective factors in: Kinship (healthy bonds); Guidance (support from mentors and mental health); Purpose (goals, sense of being valued and valuable); and Balance (self-care and support). Half of the training is focused on the class as a group to build belonging and shared purpose.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALWingman Connect

Wingman-Connect combines group and individual skill training. Group exercises build cohesion, belonging and shared purpose, and promote value of healthy unit, giving and receiving support. Individual skills promote the ability to thrive during transitions, manage stressors and meet career goals, and decrease barriers to utilizing organizational resources (family, health). The training has a total of 22 modules comprised of specific learning objectives and activities. Six months of text messages (1-2 per week) to reinforce and extend program concepts and skills.

BEHAVIORALStress Management

Stress management training reviews the basics of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis stress-response system; common experiences of stress (physiological, cognitive, emotional); the impact of chronic stress on the brain and other domains of health; how exercise reduces harmful effects of stress; and relaxation techniques that have been shown to reduce stress and adverse effects of stress on health. Additional modules review the physiological stress response and effects of stress on health; introduces how cognition influences stress responses; common cognitive distortions/attributions are reviewed that affect stress including strategies to strengthen protective cognitive responses. Six months of text messages (1-2 per week) to reinforce and extend program concepts and skills.

Sponsors

United States Department of Defense
CollaboratorFED
University of Rochester
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The study design will involve randomizing approximately 1440 Airman-in-Training (AiT) within 160 Technical Training classes to one of two conditions: Wingman-Connect or a brief Stress Management training. Randomization will occur at the class level, since Wingman-Connect is designed to train AiTs within a class together as a group (those who voluntarily enroll).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Airmen-in-Training (AiT) in Technical Training classes in the 365 or 363 Training Squadrons of the 82 Training Wing (82 TRW) * Eligible classes must be between 37-91 class days in length

Exclusion criteria

* Airmen from other countries receiving training in US * Airmen who are not in their first year of enlistment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Computerized Adaptive Testing for Suicide Severity6 monthsParticipants will complete a computerized adaptive test for suicide severity. Participants will answer questions about their mental health. Participant scores will range from 0-100 with 100 indicating higher likelihood of current suicidal ideation and higher risk for suicide attempt.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Computerized Adaptive Testing for Depression6 monthsParticipants will complete a computerized adaptive test for depression. Participants will answer questions about their mental health. Participant scores will range from 0-100 with 100 indicating higher risk for clinical depression.
Computerized Adaptive Testing for Depression1 monthParticipants will complete a computerized adaptive test for depression. Participants will answer questions about their mental health. Participant scores will range from 0-100 with 100 indicating higher risk for clinical depression.
Mean Behavioral Occupational Performance Outcomes6 monthsParticipants will complete 5 yes/no questions about job performance, including if superior has expressed concerns about work performance, if Airman has received corrective training for substandard performance, received a negative counseling statement, received a Letter of Reprimand. The sum of affirmative responses will be calculated. Scores will range from 0-5 with 5 indicating greater work impairment.
Mean Class Cohesion1 monthParticipants will complete a 3-item scale on how well members of their class cooperate, can depend on each other and stand up for each other. Scores range from 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating higher class cohesion.
Mean Number of Positive Connections to Classmates1 monthParticipants will be asked to name up to 5 other students in their class who they respect and would choose to spend time with. Participants can name 0-5 classmates.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment of classes was staggered over 16 months-Oct 2017 - Jan 2019-with classes matched. Clusters of class units within training squadron were formed over time as they became available, selected to maximize balance (e.g., AFSC), and randomized to one of two training conditions.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Wingman Connect
Wingman-Connect total training time is 5 hours, typically spread over three consecutive training 'blocks'(or days), plus 1-hour of booster training (one month later). Wingman Connect: Wingman-Connect combines group and individual skill training. Group exercises build cohesion, belonging and shared purpose, and promote value of healthy unit, giving and receiving support. Individual skills promote the ability to thrive during transitions, manage stressors and meet career goals, and decrease barriers to utilizing organizational resources (family, health). The training has a total of 22 modules comprised of specific learning objectives and activities. Six months of text messages (1-2 per week) to reinforce and extend program concepts and skills.
746
Stress Management
The control training condition will consist of a 2 hr. informational training that provides an overview of the human stress response system and strategies to manage stress. Stress Management: Stress management training reviews the basics of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis stress-response system; common experiences of stress (physiological, cognitive, emotional); the impact of chronic stress on the brain and other domains of health; how exercise reduces harmful effects of stress; and relaxation techniques that have been shown to reduce stress and adverse effects of stress on health. Additional modules review the physiological stress response and effects of stress on health; introduces how cognition influences stress responses; common cognitive distortions/attributions are reviewed that affect stress including strategies to strengthen protective cognitive responses. Six months of text messages (1-2 per week) to reinforce and extend program concepts and skills.
735
Total1,481

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall Studyno data provided10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject70

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicWingman ConnectStress ManagementTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
746 Participants735 Participants1481 Participants
Age, Continuous20.96 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.255
20.87 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.019
20.92 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.14
Educational Background
Associates Degree
72 Participants87 Participants159 Participants
Educational Background
Bachelor's Degree or higher
47 Participants54 Participants101 Participants
Educational Background
GED
30 Participants23 Participants53 Participants
Educational Background
High School Diploma
597 Participants571 Participants1168 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
137 Participants154 Participants291 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
608 Participants581 Participants1189 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Military Component
Active Duty
617 Participants596 Participants1213 Participants
Military Component
National Guard
92 Participants90 Participants182 Participants
Military Component
Reserves
37 Participants49 Participants86 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
6 Participants5 Participants11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
31 Participants31 Participants62 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
91 Participants83 Participants174 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
59 Participants72 Participants131 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
9 Participants10 Participants19 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
52 Participants51 Participants103 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
498 Participants483 Participants981 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
128 Participants125 Participants253 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
616 Participants606 Participants1222 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 7480 / 737
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 7480 / 737
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 7480 / 737

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Computerized Adaptive Testing for Suicide Severity

Participants will complete a computerized adaptive test for suicide severity. Participants will answer questions about their mental health. Participant scores will range from 0-100 with 100 indicating higher likelihood of current suicidal ideation and higher risk for suicide attempt.

Time frame: 1 month

Population: Some participants completed the main survey, but not the computerized adaptive test section.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Wingman ConnectMean Computerized Adaptive Testing for Suicide Severity11.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.25
Stress ManagementMean Computerized Adaptive Testing for Suicide Severity13.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.94
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-0.39, -0.09]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Mean Computerized Adaptive Testing for Suicide Severity

Participants will complete a computerized adaptive test for suicide severity. Participants will answer questions about their mental health. Participant scores will range from 0-100 with 100 indicating higher likelihood of current suicidal ideation and higher risk for suicide attempt.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Some participants completed the main survey, but not the computerized adaptive test section.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Wingman ConnectMean Computerized Adaptive Testing for Suicide Severity10.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.87
Stress ManagementMean Computerized Adaptive Testing for Suicide Severity12.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.5
p-value: 0.06295% CI: [-0.29, 0.01]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Computerized Adaptive Testing for Depression

Participants will complete a computerized adaptive test for depression. Participants will answer questions about their mental health. Participant scores will range from 0-100 with 100 indicating higher risk for clinical depression.

Time frame: 1 month

Population: Some participants completed the main survey, but not the computerized adaptive test section.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Wingman ConnectComputerized Adaptive Testing for Depression15.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.93
Stress ManagementComputerized Adaptive Testing for Depression18.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.87
p-value: 0.00295% CI: [-0.41, -0.08]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Mean Behavioral Occupational Performance Outcomes

Participants will complete 5 yes/no questions about job performance, including if superior has expressed concerns about work performance, if Airman has received corrective training for substandard performance, received a negative counseling statement, received a Letter of Reprimand. The sum of affirmative responses will be calculated. Scores will range from 0-5 with 5 indicating greater work impairment.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Wingman ConnectMean Behavioral Occupational Performance Outcomes0.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.93
Stress ManagementMean Behavioral Occupational Performance Outcomes0.28 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.94
p-value: 0.82195% CI: [-0.12, 0.11]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Mean Behavioral Occupational Performance Outcomes

Participants will complete 5 yes/no questions about job performance, including if superior has expressed concerns about work performance, if Airman has received corrective training for substandard performance, received a negative counseling statement, received a Letter of Reprimand. The sum of affirmative responses will be calculated. Scores will range from 0-5 with 5 indicating greater work impairment.

Time frame: 1 month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Wingman ConnectMean Behavioral Occupational Performance Outcomes0.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
Stress ManagementMean Behavioral Occupational Performance Outcomes0.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
p-value: 0.02495% CI: [-0.31, -0.02]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Mean Class Cohesion

Participants will complete a 3-item scale on how well members of their class cooperate, can depend on each other and stand up for each other. Scores range from 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating higher class cohesion.

Time frame: 1 month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Wingman ConnectMean Class Cohesion3.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.72
Stress ManagementMean Class Cohesion3.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
p-value: 0.01295% CI: [0.04, 0.29]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Mean Computerized Adaptive Testing for Depression

Participants will complete a computerized adaptive test for depression. Participants will answer questions about their mental health. Participant scores will range from 0-100 with 100 indicating higher risk for clinical depression.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Some participants completed the main survey, but not the computerized adaptive test section.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Wingman ConnectMean Computerized Adaptive Testing for Depression13.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.18
Stress ManagementMean Computerized Adaptive Testing for Depression15.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.21
p-value: 0.02795% CI: [-0.34, -0.02]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Mean Number of Positive Connections to Classmates

Participants will be asked to name up to 5 other students in their class who they respect and would choose to spend time with. Participants can name 0-5 classmates.

Time frame: 1 month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Wingman ConnectMean Number of Positive Connections to Classmates2.08 classmatesStandard Deviation 1.61
Stress ManagementMean Number of Positive Connections to Classmates1.83 classmatesStandard Deviation 1.56
p-value: 0.0195% CI: [0.05, 0.35]Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026