Skip to content

Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of the Combination of Tropifexor & Licogliflozin and Each Monotherapy, Compared With Placebo in Adult Patients With NASH and Liver Fibrosis.

A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Multicenter Study to Assess Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Oral Tropifexor (LJN452) & Licogliflozin (LIK066) Combination Therapy and Each Monotherapy, Compared With Placebo for Treatment of Adult Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) and Liver Fibrosis.(ELIVATE)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04065841
Acronym
ELIVATE
Enrollment
234
Registered
2019-08-22
Start date
2019-12-30
Completion date
2022-10-27
Last updated
2025-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non Alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)

Keywords

NASH, Non alcoholic steatohepatitis, Tropifexor, LJN452, Licogliflozin, LIK066, Placebo

Brief summary

Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study to assess efficacy, safety, and tolerability of oral tropifexor & licogliflozin combination therapy and each monotherapy, compared with placebo for treatment of adult patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and liver fibrosis.

Detailed description

The study consisted of 1) a screening period, 2) a treatment period starting from randomization on Day 0 and running to Week 48, and 3) a follow-up period of 4 weeks after the last dose of study treatment. The study duration from first dose of study medication was 52 weeks.

Interventions

100mcg+30mcg+10mcg capsules of tropifexor taken orally every day until the 140 mcg capsule of tropifexor taken orally every day is produced, then patients will switch to the single 140mcg capsule taken orally every day

DRUGLicogliflozin

30mg tablet of licoglifozin taken orally every day

OTHERPlacebo

licogliflozin placebo + tropifexor placebo

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Presence of NASH with fibrosis confirmed by central reader's evaluation of liver biopsy obtained no more than 6 months before randomization as demonstrated by the following: 1. NASH using NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) ≥ 4 with at least 1 point each in inflammation and ballooning and 2. Fibrosis stage 2 or 3 using NASH CRN fibrosis criteria

Exclusion criteria

* Type 1 diabetes mellitus * Uncontrolled type 2 diabetes defined as glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 9.0% at screening * HbA1c \< 6.5% at screening in Type 2 diabetics currently treated with insulin or sulfonylureas * Clinical evidence of liver impairment as defined by the presence of any of the following abnormalities: * Platelet count \< LLN (see Central laboratory manual). * Serum albumin \< LLN (see Central laboratory manual). * International Normalized Ratio (INR) \> ULN (see Central laboratory manual). * ALT or AST \> 5× ULN (confirmed by 2 values during screening). * Total bilirubin \> ULN (see Central laboratory manual) (confirmed by 2 values during screening), including Gilbert's syndrome. * Alkaline phosphatase \> 300 IU/L (confirmed by 2 values during screening). * History of esophageal varices, ascites or hepatic encephalopathy * Splenomegaly * MELD score \>12

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Histological Improvement: Number and Percentage of Participants Who Responded at Week 48 Compared With BaselineBaseline, Week 48Response was defined as at least a one-stage improvement in fibrosis without worsening of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) Fibrosis staging and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Activity Score (NAS) based on steatosis, lobular inflammation, and hepatocyte ballooning assessment were determined by a Study Central Reader. NASH CRN fibrosis criteria: Stage 0 = no fibrosis; Stage 1 = centrilobular pericellular fibrosis (or periportal fibrosis in children); Stage 2 = centrilobular and periportal fibrosis; Stage 3 = bridging fibrosis; and Stage 4 = cirrhosis.
Number and Percentage of Participants With Resolution of NASH and no Worsening of Fibrosis48 weeksFibrosis staging and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Activity Score (NAS) based on steatosis, lobular inflammation, and hepatocyte ballooning assessment were determined by a Study Central Reader. NASH CRN fibrosis criteria: Stage 0 = no fibrosis; Stage 1 = centrilobular pericellular fibrosis (or periportal fibrosis in children); Stage 2 = centrilobular and periportal fibrosis; Stage 3 = bridging fibrosis; and Stage 4 = cirrhosis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Percent Liver Fat Content Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI - PDFF)Baseline, Week 48Change in liver fat content based on MRI-PDFF.
Number and Percentage of Participants With at Least Two Stage Improvement in Fibrosis Without Worsening of NASH48 weeksFibrosis staging and Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Activity Score (NAS) based on steatosis, lobular inflammation, and hepatocyte ballooning assessment were determined by a Study Central Reader. NASH CRN fibrosis criteria: Stage 0 = no fibrosis; Stage 1 = centrilobular pericellular fibrosis (or periportal fibrosis in children); Stage 2 = centrilobular and periportal fibrosis; Stage 3 = bridging fibrosis; and Stage 4 = cirrhosis.
Number and Percentage of Participants Achieving 5% or More Reduction in Body Weight at Week 48 Compared With BaselineBaseline, Week 48Whether the participants had 5% or more reduction in body weight.
Number and Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Resolution of NASH and no Worsening of Fibrosis OR Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least One Stage Without Worsening of NASH48 weeksFibrosis staging and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Activity Score (NAS) based on steatosis, lobular inflammation, and hepatocyte ballooning assessment were determined by a Study Central Reader. NASH CRN fibrosis criteria: Stage 0 = no fibrosis; Stage 1 = centrilobular pericellular fibrosis (or periportal fibrosis in children); Stage 2 = centrilobular and periportal fibrosis; Stage 3 = bridging fibrosis; and Stage 4 = cirrhosis.
Change From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeBaseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, follow-up (up to 62 weeks)To determine the relationship of investigational treatment and markers of hepatic inflammation in NASH.
Change From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeBaseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, follow-up (up to 62 weeks)To determine the relationship of investigational treatment and markers of hepatic inflammation in NASH.
Change From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeBaseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, follow-up (up to 62 weeks)To determine the relationship of investigational treatment and markers of hepatic inflammation in NASH.
Number and Percentage of Participants With at Least One Stage Improvement in Fibrosis48 weeksFibrosis staging and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Activity Score (NAS) based on steatosis, lobular inflammation, and hepatocyte ballooning assessment were determined by a Study Central Reader. NASH CRN fibrosis criteria: Stage 0 = no fibrosis; Stage 1 = centrilobular pericellular fibrosis (or periportal fibrosis in children); Stage 2 = centrilobular and periportal fibrosis; Stage 3 = bridging fibrosis; and Stage 4 = cirrhosis.

Countries

Argentina, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Puerto Rico, Russia, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

234 participants were randomized at 81 sites.

Pre-assignment details

One of the randomized participants in the tropifexor group was not treated due to loss of interest in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tropifexor Monotherapy
Tropifexor monotherapy arm: tropifexor 140 mcg capsule (+ placebo matching licogliflozin tablet), once daily orally
53
Licogliflozin Monotherapy
Licogliflozin monotherapy arm: licogliflozin 30 mg tablet (+ placebo matching tropifexor capsule), once daily orally
55
Combination Therapy
Combination therapy arm: tropifexor 140 mcg capsule + licogliflozin 30 mg tablet, once daily orally
84
Placebo
Placebo arm: placebo matching tropifexor capsule + placebo matching licogliflozin tablet, once daily
41
Total233

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event42101
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1222
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1000
Overall StudyProtocol Violation0100
Overall StudyStudy terminated by Sponsor22162817
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1120

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalTropifexor MonotherapyLicogliflozin MonotherapyCombination Therapy
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
6 Participants47 Participants11 Participants16 Participants14 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
35 Participants186 Participants42 Participants39 Participants70 Participants
Age, Continuous54.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.22
55.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.05
54.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.09
56.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.13
54.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.82
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
4 Participants8 Participants4 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
5 Participants41 Participants9 Participants10 Participants17 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
0 Participants7 Participants0 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
32 Participants174 Participants39 Participants40 Participants63 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants129 Participants26 Participants34 Participants43 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants104 Participants27 Participants21 Participants41 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 530 / 550 / 840 / 410 / 233
other
Total, other adverse events
35 / 5339 / 5554 / 8423 / 41151 / 233
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 533 / 554 / 843 / 4114 / 233

Outcome results

Primary

Histological Improvement: Number and Percentage of Participants Who Responded at Week 48 Compared With Baseline

Response was defined as at least a one-stage improvement in fibrosis without worsening of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) Fibrosis staging and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Activity Score (NAS) based on steatosis, lobular inflammation, and hepatocyte ballooning assessment were determined by a Study Central Reader. NASH CRN fibrosis criteria: Stage 0 = no fibrosis; Stage 1 = centrilobular pericellular fibrosis (or periportal fibrosis in children); Stage 2 = centrilobular and periportal fibrosis; Stage 3 = bridging fibrosis; and Stage 4 = cirrhosis.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants to whom study treatment has been assigned by randomization and had an assessment of response at Week 48. Efficacy analysis was conducted using the FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tropifexor MonotherapyHistological Improvement: Number and Percentage of Participants Who Responded at Week 48 Compared With Baseline6 Participants
Licogliflozin MonotherapyHistological Improvement: Number and Percentage of Participants Who Responded at Week 48 Compared With Baseline9 Participants
Combination TherapyHistological Improvement: Number and Percentage of Participants Who Responded at Week 48 Compared With Baseline10 Participants
PlaceboHistological Improvement: Number and Percentage of Participants Who Responded at Week 48 Compared With Baseline4 Participants
Primary

Number and Percentage of Participants With Resolution of NASH and no Worsening of Fibrosis

Fibrosis staging and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Activity Score (NAS) based on steatosis, lobular inflammation, and hepatocyte ballooning assessment were determined by a Study Central Reader. NASH CRN fibrosis criteria: Stage 0 = no fibrosis; Stage 1 = centrilobular pericellular fibrosis (or periportal fibrosis in children); Stage 2 = centrilobular and periportal fibrosis; Stage 3 = bridging fibrosis; and Stage 4 = cirrhosis.

Time frame: 48 weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants to whom study treatment has been assigned by randomization. Efficacy analysis was conducted using the FAS

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tropifexor MonotherapyNumber and Percentage of Participants With Resolution of NASH and no Worsening of Fibrosis5 Participants
Licogliflozin MonotherapyNumber and Percentage of Participants With Resolution of NASH and no Worsening of Fibrosis3 Participants
Combination TherapyNumber and Percentage of Participants With Resolution of NASH and no Worsening of Fibrosis10 Participants
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Participants With Resolution of NASH and no Worsening of Fibrosis2 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over Time

To determine the relationship of investigational treatment and markers of hepatic inflammation in NASH.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, follow-up (up to 62 weeks)

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. At each time point, only participants with a value at both Baseline and that time point were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 2-17.4 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 28.3
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 12-13.8 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 28.48
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 32-18.2 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 30.97
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 4-16.1 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 18.41
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 24-15.1 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 28.34
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 16-15.4 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 26.94
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 8-9.9 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 20.02
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeFollow-up-1.5 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 37.77
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 48-11.7 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 49.32
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 20-14.5 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 27.92
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 40-12.7 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 39.35
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 20-14.6 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 24.96
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 40-15.2 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 26.91
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 24-17.0 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 22.43
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 32-13.0 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 28.01
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 8-7.9 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 19.82
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeFollow-up-9.4 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 27.94
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 12-11.3 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 16.57
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 48-12.0 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 28.99
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 16-12.4 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 20.38
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 4-4.2 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 19.84
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 2-3.2 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 15.52
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 48-36.9 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 30.2
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 2-13.5 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 24.47
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 4-14.5 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 25.78
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 8-17.6 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 23.47
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 12-21.0 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 24.91
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 16-24.4 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 26.13
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 20-25.0 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 28.95
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 24-35.2 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 30.61
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 32-33.8 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 37.21
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 40-36.1 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 27.42
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeFollow-up-17.0 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 27.97
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 20-5.7 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 20.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeFollow-up-8.8 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 28.88
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 40-8.7 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 40.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 16-3.2 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 24.57
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 12-2.5 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 25.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 8-5.6 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 19.67
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 48-19.5 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 30.16
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 4-3.2 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 17.81
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 2-4.3 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 18.94
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 32-1.0 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 41.32
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) Over TimeWeek 24-4.0 units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 28.28
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over Time

To determine the relationship of investigational treatment and markers of hepatic inflammation in NASH.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, follow-up (up to 62 weeks)

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. At each time point, only participants with a value at both Baseline and that time point were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 2-7.9 U/LStandard Deviation 14.93
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 120.4 U/LStandard Deviation 21.34
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 32-2.0 U/LStandard Deviation 32
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 4-1.7 U/LStandard Deviation 17.43
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 24-1.4 U/LStandard Deviation 19.96
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 16-0.7 U/LStandard Deviation 21.71
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 81.2 U/LStandard Deviation 23.71
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeFollow-up-2.0 U/LStandard Deviation 21.21
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 48-0.7 U/LStandard Deviation 31.34
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 20-1.0 U/LStandard Deviation 22.46
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 403.2 U/LStandard Deviation 34.4
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 20-10.0 U/LStandard Deviation 19.81
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 40-11.9 U/LStandard Deviation 20.22
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 24-13.8 U/LStandard Deviation 19.81
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 32-11.2 U/LStandard Deviation 20.12
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 8-7.4 U/LStandard Deviation 14.12
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeFollow-up-8.2 U/LStandard Deviation 24.01
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 12-10.3 U/LStandard Deviation 13.25
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 48-11.3 U/LStandard Deviation 23.53
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 16-10.8 U/LStandard Deviation 16.37
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 4-2.4 U/LStandard Deviation 20.49
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 2-3.9 U/LStandard Deviation 12.98
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 48-20.4 U/LStandard Deviation 24.19
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 2-5.5 U/LStandard Deviation 19.38
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 4-4.9 U/LStandard Deviation 22.19
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 8-6.7 U/LStandard Deviation 20.13
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 12-10.4 U/LStandard Deviation 21.42
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 16-12.9 U/LStandard Deviation 20.98
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 20-10.8 U/LStandard Deviation 25.98
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 24-18.3 U/LStandard Deviation 23.26
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 32-15.4 U/LStandard Deviation 34.92
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 40-20.6 U/LStandard Deviation 22.57
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeFollow-up-10.6 U/LStandard Deviation 21.27
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 20-3.9 U/LStandard Deviation 14.23
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeFollow-up-3.3 U/LStandard Deviation 23.64
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 40-5.9 U/LStandard Deviation 23.21
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 16-2.4 U/LStandard Deviation 17.42
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 12-1.4 U/LStandard Deviation 19.08
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 8-1.6 U/LStandard Deviation 15.19
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 48-12.8 U/LStandard Deviation 17.01
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 4-2.2 U/LStandard Deviation 15.35
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 2-1.8 U/LStandard Deviation 13.46
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 32-1.1 U/LStandard Deviation 29.62
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Over TimeWeek 24-2.2 U/LStandard Deviation 21.96
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over Time

To determine the relationship of investigational treatment and markers of hepatic inflammation in NASH.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, follow-up (up to 62 weeks)

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. At each time point, only participants with a value at both Baseline and that time point were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 4-43.6 U/LStandard Deviation 60.28
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 40-38.8 U/LStandard Deviation 42.89
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 24-32.0 U/LStandard Deviation 45.55
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 12-37.4 U/LStandard Deviation 96.36
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 32-34.5 U/LStandard Deviation 37.31
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 20-32.9 U/LStandard Deviation 37.55
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 48-31.6 U/LStandard Deviation 46
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 16-39.4 U/LStandard Deviation 41.77
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 2-34.8 U/LStandard Deviation 46.06
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeFollow-up14.8 U/LStandard Deviation 69.63
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 8-37.9 U/LStandard Deviation 37.85
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 40-20.6 U/LStandard Deviation 30.99
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 24-22.3 U/LStandard Deviation 28.06
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 4-7.0 U/LStandard Deviation 20.56
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 32-19.4 U/LStandard Deviation 28.68
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 8-15.3 U/LStandard Deviation 28.06
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 2-2.8 U/LStandard Deviation 21.81
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 48-20.1 U/LStandard Deviation 29.1
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 12-17.5 U/LStandard Deviation 33.83
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 16-15.5 U/LStandard Deviation 33.94
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeFollow-up-9.4 U/LStandard Deviation 42.96
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 20-14.8 U/LStandard Deviation 41.11
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 48-44.1 U/LStandard Deviation 67.27
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 2-30.6 U/LStandard Deviation 45.85
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 4-41.7 U/LStandard Deviation 60.81
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 8-45.0 U/LStandard Deviation 69.45
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 12-48.0 U/LStandard Deviation 76.04
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 16-52.2 U/LStandard Deviation 78.29
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 20-50.1 U/LStandard Deviation 79.3
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 24-58.1 U/LStandard Deviation 82.45
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 32-55.1 U/LStandard Deviation 76.85
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 40-50.0 U/LStandard Deviation 72.08
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeFollow-up5.6 U/LStandard Deviation 139.33
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 162.2 U/LStandard Deviation 36.71
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeFollow-up7.3 U/LStandard Deviation 43.69
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 400.2 U/LStandard Deviation 54.04
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 125.2 U/LStandard Deviation 25.03
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 8-0.9 U/LStandard Deviation 33.16
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 328.2 U/LStandard Deviation 45.21
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 48-11.1 U/LStandard Deviation 38.01
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 4-1.1 U/LStandard Deviation 31.63
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 243.3 U/LStandard Deviation 44.08
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 23.8 U/LStandard Deviation 34.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) Over TimeWeek 20-0.8 U/LStandard Deviation 45.84
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Percent Liver Fat Content Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI - PDFF)

Change in liver fat content based on MRI-PDFF.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: FAS: all participants to whom study treatment has been assigned by randomization and had an assessment at Week 48. This analysis was performed in 40% of participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tropifexor MonotherapyChange From Baseline to Week 48 in Percent Liver Fat Content Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI - PDFF)-6.57 Percent liver fatStandard Deviation 5.913
Licogliflozin MonotherapyChange From Baseline to Week 48 in Percent Liver Fat Content Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI - PDFF)-2.64 Percent liver fatStandard Deviation 5.866
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline to Week 48 in Percent Liver Fat Content Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI - PDFF)-7.69 Percent liver fatStandard Deviation 6.702
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 48 in Percent Liver Fat Content Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI - PDFF)-2.58 Percent liver fatStandard Deviation 3.599
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Participants Achieving 5% or More Reduction in Body Weight at Week 48 Compared With Baseline

Whether the participants had 5% or more reduction in body weight.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: Data are reported for the total number of participants in the treatment group with response variable defined.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tropifexor MonotherapyNumber and Percentage of Participants Achieving 5% or More Reduction in Body Weight at Week 48 Compared With Baseline12 Participants
Licogliflozin MonotherapyNumber and Percentage of Participants Achieving 5% or More Reduction in Body Weight at Week 48 Compared With Baseline9 Participants
Combination TherapyNumber and Percentage of Participants Achieving 5% or More Reduction in Body Weight at Week 48 Compared With Baseline28 Participants
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Participants Achieving 5% or More Reduction in Body Weight at Week 48 Compared With Baseline3 Participants
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Resolution of NASH and no Worsening of Fibrosis OR Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least One Stage Without Worsening of NASH

Fibrosis staging and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Activity Score (NAS) based on steatosis, lobular inflammation, and hepatocyte ballooning assessment were determined by a Study Central Reader. NASH CRN fibrosis criteria: Stage 0 = no fibrosis; Stage 1 = centrilobular pericellular fibrosis (or periportal fibrosis in children); Stage 2 = centrilobular and periportal fibrosis; Stage 3 = bridging fibrosis; and Stage 4 = cirrhosis.

Time frame: 48 weeks

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tropifexor MonotherapyNumber and Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Resolution of NASH and no Worsening of Fibrosis OR Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least One Stage Without Worsening of NASH8 Participants
Licogliflozin MonotherapyNumber and Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Resolution of NASH and no Worsening of Fibrosis OR Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least One Stage Without Worsening of NASH10 Participants
Combination TherapyNumber and Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Resolution of NASH and no Worsening of Fibrosis OR Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least One Stage Without Worsening of NASH14 Participants
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Resolution of NASH and no Worsening of Fibrosis OR Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least One Stage Without Worsening of NASH5 Participants
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Participants With at Least One Stage Improvement in Fibrosis

Fibrosis staging and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Activity Score (NAS) based on steatosis, lobular inflammation, and hepatocyte ballooning assessment were determined by a Study Central Reader. NASH CRN fibrosis criteria: Stage 0 = no fibrosis; Stage 1 = centrilobular pericellular fibrosis (or periportal fibrosis in children); Stage 2 = centrilobular and periportal fibrosis; Stage 3 = bridging fibrosis; and Stage 4 = cirrhosis.

Time frame: 48 weeks

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tropifexor MonotherapyNumber and Percentage of Participants With at Least One Stage Improvement in Fibrosis6 Participants
Licogliflozin MonotherapyNumber and Percentage of Participants With at Least One Stage Improvement in Fibrosis10 Participants
Combination TherapyNumber and Percentage of Participants With at Least One Stage Improvement in Fibrosis11 Participants
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Participants With at Least One Stage Improvement in Fibrosis4 Participants
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Participants With at Least Two Stage Improvement in Fibrosis Without Worsening of NASH

Fibrosis staging and Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Activity Score (NAS) based on steatosis, lobular inflammation, and hepatocyte ballooning assessment were determined by a Study Central Reader. NASH CRN fibrosis criteria: Stage 0 = no fibrosis; Stage 1 = centrilobular pericellular fibrosis (or periportal fibrosis in children); Stage 2 = centrilobular and periportal fibrosis; Stage 3 = bridging fibrosis; and Stage 4 = cirrhosis.

Time frame: 48 weeks

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tropifexor MonotherapyNumber and Percentage of Participants With at Least Two Stage Improvement in Fibrosis Without Worsening of NASH3 Participants
Licogliflozin MonotherapyNumber and Percentage of Participants With at Least Two Stage Improvement in Fibrosis Without Worsening of NASH4 Participants
Combination TherapyNumber and Percentage of Participants With at Least Two Stage Improvement in Fibrosis Without Worsening of NASH3 Participants
PlaceboNumber and Percentage of Participants With at Least Two Stage Improvement in Fibrosis Without Worsening of NASH3 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026