Skip to content

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Immunoadsorption and Plasma Exchange for Acute Attack of Refractory Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Immunoadsorption and Plasma Exchange for Acute Attack of Refractory Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders: a Prospective, Multicenter, Single-blind, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04064944
Acronym
CAMPUS
Enrollment
144
Registered
2019-08-22
Start date
2019-09-01
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2019-08-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder

Keywords

Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder, immunoadsorption, plasma exchange, acute attack, refractory

Brief summary

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is one common demyelinating disease of the central nervous system in young adults, with high rate of disability and recurrence, and poor natural course, which can cause a serious burden on families and society. To today, there is still a lack of prospective, multi-center, large sample clinical trial evidence for the treatment and prognosis of acute attack of NMOSD patients. This study will conduct a prospective, multi-center, single-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial of acute attacked NMOSD patients in China. The researchers plan to collect 144 NMOSD patients with acute attack in three research centers of Guangzhou (the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center of Sun Yat-sen University, and the Guangdong 999 Brain hospital), to study the safety and efficacy of immunoadsorption therapy. The subjects will be randomized into immunoadsorption group and plasma exchange group, and the following indicators will be evaluated: (1) changes in EDSS scores and visual acuity before and after treatment; (2) changes in AQP4-IgG levels; (3) the safety of immunoadsorption treatment. This study is aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of immunoadsorption therapy for acute attack of refractory NMOSD patients, and to provide more sufficient clinical evidence for the therapy selection for acute phase of NMOSD patients.

Interventions

DEVICEblood purification equipment

The subjects enrolled in this study will undergo blood purification treatment, and will be randomized into either immunoadsorption group or plasma exchange group, and the following indicators will be evaluated: (1) changes in EDSS scores and visual acuity before and after treatment; (2) changes in AQP4-IgG levels; (3) the safety of immunoadsorption treatment.

Sponsors

Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University
CollaboratorOTHER
Guangdong 999 Brain Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients should meet the 2015 International NMOSD with acute attacks diagnostic criteria (including first episodes and recurrences) 2. When NMOSD Patients with acute attacks undergo a course of hormone shock therapy (5-10g total methylprednisolone), EDSS ≥ 6.0 or visual acuity ≤ 20/200 3. Serum AQP4-IgG positive (CBA test)

Exclusion criteria

1. Weight \<25Kg 2. Nursing or pregnant women 3. Unable to establish a peripheral or central vascular access 4. The use of rituximab and gamma-ball shocks within 3 months prior to enrollment 5. Using immunoadsorption and/or plasma exchange therapy within 3 months before enrollment 6. ACEI drugs must be taken within 1 week before the first treatment and during treatment and cannot be stopped

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in EDSS scores4 weeks after the last treatment vs.baseline ( first treatment)Changes in EDSS scores of 4 weeks after the last treatment of plasma exchange or immunoadsorption compared with the first treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of follow-up results of EDSS scoresthe next 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 months after the last treatment vs. baseline (that of the time before first treatment)Comparation of the changes in EDSS scores of the next day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 months after the last plasmapheresis or immunoadsorption treatment vs. that before the first treatment
Comparison of follow-up results of LogMARthe next 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 months after the last treatment vs. baseline (that of the time before first treatment)Comparation of the changes in LogMAR of the next day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 months after the last plasmapheresis or immunoadsorption treatment vs. that before the first treatment (NMO patients)
Comparison of follow-up results of AQP4-IgG levelthe next 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 months after the last treatment vs. baseline (that of the time before first treatment)Comparation of the changes in AQP4-IgG level of the next day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 months after the last plasmapheresis or immunoadsorption treatment vs. that before the first treatment

Contacts

Primary ContactWei Qiu
qw9406@gmail.com0086- 15899968330

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026