Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal, Healthy Volunteers
Conditions
Keywords
Radiation safety, Radiation safety climate, Radiation safety behavior, Quality improvement, Patient safety
Brief summary
This study aims to measure the radiation safety climate in the hybrid angiography suite using self-assessment and to investigate the relationship of radiation safety climate with their self-reported safety behaviors. The hypothesis is that a radiation safety climate does exist and can be measured using self-assessment. Additionally, it is expected that the radiation safety climate positively influences radiation safety behaviors.
Detailed description
Radiation safety in the hybrid angiography suite is a primordial safety component which is relevant for endovascular team members and patients. To date, many interventions which aim to improve radiation safety habits of an endovascular team focus on improving technology and team radiation safety knowledge. Safety literature has indicated that a safety climate can be identified as the shared perceptions of team members or workers about the safety in their workspace and that this safety climate is closely related to safety behaviors and outcomes. In endovascular specialties, the concept of a radiation safety climate remains unexplored. Therefore, this study aims to measure the radiation safety climate in a diverse pool of endovascular team members from different hospitals, using self-assessment questionnaires and to investigate the relationship of radiation safety climate with their self-reported safety behaviors.
Interventions
The rating tool contains 28 statements which cover 5 dimensions (Leadership, communication, commitment, resources, risk awareness) of the radiation safety climate. Participants are asked to indicate on a scale of 1 (completely disagree) - 3 (neutral) - 5 (completely agree) whether they agree with each statement. A composite radiation safety climate score is calculated by adding ratings on all items. Minimum scale score 28 - Maximum scale score 140
The rating tool contains 2 statements which cover 2 dimensions of the radiation safety behavior. Participants are asked to indicate on a scale of 1 (completely disagree) - 3 (neutral) - 5 (completely agree) whether they agree with each statement. A composite radiation safety behavior score is calculated by adding ratings on both items Minimum scale score 2 - Maximum scale score 10
The rating tool contains 2 statements which cover the radiation safety knowledge and behavior. Participants are asked to indicate on a scale of 1 (completely disagree) - 3 (neutral) - 5 (completely agree) whether they agree with each statement. Minimum item score 1 - maximum item score 5
Collection of patient-related data points Demographic information: ASA-classification, BMI Procedure related information: Procedural time, approach, contrast usage case difficulty Radiation safety parameters: Air Kerma, DAP, fluoroscopy time
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Endovascular team member group Inclusion Criteria: * Vascular surgeon OR surgical trainee OR operating nurse * Active at one of the participating hospitals
Exclusion criteria
* No
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Self-assessed radiation safety climate | Baseline measurement on study inclusion (Day 1) | Radiation safety climate using radiation safety climate tool |
| Self-assessed radiation safety behavior | Baseline measurement on study inclusion (Day 1) | Radiation safety behavior using radiation safety behavior tool |
| Self-assessed radiation safety knowledge and motivation | Baseline measurement on study inclusion (Day 1) | Radiation safety knowledge and motivation using rating tool |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Procedural radiation doses - Dose area product | Registration during endovascular EVAR procedure - Within 1 week after patient study inclusion | Procedural dose area product (DAP) |
| Procedural radiation doses - cumulative air kerma | Registration during endovascular EVAR procedure - Within 1 week after patient study inclusion | Procedural cumulative air kerma (CAK) |
| Procedural radiation doses - fluoroscopy time | Registration during endovascular EVAR procedure - Within 1 week after patient study inclusion | Procedural fluoroscopy time |
Countries
Belgium