Skip to content

AMI Construction in Lower Extremity Residual Limbs

A Novel Approach to Lower Extremity Residual Limb Revision to Augment Volitional Motor Control, Restore Proprioception and Reverse Limb Atrophy

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04063592
Enrollment
26
Registered
2019-08-21
Start date
2020-02-24
Completion date
2026-09-30
Last updated
2026-07-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Amputation

Keywords

Amputation, Residual limb pain, Phantom pain, Residual limb atrophy, Prosthesis control

Brief summary

This study will involve the development of a novel approach to lower extremity residual limb surgical revision that offers the promise of augmenting volitional motor control, restore proprioception and reverse atrophy

Detailed description

The hypothesis of this research protocol is that we will be able to modify the residual limbs of patients who have already undergone lower extremity amputations so as to include biological actuators that will enable the successful employment of next generation lower extremity prostheses, diminish/eliminate phantom limb pain, restore proprioception and regenerate lost muscle mass. The specific aims of the project are as follows: 1. To develop a standardized operative technique for both above knee (AK) and below knee (BK) amputation revision procedures that includes AMIs to restore musculotendinous proprioceptive capabilities 2. To assess the capacity for these actuators to provide enhanced motor control and sensory feedback, as well as ablate phantom limb symptomatology and augment residual limb muscle mass 3. To determine the reinnervation time course and longevity of these biological constructs 4. To validate the functional and somatosensory superiority of the proposed revision technique over standard approaches to BKA and AKA 5. To develop a modified acute postoperative rehabilitation strategy suited to this new surgical approach

Interventions

PROCEDUREResidual limb revision

Surgical procedure involving construction of agonist-antagonist myoneural interfaces (AMIs)

Sponsors

Brigham and Women's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Prospective clinical trial in which intervention subjects will serve as their own control

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Between the ages of 18-65 * Has already undergone a standard AKA or BKA procedure * Suffers from symptoms such as: * Intractable pain * Deterioration of skin on or around stump * Suffering from other sources of discomfort arising from stump * Intact inherent wound healing * Adequate communication skills * High motivation

Exclusion criteria

* Inadequate health to undergo operative procedure using standard anesthesia (i.e. cardiopulmonary) * Individuals with impaired wound healing * Individuals suffering from extensive peripheral neuropathies * Active smokers * Individuals with a history of poor compliance * Women who are pregnant or plan to become pregnant before surgical intervention

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Limb Morphology and Changes in Muscle VolumeYears 1-3Clinical examination and images from CT/MRI will be combined to construct a holistic view of the morphology of the residual limb. Imaging studies and limb measurements taken in clinic will also be used to measure muscle atrophy/hypertrophy over time.
Degree of Motor Activation of AMI Muscles and Volitional Control of Phantom LimbYears 1-3Clinical examination will confirm the sliding motion of the AMI constructs with radiologic evaluation measuring the length of muscle excursion through each construct. Functional testing and testing using a prosthesis will determine how well a patient is able to volitionally control the AMI muscles.
Evidence of ProprioceptionYears 1-3Subjective reporting combined with tests run using a prosthesis will indicate if proprioception is still intact after surgery. Results will be confirmed by monitoring brain activity during limb movement activities via fMRI.
Evidence of Sensory PerceptionYears 1-3Subjective reporting and clinical tests of Semmes-Weinstein and two-point discrimination will determine if the patient has sensory perception on the residual limb.
General HealthYears 1-3Patient-reported outcomes metrics from five validated tests (SIP136, EQ-5D, SF-36, LEFS, PROMIS) will be combined to create an overall picture of patients' general health during and after their recovery.
ComplicationsYears 1-3Delayed wound healing, infection, need for additional surgery, PE/DVT, death

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTMatthew J Carty, MD
mcarty@partners.org6179834555
CONTACTResearch Coordinators
limbrestoration@bwh.harvard.edu
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMatthew J Carty, MD

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 10, 2026