Skip to content

Local Anesthesia in Molar Teeth With Molar Incisor Hypomineralization

Effectiveness Of Local Anesthesia In Molar Teeth With Molar Incisor Hypomineralization-A Prospective Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04061096
Enrollment
38
Registered
2019-08-19
Start date
2014-09-01
Completion date
2018-05-01
Last updated
2019-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Molar Incisor Hypomineralization

Keywords

Anesthesia, Cold test, Electrical pulp test

Brief summary

To compare responses to electrical pulp test (EPT) and cold test among molar incisor hypomineralization (MIH)-effected and not MIH-effected carious teeth before and after administration of local anesthesia for caries removal.

Detailed description

Fifty carious permanent first molar teeth (25 MIH-effected, 25 not MIH-effected) were included. Firstly, radiographic caries depth, International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) codes and MIH levels of teeth were recorded. Then, during the treatment, EPT and cold test were performed before and after the administration of local anesthesia. Visual Analog Scale for Pain was used to evaluate cold test and pain during treatment. When interpreting results, significancy level was stated for the values of p\<0.05.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTEvaluation of cold test

Cold test evaluation to describe the sensitivity level of teeth due to induce the hydrodynamic forces in dentine tubules.

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTEvaluation of electrical pulp test

Electrical pulp test evaluation to describe the sensitivity level of teeth due to induce the nerve fibers in pulp tissue.

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTEvaluation of pain during the treatment

Describe the sensitivity level due to induce the hydrodynamic forces during treatment procedure.

Sponsors

Didem Sakaryali
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Masking description

no need

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy participants

Exclusion criteria

* Not being cooperative during treatment procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Electrical pulp test resultsTime frame of electrical pulp test evaluation was aproximately 1 hour for each participant.Electrical pulp test values at which patients felt sensitive were recorded.
Cold test resultsTime frame of cold test evaluation was aproximately 1 hour for each participant.Visual Analog Scale for Pain was used to evaluate the cold tests for before and after the local anesthesia. Visual analog scale was used to rate the sensitivity level of patients with 6 different faces representing different levels of pain from 0=no pain to 10=unbearable pain.
Pain during the treatmentPain during the treatment was evaluated for aproximately 1 hour for each participant.Visual Analog Scale for Pain was used to evaluate the pain during the treatment. Visual analog scale was used to rate the sensitivity level of patients with 6 different faces representing different levels of pain from 0=no pain to 10=unbearable pain.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026