Skip to content

Comparison of HFNC and COT to Diaphragm Function of Post-upper Abdominal Surgery Patients

Comparison of High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) and Conventional Oxygen Therapy (COT) to Diaphragm Function of Post-Upper Abdominal Surgery Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04059614
Enrollment
66
Registered
2019-08-16
Start date
2019-09-01
Completion date
2019-12-30
Last updated
2020-01-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post Abdominal Surgery

Keywords

HFNC, conventional oxygen, EIT, diaphragm thickness

Brief summary

This study aims to compare diaphragm thickness, air lung distribution, and several clinical and laboratory parameters on post abdominal surgery patients with conventional oxygen therapy vs high-flow nasal cannula

Detailed description

Approval from Ethical Committee of Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia was acquired prior conducting the study. Subjects were recruited using consecutive sampling method. Subjects underwent upper-abdominal surgery were screened. Eligible and consented subjects were randomized into intervention group (high-flow nasal cannula) and control group (conventional oxygen therapy). Subject and operation characteristics were recorded prior to intervention. Clinical parameters (vital signs, Borg Score, ICON) were recorded in 10 specific times. diaphragm thickness data using abdominal ultrasonography (USG) and air lung distribution data using Electrical Impedance Tomography were collected in 7 specific times while lactate and blood gas analysis were done 4 times.

Interventions

PROCEDUREHFNC; COT

HFNC: high-flow nasal cannula therapy COT: conventional oxygen therapy

Sponsors

Indonesia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients from 18 - 65 yrs old, * American Society of Anaesthesia (ASA) status I-III, * BMI \< 30, patent airway, * Measurement of Exercise Tolerance before Surgery (METS) Score \> 4, * P-POSSUM score \<10%, * agreed to the study

Exclusion criteria

* uncooperative subjects, * DNR (do not resuscitate) patients, * patients with tracheostomy, pleural effusion, pneumothorax or pulmonary atelectasis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
diaphragm thickness2 monthsdiaphragm thickness are measured sequentially by abdominal ultrasonography (mm)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
partial 02 pressure2 monthspartial 02 pressure were collected from arterial blood gas analysis (mmHg)
partial carbondioxyde pressure2 monthspartial CO2 pressure were collected from arterial blood gas analysis (mmHg)
ICON2 monthsICON were measured to observe hemodynamic status
electrical impedance tomography (EIT) data2 monthsmeasured data to assess lung ventilation volume and air distribution
heart rate2 monthsmeasured from monitor (bpm)
mean arterial pressure2 monthsmeasured from monitor (mmHg)
respiratory rate2 monthsbpm
lactate2 monthslactate were measured from arterial blood

Countries

Indonesia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026