Skip to content

Neural Exercises vs Surgery in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Effectiveness of Neural Mobilizations Exercises Versus Surgery in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04058041
Enrollment
54
Registered
2019-08-15
Start date
2018-03-12
Completion date
2020-09-20
Last updated
2019-08-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neuropathic Pain

Keywords

Neural mobilization, Surgery, Pain modulation

Brief summary

neural exercise in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome

Detailed description

OBJECTIVE: The aim objective is to compare the neurophysiological effects of the surgery versus neural mobilization exercises added to surgery versus only neural mobilization exercises on temporal summation and noxious inhibitory pain system and their relationship with the improve of symptoms, with pain and disability in patients with Carpal tunnel syndrome. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized parallel-group trial. BACKGROUND: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) such as a neuropathic pain condition with altered pain modulation and wind-up, but there is a clack of knowledge if some therapies could have a positive effect. METHODS: In the Humans study, 54 patients with CTS will be randomly allocated to either a surgery group (n=18) or Surgery with neural exercises group (n=18) or neural exercise group (n=18), the groups with neural exercise will received 10 sessions. The primary outcome will be conditioned pain modulation, temporal summation, pain intensity,. Secondary outcomes will be hand disability assessed with the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, pinch-tip grip force, and the symptom severity subscale of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, neuropathic pain questionnaire (DN4), psychological questionnaires (anxiety, catastrophizing, kinesiophobia depression and fear avoid questionnaires), and pressure pain threshold. Patients will be assessed baseline and post-treatment, 1, 3 and 6 months after the last treatment by an assessor unaware of group assignment Patients were assessed at. Analysis was by intention to treat, with mixed analyses of covariance adjusted for baseline scores.

Interventions

PROCEDURENeural Mobilization

neural exercise Will be performed in the patients

PROCEDURESurgery

open or endoscopic surgery will be permed in the patients with tunnel carpal syndrome

PROCEDURESurgery and neural mobilization

following the surgery patients will be treat with neural mobilization exercises.

Sponsors

Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Tinel and Phalen positive 4/10 in VAS Scale Increase symptoms at night 12 months of symptomatology Sensorial and motor dysfunction in the conduction of the median nerve

Exclusion criteria

Previous surgery Wrist fractures Rheumatoid Arthritis or Fibromyalgia Systemic disease Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Physiological parameterChange from Baseline Conditioned pain modulation at 6 monthsConditioned pain modulation: Diffuse noxious inhibitory control system will be measure with tourniquet test

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain intensityBaseline and 6 monthsVisual analog scale. A 100mm VAS, ranging from 0mm (no pain) to 100mm (worst imaginable pain).
Pain expansionChange from baseline and 6 monthsBody pain maps
Pressure pain thresholdBaseline and 6 monthsThree consecutive trials of pressure pain threshold on the active trigger point at a rate of 1 kg/sec at intervals of 30 seconds were conducted.
Psychological factors_AnxietyBaseline and 6 monthsState Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T)
Psychological factors_DepressionBaseline and 6 monthsBeck Depression Inventory (BDI-II)
Psychological factors_KinesiophobiaBaseline and 6 monthsTampa Scale for Kinesiophobia.. The score goes from 11 to 44. A higher value indicates a worse outcome.
Neuropathic painBaseline and 6 monthsNeuropathic pain Questionnaire DN4
Psychological factors_Fear avoidanceBaseline and 6 monthsFear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire (FABQ)
Disability_DASHBaseline and 6 monthsDisabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)
Disability_BOSTONBaseline and 6 monthsBoston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire
Strength_gripBaseline and 6 monthsgrip strength without pain
Strength_pinchBaseline and 6 monthspinch strength
Psychological factors_catastrophizingBaseline and 6 monthsPain Catastrophizing Scale. The scores goes from 0 to 52. A higher value indicates a worse outcome.

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Primary ContactJosué Fernández, PhD
josue.fernandez@urjc.es34914888949
Backup ContactLuis Matesanz
luis.matesanzgarcia@gmail.com675042482

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026