Skip to content

Team Approach to Polypharmacy Evaluation and Reduction in a Long-Term Care Setting

Team Approach to Polypharmacy Evaluation and Reduction in a Long-Term Care Setting: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04055896
Acronym
TAPER-LTC
Enrollment
15
Registered
2019-08-14
Start date
2019-10-15
Completion date
2021-03-30
Last updated
2021-06-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Frailty, Long-term Care, Polypharmacy

Brief summary

Medication side effects and interactions between medications are very common in older adults and are related to negative health outcomes. In this study, the investigators will test a new process aimed at reducing unnecessary medication use and drug side effects in seniors using the best medical evidence and patient preferences for treatment. This study will assess how feasible the implementation of this intervention is within a long-term care facility as well as if it is possible. Participants in two long-term care facilities will participate in this study. Measures will include feasibility outcomes regarding the logistics of the intervention as well as patients outcomes (falls, hospitalizations, and medications) collected before and after implementation. This trial will be a randomized control trial with an adaptive trial design.

Detailed description

There are substantial associations between polypharmacy and reduced function from older adults and this is likely to be important in frail older adults both in long term care and in the community. The reversibility of drug-induced mobility impairment is unclear therefore the investigators plan to investigate signals of any impact of reducing polypharmacy on mobility. The investigators chose the long-term care setting given the presence of complete medication administration records and this patient population's high prevalence of polypharmacy and risk of adverse drug events. TaperMD is an electronic tool for systematic medication reduction that incorporates patient priorities, electronic screening for potentially harmful medicines,supporting evidence tools and a monitoring pathway to support medication reduction. This study will examine the feasibility of this tool in a long-term care setting as well as examine. Participants in two long-term care facilities will participate in this study. Measures will include feasibility outcomes regarding the logistics of the intervention as well as patients outcomes (falls, hospitalizations, and medications) collected before and after implementation. The study will be an adaptive trial design with two phases. Phase 1 will be an internal pilot. This will allow the investigators to re-evaluate and modify outcome measures and processes as necessary. Phase 2 of this trial will allow for continuation after adjustments to the process or design has been made in a larger randomized controlled trial.

Interventions

Systematic approach to reduction in polypharmacy

Sponsors

Labarge Optimal Aging
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Canadian Frailty Network
CollaboratorOTHER
McMaster University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

The study will be an adaptive trial design with two phase. * Phase 1 will be an internal pilot to allow for refinement. * Phase 2 will be a larger randomized controlled trial after Phase 1 refinement

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
70 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* residing in 2 long-term care facilities in Brampton, ON * on 5 or more long-term medications * 70 years of age or older * adequate English language

Exclusion criteria

* terminal illness or other circumstance precluding 6 month study period * recent (within 12 months) comprehensive medication review

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Successful Discontinuation (Difference in mean number of medications; reduction in dose)6 monthsDifference in mean number of medications; number of medications reduced in dose

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in level of cognitionBaseline, 6 monthsThe Mini Mental Status Examination
Difference in level of quality of lifeBaseline, 6 monthsEuroQol five dimensions questionnaire (EQ5D-5L) will measure quality of life. Scores range from 0 (low quality of life) to 1 (high quality of life).
Difference in number of fallsBaseline, 6 monthsTotal number of falls resulting in medication consultation or treatment recorded in hospital admission and primary care records, and by patient
Difference in level of sleepBaseline, 6 monthsThe sleep question on the 15-Dimensional (15-D) scale will be used. Scores range from 1 (no sleep problems) to 5 (severe sleep problems).
Changes in medication side effects and symptoms (adverse)1-week, 3 months, 6 monthsPatient self-report of appearance (new or worsening) of side effects associated with medications
Changes in medication side effects and symptoms (positive)1-week, 3 months, 6 monthsPatient self-report of disappearance (improvement or disappearance) of side effects associated with medications
Difference in number of serious adverse events1-week, 3 months, 6 monthsAny event that requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, causes congenital malformation, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is life-threatening or results in death (Health Canada (2011) Guidance Document for Industry - Reporting Adverse Reactions to Marketed Health Products)
Difference in level of physical functioning capacity and abilityBaseline, 6 monthsTime on the timed-up-and-go test
Difference in level of performance of activities of daily livingBaseline, 6 monthsBarthel Index will be used to measure performance of activities of daily living. Ten activities are scored in terms of level of independence or assistance, with higher scores reflecting higher level of independent performance.
Difference in level of frailtyBaseline, 6 monthsThe total score on the Edmonton Frail Scale will be used to measure frailty. The scale included 11 items, with scores ranging from 0 (not frail) to 17 (severe frailty).
Difference in level of healthcare utilization use (emergency department visits)Baseline, 6 monthsNumber of emergency department visits
Difference in level of healthcare utilization use (physician visits)Baseline, 6 monthsNumber of physician visits
Enrollment rate6 monthsNumber of participants that enroll in study relative to number of participant invited to participant
Completion rate6 monthsNumber of participants that complete 6-month collection relative to number of participants enrolled
Time to complete measuresBaseline, 6 monthsAverage duration of data collection appointments
Difference in level of moodBaseline, 6 monthsThe total score on the Geriatric Depression Scale (Short Form) will be used to measure mood. The scale includes 15 yes/no items and score range from 0 to 15, with high scores indicating depression.
Difference in level of concern over fallingBaseline, 6 monthsThe score on the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (Short Version) will be used to measure falling-related concerns. The scale includes 7 items, with scores ranging from 7 (no concern) to 28 (severe concern of falling)
Difference in level of painBaseline, 6 monthsThe Brief Pain Inventory (short form) will be used to measure pain severity (mean of 4 items, rated 0-10) and pain interference (mean of 7 items, rated 0-10). Higher scores represent higher pain severity and interference.
Difference in level of incontinenceBaseline, 6 monthsFrequency of incontinence as recorded in patient electronic medical record
Difference in level of healthcare utilization use (hospitalizations)Baseline, 6 monthsNumber of hospitalizations

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Loved one's perspective of deprescribing6 monthsPerspectives from focus groups

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026