Skip to content

Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) Imaging During Transvenous Lead Extraction

Intravascular ultraSound (IVUS) Imaging During transvEnous Lead Extraction (ISEE)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04055740
Acronym
ISEE
Enrollment
31
Registered
2019-08-14
Start date
2019-09-13
Completion date
2021-10-31
Last updated
2024-09-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Device Malfunction, ICD, Pacemaker Lead Dysfunction

Keywords

CIED

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging as a tool for grading the presence and characterization of intravascular lead adherence (ILA, or scarring) to cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) leads during transvenous lead extraction (TLE) procedures in a multi-center study. IVUS should identify the location and severity of these adhesions, which the investigators will then correlate to difficulty of the extraction procedure using metrics like pulses of laser energy delivered and time required to traverse an area of fibrosis or ILA. The investigators will be focusing primarily on the section from innominate vein (INNV) down through the superior vena cava (SVC) to the right atrium. Using IVUS to view blood vessels and the heart structure is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Using it as described in this study is off label because of the manner in which it is advanced to the SVC, through the right atrium. While it is not restricted from use in this way, it is not specifically on-label. It should be noted that the use of IVUS during TLE procedures as proposed in this study is routine at the University of Chicago and patients will undergo this procedure regardless of participation in this study. The EP physician team regards the use of IVUS during TLE to be nonsignificant risk.

Interventions

DEVICEIVUS Imaging

IVUS or radial-ICE (intracardiac echocardiography) is a visualization tool used in many cardiac procedures including electrophysiology procedures (catheter ablation). Its utility in identifying ILA will be assessed in this study.

Sponsors

University of Chicago
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Single cohort of patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients at least 21 years of age * Patients with at least one lead over 1 year dwell time requiring extraction

Exclusion criteria

* Inability of patient capacity to provide consent for themselves either due to medical or psychiatric comorbidity * Venous occlusion to the extent that the IVUS catheter cannot pass * Leads \< 1 year dwell time requiring extraction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
IVUS Grades6 hoursOperators will be able to successfully grade the degree of intravascular lead adherence (ILA) seen using IVUS imaging. Using the following scale, grading of ILA in each zone of interest, based on relative motion of lead will be performed: i. Grade 1: Freely mobile, Rarely adjacent to vasculature ii. Grade 2: Restricted mobility, Frequently adjacent to vasculature iii. Grade 3: Immobile, Always adjacent to vasculature iv. Grade L, added to number: Lead-to-lead binding

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Extraction Difficulty MetricsThrough study completion, expected to be 6 monthsOperators will record the energy and time necessary to traverse binding sites and will be able to correlate these two metrics to IVUS ILA grade Extraction difficulty was measured by correlating IVUS ILA grade to lead dwell time - the amount of time it took to extract the lead. Using the following scale, grading of ILA in each zone of interest, based on relative motion of lead was performed: i. Grade 1: Freely mobile, Rarely adjacent to vasculature ii. Grade 2: Restricted mobility, Frequently adjacent to vasculature iii. Grade 3: Immobile, Always adjacent to vasculature iv. Grade L, added to number: Lead-to-lead binding

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Enrollment closed across the study due to low enrollment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
IVUS Imaging
IVUS imaging will be used each patient undergoing transvenous lead extraction to visualize ILA IVUS Imaging: IVUS or radial-ICE (intracardiac echocardiography) is a visualization tool used in many cardiac procedures including electrophysiology procedures (catheter ablation). Its utility in identifying ILA will be assessed in this study.
31
Total31

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIVUS Imaging
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
12 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
18 Participants
Age, Continuous63.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.64
Body mass index (BMI)29.68 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.29
Height170.2 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.64
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
17 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 31
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 31
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 31

Outcome results

Primary

IVUS Grades

Operators will be able to successfully grade the degree of intravascular lead adherence (ILA) seen using IVUS imaging. Using the following scale, grading of ILA in each zone of interest, based on relative motion of lead will be performed: i. Grade 1: Freely mobile, Rarely adjacent to vasculature ii. Grade 2: Restricted mobility, Frequently adjacent to vasculature iii. Grade 3: Immobile, Always adjacent to vasculature iv. Grade L, added to number: Lead-to-lead binding

Time frame: 6 hours

Population: 3 patients did not have any ILA grades.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IVUS ImagingIVUS GradesRight sided devices Zone1/21.33 GradeStandard Deviation 0.58
IVUS ImagingIVUS GradesRight sided devices Zone 31 GradeStandard Deviation 0
IVUS ImagingIVUS GradesLeft sided devices Zone 11.57 GradeStandard Deviation 0.81
IVUS ImagingIVUS GradesLeft sided devices Zone 21.44 GradeStandard Deviation 0.58
IVUS ImagingIVUS GradesLeft sided devices Zone 31.32 GradeStandard Deviation 0.63
IVUS ImagingIVUS GradesAll devices, all zones1.40 GradeStandard Deviation 0.5
Comparison: H0: rho = 0 Spearman correlation coefficient calculated between average ILA grade and total time of lead extractionp-value: 0.2201Spearman Correlation Coefficient
Comparison: H0: rho = 0 Spearman Correlation coefficient calculated between average ILA grades and laser pulsationsp-value: 0.5157Spearman Correlation Coefficient
Secondary

Extraction Difficulty Metrics

Operators will record the energy and time necessary to traverse binding sites and will be able to correlate these two metrics to IVUS ILA grade Extraction difficulty was measured by correlating IVUS ILA grade to lead dwell time - the amount of time it took to extract the lead. Using the following scale, grading of ILA in each zone of interest, based on relative motion of lead was performed: i. Grade 1: Freely mobile, Rarely adjacent to vasculature ii. Grade 2: Restricted mobility, Frequently adjacent to vasculature iii. Grade 3: Immobile, Always adjacent to vasculature iv. Grade L, added to number: Lead-to-lead binding

Time frame: Through study completion, expected to be 6 months

Population: Means calculated for patients with left sided devices vs patients with right sided devices - 4 patients had missing data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IVUS ImagingExtraction Difficulty MetricsRight sided devices26.5 minutesStandard Deviation 21.92
IVUS ImagingExtraction Difficulty MetricsLeft sided devices34.91 minutesStandard Deviation 36.94

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026