Skip to content

Effects of Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Robot and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Among Patients With Stroke

Effects of Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Robot and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Upper Extremity Function Among Subjects With Tremor After Cerebellar and Brainstem Stroke

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04055597
Enrollment
40
Registered
2019-08-14
Start date
2017-06-01
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2019-08-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

cerebellar stroke, upper extremity rehabilitation robot, transcranial direct current stimulation, stroke rehabilitation

Brief summary

Effects of upper extremity rehabilitation robot and transcranial direct current stimulation on upper extremity function among subjects with tremor after stroke

Interventions

Combined transcranial direct current stimulation(tDCS) on-line and upper extremity rehabilitation robot for 5 times a week for 4 weeks

Combined sham tDCS and upper extremity rehabilitation robot for 5 times a week for 4 weeks

Sponsors

National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Stroke with cerebellar hemorrhage or infarction * ataxia or tremor on upper extremities secondary to stroke * Cognitively intact enough to understand and follow the instructions from the investigator

Exclusion criteria

* History of surgery of affected upper limb * Fracture of affected upper limb

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxiaChange of Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia at 4 weeks after baseline compared to baselineChange of Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia
Change of Functional ataxia rating scale - upper limbChange of the Functional ataxia rating scale - upper limb, at 4 weeks after baseline compared to baselineChange of Functional ataxia rating scale - upper limb

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Jerk during reaching and finger pointingbaseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baselineKinematic data during reaching and finger pointing using Trakstar
Smoothness during reaching and finger pointingbaseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baselineKinematic data during reaching and finger pointing using Trakstar
Behavioral activation system/behavioral inhibition system scalebaseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baselineIn terms of motivation
Beck's depression indexbaseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baselineBeck's depression index
Stroke rehabilitation motivation scalebaseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baselineStroke rehabilitation motivation scale
Intrinsic motivation inventorybaseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baselineIntrinsic motivation inventory
Numeric rating scale for upper extremity painbaseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baselineQuestion about the upper extremity pain (0-10; higher is better)
Fugl-Meyer Assessment - upper extremitybaseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baselineFugl-Meyer Assessment - upper extremity
modified Barthel indexbaseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baselinemodified Barthel index
% maximal voluntary contraction from upper extremity muscles during reaching taskbaseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baselinedata from surface electromyography from upper extremity muscles during reaching task
Kinematic data during scale for the assessment and rating of ataxiabaseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baselineKinematic data during scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia
Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxiabaseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baselineScale for the assessment and rating of ataxia
Functional ataxia rating scale - upper limbbaseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baselineFunctional ataxia rating scale - upper limb, kinematic data during scale for the assessment
Kinematic data during scale during the Functional ataxia rating scale - upper limbbaseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baselineKinematic data during scale during the Functional ataxia rating scale - upper limb
Functional reaching testbaseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baselineFunctional reaching test
Composite cerebellar functional severity scorebaseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baselineComposite cerebellar functional severity score (Nine hole peg test + click test)

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

Primary ContactJoon-Ho Shin, MS
asfreelyas@gmail.com82-2-901-1884

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026