Skip to content

Bio-mechanical Reasoning and Lateral Specificity of Upper Cervical Joint Mobilization

Bio-mechanical Reasoning and Lateral Specificity of Upper Cervical Joint Mobilization to Improve Cervical Rotation, Improve Function and Reduce Pain.... Does it Matter?

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04054869
Enrollment
15
Registered
2019-08-13
Start date
2019-11-07
Completion date
2020-10-31
Last updated
2019-11-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neck Pain

Keywords

neck stiffness, manual therapy, joint mobilization

Brief summary

Participants with limited neck rotation are recruited to determine if manual therapy (joint stretching) techniques applied in a bio-mechanically correct sequence will improve neck motion, function and pain better than if the manual therapy is applied in the opposite direction. Each participant will receive both the correct and the incorrect applications in randomized order with each treatment separated by 2-3 days. Improvement in neck motion, function and pain will be assessed after each session.

Detailed description

Participants are recruited consecutively through referral from provider clinics or through self referral to physical therapy in the outpatient rehabilitation clinic at Indiana University Health West Hospital in Avon Indiana. After obtaining informed consent and meeting study criteria, participants will be randomized into either first receiving atlanto-axial joint mobilizations in a bio-mechanically correct or incorrect direction with respect to their loss of cervical rotation. Outcome measures will be completed both pre and post treatment. The participants will then be given self stretches at home to mimic the same intervention performed in the clinic three times per day. The participants will then return to the clinic in two or three days to receive the opposite treatment and opposite home program. Outcome data will again be collected both pre and post treatment. Participants will return for a final visit in two or three days and final outcome data will be collected and the participant will be offered continuation of physical therapy if neck symptoms still persist. Planned Statistical Analysis: * Descriptive statistics of subjects: age, gender, date of onset, Neck Disability Index, cervical active range of motion rotation, initial numeric pain rating at rest and rotating to the limited side * Repeated measures ANOVA effect sizes for comparing differences between: 1. Pre and post treatment comparing with-in treatment change for cervical range of motion rotation and numeric pain ratings on 1st and 2nd visits. Also comparing post treatment in cervical range of motion rotation and numeric pain ratings between 2nd and 3rd visits. 2. Neck disability index change between 1st and 2nd visits and 2nd and 3rd visits * Power calculation (actual achieved power)

Interventions

OTHERBio-mechanically correct manual therapy at the cervical atlanto-axial joints

Participant is seated in a firm backed chair. The treating physical therapist mobilizes both the ipsi-lateral and contra-lateral atlanto-axial spinal segments congruently to the direction of rotational loss.

OTHERBio-mechanically in-correct manual therapy at the cervical atlanto-axial joints

Participant is seated in a firm backed chair. The treating physical therapist mobilizes both the ipsi-lateral and contra-lateral atlanto-axial spinal segments in-congruently to the direction of rotational loss.

Sponsors

Andrews University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

participants and the outcomes assessor will be masked (blinded) as to the order in which each participant receives the interventions

Intervention model description

each participant receives both treatments in randomized order

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* males or females between 18 and 80 years of age * 25 percent or greater asymmetry of active cervical range of motion rotation limited by pain and/or stiffness

Exclusion criteria

* cervical surgeries or injections in the past one year * current manual or exercise treatment by another provider for neck pain * cervical manipulation/mobilization/trauma in past 3 months * cervical radicular or referred pain distal to the acromion * upper extremity neurologic myotome weakness or constant dermatomal numbness * pending litigation * signs of cervical myelopathy or vertebrobasilar artery insufficiency * use of prescribed anticoagulants or documented blood clotting disorder * alar or transverse ligament instability

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
intra-visit change in cervical active range of motion rotationday 1: pre and post treatment change, day 3: pre and post treatment changemeasured by standard goniometry

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
intra-visit change in cervical pain at restday 1: pre and post treatment change, day 3: pre and post treatment changemeasured by the numeric pain rating scale 0-10
inter-visit change in neck disability/functionchange between day 1 and day 3, change between day 3 and day 5measured by Neck Disability Index (NDI) score, range 0-100% with 0%= no disability and 100% = fully disabled
intra-visit change in cervical pain during most restricted active rotationday 1: pre and post treatment change, day 3: pre and post treatment changemeasured by the numeric pain rating scale 0-10

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactMichael Williams, MPT
mwilliams6@iuhealth.org(317)757-9160
Backup ContactGreg Almeter, DScPT
almeter@andrews.edu(269)471-6552

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026