Stroke
Conditions
Keywords
upper limb rehabilitation, stroke, proximal upper rehabilitation robot, distal upper rehabilitation robot
Brief summary
Comparison of the effect of upper limb rehabilitation on the application of proximal upper rehabilitation robot and distal upper rehabilitation robot with stroke patients
Interventions
DEVICEdistal upper rehabilitation robot
Intervention with distal upper rehabilitation robot
DEVICEproximal upper rehabilitation robot
Intervention with proximal upper rehabilitation robot
Sponsors
National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Hemiplegic patients secondary to first cerebrovascular accidents * Onset ≥ 3 months * 29 ≤ Fugl-Meyer Assessment score * Cognitively intact enough to understand and follow the instructions from the investigator
Exclusion criteria
* History of surgery of affected upper limb * Fracture of affected upper limb
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Wolf motor function test | change from baseline at 4 weeks | an activity indicator, has 15 items for testing functional ability |
| Fugl-Meyer Assessment | change from baseline at 4 weeks | indicator of the level of impairment of upper extremity, with higher scores indicating lower impairment |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Action reach arm test | baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline | to assess upper extremity performance (coordination, dexterity and functioning) in stroke recovery |
| Motor status score | baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline | evaluate the impairment level |
| Box and block test | baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline | measures unilateral gross manual dexterity |
| Wolf motor function test | baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline | an activity indicator, has 15 items for testing functional ability |
| Fugl-Meyer Assessment | baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline | indicator of the level of impairment of upper extremity, with higher scores indicating lower impairment |
| Curvature of upper extremity during reaching task | baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline | Curvature of the magnetic sensor trajectory (Kinematics of upper extremity during) reaching task |
| Jerk of upper extremity during reaching task | baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline | Jerk of the magnetic sensor trajectory (Kinematics of upper extremity during) reaching task |
| Motor evoked potential over motor cortex of the affected side | baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline | Motor evoked potential elicited by noninvasive stimulation (rTMS) of the motor cortex |
| Stroke impact scale 3.0 | baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline | Total score and individual domain score of stroke impact scale |
| Mean velocity of upper extremity during reaching task | baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline | Mean velocity of the magnetic sensor trajectory (Kinematics of upper extremity during) reaching task |
| Motor activity log | baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline | Assesses the use of the paretic arm and hand during activities of daily living in hemiparetic stroke patients. |
Countries
South Korea
Contacts
Primary ContactJoon-Ho Shin, MS
Outcome results
None listed