Skip to content

Prevention of Dysrhythmias on the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit - Does Maintenance of High-normal Serum Potassium Levels Matter

The TIGHT-K STUDY. Prevention of Dysrhythmias on the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit - Does Maintenance of High-normal Serum Potassium Levels Matter

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04053816
Acronym
TIGHT-K
Enrollment
1684
Registered
2019-08-13
Start date
2020-10-20
Completion date
2024-06-26
Last updated
2024-11-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arrhythmias, Cardiac

Keywords

cardiovascular, potassium supplementation, cardiac surgery, atrial fibrillation, coronary artery bypass grafting, potassium

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a strategy of maintaining serum potassium levels at ≥3.6 mEq/L is non-inferior to a strategy of usual treatment (≥4.5 mEq/L) on the occurrence of new onset atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery (AFACS) in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

Detailed description

At least one in three patients is affected by atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery(AFACS), with most episodes occurring in the first five postoperative days. AF occurrence is associated with increased morbidity, short and long-term mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay and cost of care. Persistence of these associations after adjustment for potential confounding factors suggests that they may be causal. The incidence and prevalence of AF and its associated costs are expected to increase as the surgical population ages. Extensive effort is undertaken to prevent AF after cardiac surgery from occurring, but clinical practice in this area is highly variable and the evidence base for most interventions is sparse. Potassium plays an important role in cardiac electrophysiology. Serum potassium concentrations (\[K+\]) are commonly low following cardiac surgery, and appear marginally lower in those suffering atrial arrhythmias in non-surgical cohorts. Despite an absence of proof that this association is causal, efforts to maintain serum \[K+\] in the 'high-normal' range (≥ 4.5 mEq/L), as opposed to just intervening if potassium drops below its lower 'normal' threshold (\<3.6 mEq/L), are considered 'routine practice' for AF prevention in post-surgical patients in many centres across the world. From the (unpublished) data from our Tight-K Feasibility Study, all 160 patients would have required at least one dose of potassium to supplement their levels to this high-normal range and 45.5% of all serum \[K+\] measurements were below 4.5mEq/L at some point. Data from the same pilot study show a median number of potassium doses given in the 'tight' group (high-normal serum potassium target) of seven, compared to a median of one, with most patients not receiving any potassium supplementation at all, in the 'relaxed' group. This demonstrated for the first time ever, that the practice does achieve a separation in serum potassium levels between the two groups, so the protocol is indeed effective in achieving higher serum potassium levels. The efficacy of the practice of maintaining high-normal serum potassium levels for the prevention of AF after cardiac surgery, however, remains unproven and data supporting it are extremely limited, being derived from observational studies rather than randomised trials. Indeed, no data exist to demonstrate that maintaining a high-normal potassium level is beneficial in these circumstances, or that aggressive replenishment of potassium in these patients improves outcome. Meanwhile, potassium supplementation may cause discomfort or harm. Routine central venous potassium administration in the early post-operative period, when oral supplementation is not possible, is time-consuming, costly and associated with clinical risk: rapid infusion can prove fatal, and leaving central venous catheters in situ for the sole purpose of potassium replacement increases infection risk. Oral replacement (when feasible) is commonly associated with profound nausea and gastrointestinal side effects, and is very poorly tolerated by patients. The annual costs of intravenous potassium exceed those for other drugs in many cardiac surgical units due to the large quantities administered. Nursing time (e.g. for drug checks and administration) will add to this cost. The routine maintenance of serum \[K+\] ≥ 4.5 mEq/L is a costly practice of unproven efficacy that is unpleasant and may be hazardous for patients. The investigators shall address this issue, performing the first appropriately powered non-inferiority multicentre randomised trial of potassium supplementation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.

Interventions

The trial treatment will start when patients are admitted to the intensive care unit after their surgery. The patient will undergo regular blood investigations, as per current practice. The frequency of K+ monitoring while on ICU will be according to clinician / nursing staff preference. Potassium supplementation will be according to local hospital protocols. This can be either via an intravenous infusion or as a tablet. Patients will otherwise be treated as per current hospital protocol.

Sponsors

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary
CollaboratorOTHER
Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
Blackpool Victoria Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Derriford Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Freeman Health System
CollaboratorOTHER
Golden Jubilee National Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
King's College Hospital NHS Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
CollaboratorOTHER
Royal Sussex County Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
Universität Münster
CollaboratorOTHER
Wythenshawe Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Barts & The London NHS Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Scheduled to have isolated CABG surgery * Patient in sinus rhythm

Exclusion criteria

* Age less than 18 years * Previous history of Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter and/or Atrial Tachyarrhythmia * Pre-operative high-degree atrioventricular (AV) block (defined as Mobitz type 2 second degree AV block or complete heart block) * Pre-operative serum \[K+\] greater than 5.5 mEq/L * Current/previous use of medication for the purposes of cardiac rhythm management * Dialysis-dependent end-stage renal failure * Concurrent patient involvement in another clinical trial assessing cardiac rhythm post-operative interventions * Unable to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The presence of new onset AFACS until until hour 120 after initial admission to ICU/post-operative care facility, or discharge from hospital, whichever occurs first.Maximum of 5 daysEpisode of AFACS lasting ≥30 seconds that is both clinically detected and electrocardiographically confirmed (on either a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), telemetry or Holter monitoring

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The incidence of at least one episode of AFACSMaximum of 5 daysClinically identified AFACS or Holter-identified AFACS until hour 120 after initial admission to ICU/post-operative care facility or discharge from hospital, whichever occurs first.
Number of patients experiencing at least one episode of a non-AF arrhythmia.Maximum of 5 daysIdentified on Holter monitor until hour 120 after after initial admission to ICU/post-operative care facility or discharge from hospital, whichever occurs first
In-patient mortalityMaximum 6 months
6-month mortalityMaximum 6 months
The incidence of new onset AFACSMaximum of 5 daysDetected on Holter monitor until hour 120 after initial admission to ICU/post-operative care facility or discharge from hospital, whichever occurs first.
Hospital length of stayMaximum 6 monthsNumber of days patients are inpatients in all hospital wards
Costs relating to potassium therapyMaximum of 5 daysFinancial cost of administering potassium therapy to patients
Quality of life at 6 months: questionnaire6 monthsQuality of life questionnaire(EQ-5D-5L) administered before surgery and at 6 month follow up
Critical care length of stayMaximum 6 monthsNumber of days patients are in inpatients in critical care

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026