Skip to content

Agitation Follow up After Introduction of a New Patient Care Algorithm

Agitation Follow up After Introduction of a New Patient Care Algorithm

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04053426
Acronym
SARA
Enrollment
138
Registered
2019-08-12
Start date
2018-07-19
Completion date
2021-03-31
Last updated
2024-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Agitation,Psychomotor

Keywords

RASS, CAM-ICU

Brief summary

Agitation in the intensive care unit is motor hyperactivity. It is frequent (b/w 30% to 70%) and has multiple causes: pain, medical reason, delirium, medication, etc. It can be a source of complication, for the patient, and equipment pullout. International recommendations state that the agitation should be taken care of with standardized protocols to improve patient care.

Detailed description

Data regarding patient characteristics and evaluation criterion will be collected automatically with the unit software (CCC, General Electrics) in specific file. Care and health teams enter the data systematically following the usual protocol. First Step : Follow-up and collection of data of patients included. Agitation evaluation with RASS scale, pain evaluation with BPS or NPRS. Second Step: Team training to delirium evaluation scale (CAM-ICU) and to the use of care algorithm. Third Step: Follow-up and collection of data of patients included. Use of care algorithm by doctors, nurses and back up training nurse to ensure daily information to health professionals of the care unit. Concomitant Step: Post discharge from care unit medical appointment to evaluate anxiety symptoms (HAD scale) and quality of life (SF-12)

Interventions

OTHERImplementation of agitation care algorithm

Following the agitation care algorithm care professional adapt their behavior regarding agitation

Sponsors

Fondation Apicil
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital, Grenoble
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient presenting an agitation episode (RASS\>1) * Intensive care unit hospitalization * Patient or next of kin if patient not able non opposed on participating to the study

Exclusion criteria

* Decision to limit life-sustaining therapy * Brain damage * Moribund patient * Patient participating to another trial excluding observational studies * The patient is pregnant or a lactating female * Patient under tutorship or curatorship and liberty deprived

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
RASS scale evaluation between phase before and phase afterat the end of each phase, average of 1 yearComparison of the duration of agitation between phase before and phase after

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026